ISAR doesn't honor DL_DIR

ISAR doesn't honor DL_DIR

[Cirujano Cuesta, Silvano]

I'm moving here a discussion that I've inadvertently started in GitHub
with an issue: [1]

According to the Bitbake upstream documentation, the variable DL_DIR is
being honored. So I would expect ISAR to also honor it. But ISAR is not
honoring it in my setup.

Apparently Bitbake is honoring it in Yocto setups, meaning that Yocto
also honors it.

Is ISAR expected to honor it or not? Is it a bug in ISAR? Is it an
error in my setup?

Cheers,
 Silvano

[1] https://github.com/ilbers/isar/issues/43

Re: ISAR doesn't honor DL_DIR

[Jan Kiszka]

On 27.11.18 13:56, [ext] Cirujano Cuesta, Silvano wrote:
> I'm moving here a discussion that I've inadvertently started in GitHub
> with an issue: [1]
> 
> According to the Bitbake upstream documentation, the variable DL_DIR is
> being honored. So I would expect ISAR to also honor it. But ISAR is not
> honoring it in my setup.
> 
> Apparently Bitbake is honoring it in Yocto setups, meaning that Yocto
> also honors it.
> 
> Is ISAR expected to honor it or not? Is it a bug in ISAR? Is it an
> error in my setup?
> 

Isar and Bitbake, but help might be on the way, see 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/isar-users/840a2535ca72f3ff2c900b2ce111fa9f60c1ee84.camel%40denx.de

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RDA IOT SES-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux

Re: ISAR doesn't honor DL_DIR

[Baurzhan Ismagulov]

Hello Silvano,

On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 12:56:27PM +0000, Cirujano Cuesta, Silvano wrote:
> I'm moving here a discussion that I've inadvertently started in GitHub
> with an issue: [1]

Issues are good to have an overview of things to do; discussions are preferred
here to have a single archive to search.


> According to the Bitbake upstream documentation, the variable DL_DIR is
> being honored. So I would expect ISAR to also honor it. But ISAR is not
> honoring it in my setup.
> 
> Apparently Bitbake is honoring it in Yocto setups, meaning that Yocto
> also honors it.
> 
> Is ISAR expected to honor it or not? Is it a bug in ISAR? Is it an
> error in my setup?

The short answer is that I've never tried, and patches are welcome.

Conceptually, Isar is a user of BitBake. While Isar is explicitly not Yocto,
having a useful set of common options would be desirable.

I think adding DL_DIR support would be a useful feature.


With kind regards,
Baurzhan.

Re: ISAR doesn't honor DL_DIR

[Cirujano Cuesta, Silvano]

On Tue, 2018-11-27 at 14:27 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 27.11.18 13:56, [ext] Cirujano Cuesta, Silvano wrote:
> > I'm moving here a discussion that I've inadvertently started in
> > GitHub
> > with an issue: [1]
> > 
> > According to the Bitbake upstream documentation, the variable
> > DL_DIR is
> > being honored. So I would expect ISAR to also honor it. But ISAR is
> > not
> > honoring it in my setup.
> > 
> > Apparently Bitbake is honoring it in Yocto setups, meaning that
> > Yocto
> > also honors it.
> > 
> > Is ISAR expected to honor it or not? Is it a bug in ISAR? Is it an
> > error in my setup?
> > 
> 
> Isar and Bitbake, but help might be on the way, see 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/isar-users/840a2535ca72f3ff2c900b2c
> e111fa9f60c1ee84.camel%40denx.de
> 
> Jan
> 

What a timing!

Apparently I should have subscribed to the mailing list sooner. Now I'm
in ;-)

Silvano

--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RDA IOT SES-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux