Re: [PATCH v2] conf: Add support for new debian distro "buster"

[Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>]

On 2018-08-16 17:03, Henning Schild wrote:
> Am Thu, 16 Aug 2018 16:51:29 +0200
> schrieb Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>:
> 
>> On 2018-08-16 16:49, [ext] Henning Schild wrote:
>>> Am Thu, 16 Aug 2018 14:57:44 +0300
>>> schrieb "Maxim Yu. Osipov" <mosipov@ilbers.de>:
>>>    
>>>> Hi Henning,
>>>>
>>>> It seems that under jessie we have similar problem with unsupported
>>>> syscall with qemuarm as we had with qemuarm64 on stretch:
>>>>
>>>> cat
>>>> build/tmp/work/debian-buster-armhf/buildchroot-target/temp/log.do_build:
>>>> === Setting up libperl5.26:armhf (5.26.2-7) ...
>>>> Setting up man-db (2.8.4-2) ...
>>>> Building database of manual pages ...
>>>> qemu: Unsupported syscall: 383
>>>> ===
>>>>
>>>> May be it makes sense to exclude for now qemuarm from buster patch
>>>> (at least while we support jessie)?
>>>
>>> No. For arm64 i agree, we have that problem and can not build buster
>>> images from any distro < buster. But for arm we just have that
>>> problem for debian8 and not 9, so arm should be part of the patch.
>>
>> So, qemu-user-static from buster works fine? Is there possibly some
>> backport of that available for stretch?
> 
> I did not try that yet, and there do not seem to be backports.
> 

As it's "static", we would likely be fine with the buster package - 
provided that helps.

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RDA IOT SES-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux