From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-GM-THRID: 7062708050763710464 X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9bd4:0:b0:246:f5d:13af with SMTP id w20-20020a2e9bd4000000b002460f5d13afmr6169731ljj.234.1645202306466; Fri, 18 Feb 2022 08:38:26 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: isar-users@googlegroups.com Received: by 2002:a05:6512:15a3:b0:443:7b15:f451 with SMTP id bp35-20020a05651215a300b004437b15f451ls385566lfb.0.gmail; Fri, 18 Feb 2022 08:38:25 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyh3/FY7su+BXhQOKdbpHArFcGfBWKJgwkYfv7I0cnjNOZYWUNTin07d3k9iQnqqD6iUAYM X-Received: by 2002:a19:f00f:0:b0:443:ae5c:47d0 with SMTP id p15-20020a19f00f000000b00443ae5c47d0mr4541894lfc.332.1645202305487; Fri, 18 Feb 2022 08:38:25 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1645202305; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=IbzKVOvxK+6RlYCL3ze7mBtX15Jg43hmXR/PHjAxhEpGjftoTmZRp+YYpOtiWTucG5 118iJgbFXxTRvNuw9xJdw6T5Vvkukcmj16LHl7x8r39E2ldM5210M7va1tDFk8IJ3Gah EVHap0v1bbc1sgiTQ9RsX+AEnKxSC7Ud621QGkZzlQbb2iQiC2m7pP40d1Xn2tQh1UU0 H5zbILmzxyjrJDPQaCPXdmN/WfgRJngwp2p6UF52OB6aoWoP+hZ89qcSKsJF0WlzeRlC OPrqT43yWQUAFqqxmsdvu84HPzMLghjJnEKE3SY0TV4FiwLj0yjQo7f2OqjVVsa7oqr8 e4uA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id; bh=U48N4SP2S7SLP6JjdjT2Vlf6SwH+d0JmOfLryv6LzGE=; b=ohqckFZhxPQ4B3E5e8n+ZPPI0FLyebXNV1CHdqnstMxYFGvEFMK/ETY00is4PtOXYy q9H6NA1YH50sXrm9+sOyodFwLH0i6Fv8Sk97G3A0x3CG9C5SfHbIjIkzGHA3JJ4XoklJ LQH8dJvORFWJ2ePC2usaTqaA86eRy9ubENz2//tNb9c0rgj2W0d3UgoHOOyaIrpjtTM0 cDnLdZGOHk1jVxJseKpUQLvmvY6Qv/Ceppg5afid7MHRznCypM+dhClkdJbUWZVqtDJ0 iIvuueTXi2870kDcSUHVENLFZZf5YrtlGYVciG3Pd4WGuIZtQU2ljwUh0UOj3RwseIyd IozA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of amikan@ilbers.de designates 85.214.156.166 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=amikan@ilbers.de Return-Path: Received: from shymkent.ilbers.de (shymkent.ilbers.de. [85.214.156.166]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c24si179416lfc.0.2022.02.18.08.38.25 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Fri, 18 Feb 2022 08:38:25 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of amikan@ilbers.de designates 85.214.156.166 as permitted sender) client-ip=85.214.156.166; Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of amikan@ilbers.de designates 85.214.156.166 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=amikan@ilbers.de Received: from [127.0.0.1] (host-80-81-17-52.static.customer.m-online.net [80.81.17.52]) (authenticated bits=0) by shymkent.ilbers.de (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-8) with ESMTPSA id 21IGcM8s003635 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 18 Feb 2022 17:38:24 +0100 Message-ID: <0d5ceae2-3e06-da63-a782-02015062bceb@ilbers.de> Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2022 19:38:22 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.5.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Rebuild phyBOARD-Mira UBI image generation Content-Language: en-US To: "Schmidt, Adriaan" , "isar-users@googlegroups.com" References: <20220209135411.1313521-1-amikan@ilbers.de> From: Anton Mikanovich In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on shymkent.ilbers.de X-TUID: vKWKJLXdHxuK 10.02.2022 09:52, Schmidt, Adriaan wrote: > Anton Mikanovich, 9. Februar 2022 14:54: >> Rebuild UBI image generation implementation to support any count of >> targets with different settings. This also will allow to build the same >> isar-image-base image for both UBI and non-UBI targets. >> Add correct UBI and UBIFS layouts for phyBOARD-Mira after that. > I've just posted a proposal to generally rework image generation > ([PATCH 0/6] imagetypes), which overlaps with your patches 1..3. > I admit that I don't fully understand the ubi(-ubifs) process, so my series > might actually break something here. But I can imagine that your image > changes could also get simpler if you put them on top of my imagetypes > patches. > > Adriaan The main "blocking" issue I've found is override implementation. We need to have a way to use image type related overrides outside recipes included by INHERIT variable. Moreover, current implementation of overrides for multiple image types looks incorrect, because only one type is actually used for override at one inherit.