From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
To: "[ext] Henning Schild" <henning.schild@siemens.com>,
isar-users@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dpkg-base: apt-get "update" before "source"
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 13:53:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0ff54328-5b30-e645-619e-0eaac9c184b5@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190211103526.3d92babf@md1za8fc.ad001.siemens.net>
On 11.02.19 10:35, [ext] Henning Schild wrote:
> Here i see an often repeating pattern. That "apt-get update" is now
> present in many entry points to the buildchroot.
> I guess we should factor it out and put it into a central place. And
> the rule of thumb probably is ... whenever you use anything apt,
> apt-get update before you do ...
If you are only talking about updating our locally maintained repo (like below),
that is fine to factor out and reuse. However, we must not update against public
repos after the initial pulling, in order to ensure we have a consistent package
set along the whole build.
Jan
>
> Henning
>
> Am Mon, 11 Feb 2019 10:33:24 +0100
> schrieb Henning Schild <henning.schild@siemens.com>:
>
>> From: Henning Schild <henning.schild@siemens.com>
>>
>> When rebuilding we can run into an inconsistent view where buildchroot
>> assumes it could download the sources of a modified upstream package.
>> After a "reprepro ... remove" we always need to "apt-get update" to
>> not operate on an old version of the metadata.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Henning Schild <henning.schild@siemens.com>
>> ---
>> meta/classes/dpkg-base.bbclass | 4 ++++
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/meta/classes/dpkg-base.bbclass
>> b/meta/classes/dpkg-base.bbclass index 175dc80..5425df8 100644
>> --- a/meta/classes/dpkg-base.bbclass
>> +++ b/meta/classes/dpkg-base.bbclass
>> @@ -31,6 +31,10 @@ do_apt_fetch() {
>> fi
>> dpkg_do_mounts
>> E="${@ bb.utils.export_proxies(d)}"
>> + sudo -E chroot ${BUILDCHROOT_DIR} /usr/bin/apt-get update \
>> + -o
>> Dir::Etc::sourcelist="sources.list.d/isar-apt.list" \
>> + -o Dir::Etc::sourceparts="-" \
>> + -o APT::Get::List-Cleanup="0"
>> sudo -E chroot --userspec=$( id -u ):$( id -g )
>> ${BUILDCHROOT_DIR} \ sh -c 'cd ${PP} && apt-get -y source ${SRC_APT}'
>> dpkg_undo_mounts
>
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RDA IOT SES-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-11 12:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-11 9:33 Henning Schild
2019-02-11 9:35 ` Henning Schild
2019-02-11 10:50 ` chombourger
2019-02-11 12:53 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2019-02-11 13:33 ` chombourger
2019-02-18 14:16 ` Maxim Yu. Osipov
2019-02-11 18:08 ` Henning Schild
2019-02-26 15:00 ` Henning Schild
2019-02-26 15:03 ` Jan Kiszka
2019-03-05 10:11 ` Henning Schild
2019-02-18 22:01 ` Maxim Yu. Osipov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0ff54328-5b30-e645-619e-0eaac9c184b5@siemens.com \
--to=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=henning.schild@siemens.com \
--cc=isar-users@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox