Re: [PATCH 0/8] CI rework of gitlab fast job

["Moessbauer, Felix" <felix.moessbauer@siemens.com>]

On Fri, 2023-01-13 at 00:43 +0100, Henning Schild wrote:
> Am Thu, 12 Jan 2023 16:20:56 +0100
> schrieb Baurzhan Ismagulov <ibr@radix50.net>:
> 
> > On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 04:12:50PM +0100, Henning Schild wrote:
> > > Yes the two should be orthogonal at the moment. I am just making
> > > fast a bit faster and go deeper ... because it now boots.  
> > 
> > As "fast" should remain the maintainer testsuite, I'd like to
> > discuss
> > the coverage implications with Anton as well.
> 
> At the end of the day i want any variant of the testsuite to run on
> any
> setup just like it does on ilbers jenkins.

I fully agree. Currently it is really hard and time consuming to run
the testsuite, even just for basic tests.
> 
> That should be based on the kas containers for anyone not using your
> jenkins.

This would also help a lot, to run it locally.

> 
> With that any contributor would be able to run it manually or in
> their
> CI.

I guess this would also reduce the maintenance effort at Ilbers as less
patches would be sent to the ML which do not pass the CI.

Felix

> 
> We currently can not run "full" in gitlab CI because it takes too
> much
> time and our gitlab runners would take such jobs for at most 12h. But
> that is a value i could adjust if we find that it really needs to
> take
> that long. I hope we can get much faster and still have the same
> coverage.
> 
> Henning
> 
> > > Since there have been no other review comments so far, i will
> > > prepare that v2 where all the "remove from fast" will have a
> > > generic reason and will be squashed.  
> > 
> > Yes, would be good.
> > 
> > 
> > With kind regards,
> > Baurzhan.
>