From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
To: "[ext] Silvano Cirujano Cuesta"
<silvano.cirujano-cuesta@siemens.com>,
isar-users@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] images: add support for container images
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 11:31:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0332682f-48f6-01f7-132e-ef719299a06a@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <246640e2-1c02-77e9-888e-3194630cea1c@siemens.com>
On 15.02.21 10:46, [ext] Silvano Cirujano Cuesta wrote:
> Wouldn't it make sense to put the "containerize_rootfs" function in a separate class and let "image.bbclass" inherit from it?
>
Sounds reasonable to me, even if we end up with only one function in
that class, at least so far.
Jan
> The current structure that I have come up to seems weird to me, it isn't obvious that "containerize_rootfs" is meant to be reused.
>
> (-) an additional class for a single function
>
> (+) better structured code
>
> Possibilities that seem to fit somehow:
> - specific class "container.bbclass",
> - specific class "image-container-extension.bbclass"
> - existing class already being inherited by "image.bbclass" ("rootfs.bbclass" -is it a rootfs feature?-, "image-postproc-extension.bbclass", "image-tools-extension.bbclass")
> and I cannot tell which one fits best.
>
> Silvano
>
> On 12/02/2021 19:23, [ext] Silvano Cirujano Cuesta wrote:
>> On 12/02/2021 19:06, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> On 12.02.21 18:46, Silvano Cirujano Cuesta wrote:
>>>> On 12/02/2021 18:10, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>>> On 12.02.21 09:51, [ext] Silvano Cirujano Cuesta wrote:
>>>>>> Add support for creation of container images with the build root
>>>>>> filesystems.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Extend also task "populate_sdk" to support the creation of a container image
>>>>>> containing the SDK.
>>>>> Should be done in to steps: container-img.bbclass frirst, and then a
>>>>> patch to use it for the SDK as well.
>>>> Ok. There are some many different tastes WRT to big vs small commits :-)
>>> Rather /wrt logically separatable steps.
>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Silvano Cirujano Cuesta <silvano.cirujano-cuesta@siemens.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> meta/classes/container-img.bbclass | 88 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>> meta/classes/image-sdk-extension.bbclass | 51 ++++++++++++--
>>>>>> meta/classes/image.bbclass | 1 +
>>>>>> 3 files changed, 133 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>>>> create mode 100644 meta/classes/container-img.bbclass
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/meta/classes/container-img.bbclass b/meta/classes/container-img.bbclass
>>>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>>>> index 0000000..35c7bbc
>>>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>>>> +++ b/meta/classes/container-img.bbclass
>>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
>>>>>> +# This software is a part of ISAR.
>>>>>> +# Copyright (C) Siemens AG, 2021
>>>>>> +#
>>>>>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
>>>>>> +#
>>>>>> +# This class provides the tasks 'containerize_rootfs' and 'containerize_sdk'
>>>>> Nope, it now only provides the former.
>>>> Yes, you're right, will fix it.
>>>>>> +# to create container images containing the target rootfs and the SDK
>>>>>> +# respectively.
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +CONTAINER_FORMATS ?= "docker-archive"
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +containerize_rootfs() {
>>>>>> + local cmd="/bin/dash"
>>>>>> + local empty_tag="empty"
>>>>>> + local full_tag="latest"
>>>>>> + local oci_img_dir="${WORKDIR}/oci-image"
>>>>>> + local rootfs="$1"
>>>>>> + local rootfs_id="$2"
>>>>>> + local container_formats="$3"
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + # prepare OCI container image skeleton
>>>>>> + bbdebug 1 "prepare OCI container image skeleton"
>>>>>> + rm -rf "${oci_img_dir}"
>>>>>> + sudo umoci init --layout "${oci_img_dir}"
>>>>>> + sudo umoci new --image "${oci_img_dir}:${empty_tag}"
>>>>>> + sudo umoci config --image "${oci_img_dir}:${empty_tag}" \
>>>>>> + --config.cmd="${cmd}"
>>>>>> + sudo umoci unpack --image "${oci_img_dir}:${empty_tag}" \
>>>>>> + "${oci_img_dir}_unpacked"
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + # add root filesystem as the flesh of the skeleton
>>>>>> + sudo cp -a "${rootfs}"/* "${oci_img_dir}_unpacked/rootfs/"
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + # pack container image
>>>>>> + bbdebug 1 "pack container image"
>>>>>> + sudo umoci repack --image "${oci_img_dir}:${full_tag}" \
>>>>>> + "${oci_img_dir}_unpacked"
>>>>>> + sudo umoci remove --image "${oci_img_dir}:${empty_tag}"
>>>>>> + sudo rm -rf "${oci_img_dir}_unpacked"
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + # no root needed anymore
>>>>>> + sudo chown --recursive $(id -u):$(id -g) "${oci_img_dir}"
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + # convert the OCI container image to the desired format
>>>>>> + image_name="isar-${rootfs_id}"
>>>>>> + for image_type in ${CONTAINER_FORMATS} ; do
>>>>>> + image_archive="${DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE}/${rootfs_id}-${image_type}.tar"
>>>>>> + bbdebug 1 "Creating container image type: ${image_type}"
>>>>>> + case "${image_type}" in
>>>>>> + "docker-archive" | "oci-archive")
>>>>>> + if [ "${image_type}" = "oci-archive" ] ; then
>>>>>> + target="${image_type}:${image_archive}:latest"
>>>>>> + else
>>>>>> + target="${image_type}:${image_archive}:${image_name}:latest"
>>>>>> + fi
>>>>>> + rm -f "${image_archive}" "${image_archive}.xz"
>>>>>> + bbdebug 2 "Converting OCI image to ${image_type}"
>>>>>> + skopeo --insecure-policy copy \
>>>>>> + "oci:${oci_img_dir}:${full_tag}" "${target}"
>>>>>> + bbdebug 2 "Compressing image"
>>>>>> + xz -T0 "${image_archive}"
>>>>>> + ;;
>>>>>> + "oci")
>>>>>> + tar --create --xz --directory "${oci_img_dir}" \
>>>>>> + --file "${image_archive}.xz" .
>>>>>> + ;;
>>>>>> + "docker-daemon" | "containers-storage")
>>>>>> + skopeo --insecure-policy copy \
>>>>>> + "oci:${oci_img_dir}:${full_tag}" \
>>>>>> + "${image_type}:${image_name}:latest"
>>>>>> + ;;
>>>>> Missing check for "Am I in a container?", like in the SDK. Maybe move
>>>>> that test here and share.
>>>> Not needed, since the usage of IMAGE_TYPE is fixing already to container type.
>>>>
>>>> In the case of the SDK the same task is provides the non-containerized format tar-xz.
>>>>
>>> I cannot follow: What is the difference between
>>> CONTAINER_FORMATS="docker-daemon" and SDK_FORMATS="docker-daemon" when
>>> running inside a kas build container? Both do not work, do they?
>> I misunderstood what you meant.
>>
>> But I got it now, and that's what I meant with the messed up case section.
>>
>> In the next version the "Am I a container?" is in the function, no need to do it twice.
>>
>>>>>> + *)
>>>>>> + die "Unsupported format for containerize_rootfs: ${image_type}"
>>>>>> + ;;
>>>>>> + esac
>>>>>> + done
>>>>>> +}
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +do_container_image[stamp-extra-info] = "${DISTRO}-${MACHINE}"
>>>>>> +do_container_image[vardeps] += "CONTAINER_FORMATS"
>>>>>> +do_container_image(){
>>>>>> + rootfs_id="${DISTRO}-${DISTRO_ARCH}"
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + bbnote "Generate container image in these formats: ${CONTAINER_FORMATS}"
>>>>> Probabably more "bbdebug"? Unsure. But we aren't using bbnote in the
>>>>> core so far. Nor bbdebug, though.
>>>> At least bbdebug is IMO needed for debbuging if goes wrong.
>>>>
>>>> BTW I'm using bbdebug a lot in the containerize_rootfs section because I've missed those kind of traces much too often when trying to debug some issues on ISAR recipes.
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps we should have more debug verbosity in the logs to ease debugging...
>>>>
>>>>>> + containerize_rootfs "${IMAGE_ROOTFS}" "${rootfs_id}" "${CONTAINER_FORMATS}"
>>>>>> +}
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +addtask container_image before do_image after do_image_tools
>>>>>> diff --git a/meta/classes/image-sdk-extension.bbclass b/meta/classes/image-sdk-extension.bbclass
>>>>>> index a8c708a..63138da 100644
>>>>>> --- a/meta/classes/image-sdk-extension.bbclass
>>>>>> +++ b/meta/classes/image-sdk-extension.bbclass
>>>>>> @@ -6,11 +6,25 @@
>>>>>> # This class extends the image.bbclass to supply the creation of a sdk
>>>>>>
>>>>>> SDK_INCLUDE_ISAR_APT ?= "0"
>>>>>> +SDK_FORMATS ?= "tar-xz"
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +sdk_tar_xz() {
>>>>>> + # Copy mount_chroot.sh for convenience
>>>>>> + sudo cp ${SCRIPTSDIR}/mount_chroot.sh ${SDKCHROOT_DIR}
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + # Create SDK archive
>>>>>> + cd -P ${SDKCHROOT_DIR}/..
>>>>>> + sudo tar --transform="s|^rootfs|sdk-${DISTRO}-${DISTRO_ARCH}|" \
>>>>>> + -c rootfs | xz -T0 > ${DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE}/sdk-${DISTRO}-${DISTRO_ARCH}.tar.xz
>>>>>> + bbnote "SDK rootfs available in ${DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE}/sdk-${DISTRO}-${DISTRO_ARCH}.tar.xz"
>>>>>> +}
>>>>>>
>>>>>> do_populate_sdk[stamp-extra-info] = "${DISTRO}-${MACHINE}"
>>>>>> do_populate_sdk[depends] = "sdkchroot:do_build"
>>>>>> -do_populate_sdk[vardeps] += "SDK_INCLUDE_ISAR_APT"
>>>>>> +do_populate_sdk[vardeps] += "SDK_INCLUDE_ISAR_APT SDK_FORMATS"
>>>>>> do_populate_sdk() {
>>>>>> + local sdk_container_formats=""
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> if [ "${SDK_INCLUDE_ISAR_APT}" = "1" ]; then
>>>>>> # Copy isar-apt with deployed Isar packages
>>>>>> sudo cp -Trpfx ${REPO_ISAR_DIR}/${DISTRO} ${SDKCHROOT_DIR}/isar-apt
>>>>>> @@ -48,12 +62,35 @@ do_populate_sdk() {
>>>>>> done
>>>>>> done
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - # Copy mount_chroot.sh for convenience
>>>>>> - sudo cp ${SCRIPTSDIR}/mount_chroot.sh ${SDKCHROOT_DIR}
>>>>>> + # separate SDK formats: TAR and container formats
>>>>>> + for sdk_format in ${SDK_FORMATS} ; do
>>>>>> + case ${sdk_format} in
>>>>>> + "tar-xz")
>>>>>> + sdk_tar_xz
>>>>>> + ;;
>>>>>> + "docker-archive" | "oci" | "oci-archive")
>>>>>> + if [ -z "${sdk_container_formats}" ] ; then
>>>>> Unneeded, just use the else part unconditionally.
>>>> The else part alone adds a heading whitespace. It's being ignored in containerize_rootfs, but it's still messing up some outputs.
>>>>
>>>> Not really useless, but not important (in fact that was my 1st version). I can change it in the next patch series version that I need anyway.
>>>>
>>> Looks like cosmetics, not functional issues.
>>>
>>> But if you dislike the leading whitespaces in the debug logs, make it
>>> trailing (prepend rather than append).
>>>
>>>>>> + sdk_container_formats="${sdk_format}"
>>>>>> + else
>>>>>> + sdk_container_formats="${sdk_container_formats} ${sdk_format}"
>>>>>> + fi
>>>>>> + ;;
>>>>>> + "docker-daemon" | "containers-storage")
>>>>>> + if [ -f /.dockerenv ] || [ -f /run/.containerenv ] ; then
>>>>>> + die "Adding the SDK container image to a container runtime (${sdk_format}) not supported if running from a container (e.g. 'kas-container')"
>>>>>> + fi
>>>>> See above, should likely go into containerize_rootfs().
>>>> Right, will fix it.
>>>>
>>>> In fact this case section is really messed up, I have to clean it up completely.
>>>>
>>> OK, seems we are again on the same page.
>>>
>>>>>> + ;;
>>>>>> + *)
>>>>>> + die "unsupported SDK format specified: ${sdk_format}"
>>>>>> + ;;
>>>>>> + esac
>>>>>> + done
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - # Create SDK archive
>>>>>> - cd -P ${SDKCHROOT_DIR}/..
>>>>>> - sudo tar --transform="s|^rootfs|sdk-${DISTRO}-${DISTRO_ARCH}|" \
>>>>>> - -c rootfs | xz -T0 > ${DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE}/sdk-${DISTRO}-${DISTRO_ARCH}.tar.xz
>>>>>> + # generate the SDK in all the desired container formats
>>>>>> + if [ -n "${sdk_container_formats}" ] ; then
>>>>>> + bbnote "Generating SDK container in ${sdk_container_formats} format"
>>>>>> + containerize_rootfs "${SDKCHROOT_DIR}" "sdk-${DISTRO}-${DISTRO_ARCH}" "${sdk_container_formats}"
>>>>>> + fi
>>>>>> }
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> addtask populate_sdk after do_rootfs
>>>>>> diff --git a/meta/classes/image.bbclass b/meta/classes/image.bbclass
>>>>>> index eddc444..7fb7b7e 100644
>>>>>> --- a/meta/classes/image.bbclass
>>>>>> +++ b/meta/classes/image.bbclass
>>>>>> @@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ inherit image-tools-extension
>>>>>> inherit image-postproc-extension
>>>>>> inherit image-locales-extension
>>>>>> inherit image-account-extension
>>>>>> +inherit container-img
>>>>>>
>>>>>> # Extra space for rootfs in MB
>>>>>> ROOTFS_EXTRA ?= "64"
>>>>>>
>>>>> Jan
>>>> Silvano
>>>>
>>> Jan
>> Silvano
>>
>
--
Siemens AG, T RDA IOT
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-15 10:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-12 8:51 [PATCH v3 0/2] Add support for containerized root filesystems Silvano Cirujano Cuesta
2021-02-12 8:51 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] images: add support for container images Silvano Cirujano Cuesta
2021-02-12 17:10 ` Jan Kiszka
2021-02-12 17:46 ` Silvano Cirujano Cuesta
2021-02-12 18:04 ` Silvano Cirujano Cuesta
2021-02-12 18:06 ` Jan Kiszka
2021-02-12 18:23 ` Silvano Cirujano Cuesta
2021-02-15 9:46 ` Silvano Cirujano Cuesta
2021-02-15 10:31 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2021-02-12 8:51 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] docs: document creation of " Silvano Cirujano Cuesta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0332682f-48f6-01f7-132e-ef719299a06a@siemens.com \
--to=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=isar-users@googlegroups.com \
--cc=silvano.cirujano-cuesta@siemens.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox