From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-GM-THRID: 6499063932287713280 X-Received: by 10.80.230.25 with SMTP id y25mr3861663edm.9.1513326645218; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 00:30:45 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: isar-users@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.80.215.135 with SMTP id w7ls3171515edi.5.gmail; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 00:30:44 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBotjBOXkBa9Ft7nXjS6I6saHj3AthmR3cHYA+sN9FNjxyFlTjdq9fe9xiQNLcQHtyBbhz4z8 X-Received: by 10.80.174.140 with SMTP id e12mr3838011edd.12.1513326644712; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 00:30:44 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1513326644; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=rJ30fjbnbNZ7a0Iq6sRWUqr7eNaZlR7al26Nri1ZpmcM5cgoi8gTO6CRafhbsN2DlW HviFmKGuBVLnm+obady+zn4ddUunQIwiryDnmlXS8cpDqjW2XR/8CQ97JE30L/JZTKIZ wvbAC16X1/thkL4NAWLOw4AOm54F0ToCDIB0kfn4c//Di2xqN3rD5uSOxVv/DmFOfYPf kKMO/FOkc1YFOsQcCzF6VocEv33sAONlw8UhG1waxGPqwrlXgv4DA//DjWk4kIbzD9Wx M6TAbF2h6qgGrFjXnj52adrIZDn2snpCwOtI6r5ckNKIya3+N8+dEwgRXo3GKS8ZI7P3 LzOQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:date:to:from:subject:message-id :arc-authentication-results; bh=uFkNY2hqQPudoqNSSIOg3292IJ4LZFCEkam/u4JS6eE=; b=pBbRb20rNfutOMt2tdHDsCxFM7uFjRGPdTlt2qFFSC5K+hoL6h3FnMmVtRpBpi46rt u0Tm8K7lEQ6pTnae2WvqvEW/RqymImbZE+/mKPa4ujAv8JfPbP/kjmuUHVGlp/Cp+9OO gtDPbxtNi31nbIV5nQF8TTfCfpkTCnU9Rj+m5Nvv676nQHDx4J2wOsm9G+VB582jLanU hwKpzjwWpAPCnP3d40Awof34NsIGiBEV4iLAmzXY3Bmf/8gKCsFCPnRAqB7mKVSxMBi6 OwPyWueuTgQ9kA/t68wtAgXig2SS/6965oaO3nkUFngzVd8Z/Z+AesGNhIuR4rEJIQau zpug== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 2001:a60:0:28:0:1:25:1 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of ch@denx.de) smtp.mailfrom=ch@denx.de Return-Path: Received: from mail-out.m-online.net (mail-out.m-online.net. [2001:a60:0:28:0:1:25:1]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m7si638570edm.4.2017.12.15.00.30.44 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 15 Dec 2017 00:30:44 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 2001:a60:0:28:0:1:25:1 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of ch@denx.de) client-ip=2001:a60:0:28:0:1:25:1; Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 2001:a60:0:28:0:1:25:1 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of ch@denx.de) smtp.mailfrom=ch@denx.de Received: from frontend01.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.182]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3yykCS2X4Hz1qvnN; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 09:30:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.70]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3yykCS289Wz1qqts; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 09:30:44 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.70]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4xgBXEWq5Xxi; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 09:30:43 +0100 (CET) X-Auth-Info: 1lSkWh7mWOVt1rwb3xMUWH0+V2Q3H6Wgo9G7SPV/Jvc= Received: from orrorin (p578adb1c.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [87.138.219.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 09:30:43 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <1513326642.31110.83.camel@denx.de> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/1] Special debian depends entries From: Claudius Heine To: isar-users@googlegroups.com, Alexander Smirnov , Christian Storm , Jan Kiszka Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 09:30:42 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20171215080842.4075-1-ch@denx.de> References: <20171215080842.4075-1-ch@denx.de> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-O2mkjC7jFqshOYb83clm" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.26.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-TUID: uGlWTwI7u2nX --=-O2mkjC7jFqshOYb83clm Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2017-12-15 at 09:08 +0100, Claudius Heine wrote: > Hi, >=20 > here is a new version of my patch done with python code instead of > shell > code. Hi, Henning and me were currently discussing the options here, and we might need some referee to decide how to proceed: So the options are backwards compatibility vs. avoiding complexity. I think this code is not too complex, and backwards compatibility is nice to have. We don't know how many people use dpkg-raw and fixing it in a backwards compatible way saves time overall. Henning thinks that backwards compatibility is not an issue, because its easy to fix in the recipes and the complexity that goes with it has to be avoided, because there might be bugs inside, and we have to fix them over and over. Both vaild arguments IMO. Cheers, Claudius --=20 DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-54 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: ch@denx.de PGP key: 6FF2 E59F 00C6 BC28 31D8 64C1 1173 CB19 9808 B153 Keyserver: hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net --=-O2mkjC7jFqshOYb83clm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEb/LlnwDGvCgx2GTBEXPLGZgIsVMFAloziDIACgkQEXPLGZgI sVN34BAAqAN8Q+JON6/K8qafq9VxhqYbfRd26l2f1mFEnUMueFD4cR3dyVdxcwZI p0/DLwTZE7Cycj6H+BlB/x6FzgcOQDASIbkcrd38SHjdp6YpB3R9G21KSSEv7nxD aHcp3SgGf74wK8KU7q4IZ9ERZexdZM09ZUpUc7RbnzsZT0SKX54qvZUXNWrRaGQ1 WCvfqQOX8gsY0Sl+lsWbhS95aHSRK1nJdIDdqtKUXb1qRM/YnedXdjVsoFVLofv7 rK0FrRm55ZFgNcpSnTI77aRPE/63PTc2RR9PRmeImiqYBZVM80nWZP3N+jNLBNiS /pLJd5YyBnngX8oDQrXYm+CTrRBXcCj1tFm42Ki8wV5b5UVdivkWb+YaLyLCkSRW YKcRHualH3xTt4g63r4DL+Z3MDXWRMtVu/c7oVgxVdq1Z0ZhPExtKEkiZp0JJOIH gSgy91FzqyIxoOXkryy1et9va9e6iH0V9XXzOtdy7vz7IZ6SjznURisfq6StSVUE 4paFhAUGFmry4RZM4C+XKYBElkCEZTmiuMjRpb/3TY2VF8pXdJnSsOU/s5KFAra3 gEZ4SLyC23wX7H3u1NHbTMD+mrmh63w3zRG0M+f0iuIpnnGuGYre6t3U8OxX5fHC x4nCobgx24npWkT7Hz7zkTy2UA0D2XVaYcAUqkROSCSpUg1W7aA= =smm/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-O2mkjC7jFqshOYb83clm--