public inbox for isar-users@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
To: Alexander Smirnov <asmirnov@ilbers.de>, isar-users@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] Isar cross-compilation support
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 21:45:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1ed1ad84-acaf-1aa9-0ac7-f2f1353670ab@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <507beff8-3503-22a9-c3f6-0a01f3f7a132@ilbers.de>

On 2018-07-17 17:41, Alexander Smirnov wrote:
> 
> 
> On 07/17/2018 04:38 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2018-07-17 15:18, Alexander Smirnov wrote:
>>> Hi everybody,
>>>
>>> sorry for the delay, this is the third version of cross-compilation
>>> support for Isar.
>>>
>>
>> Thanks for the update!
>>
>>> Supported targets for cross-compilation:
>>>   - stretch armhf
>>>   - stretch amd64
>>>
>>> Artifacts could be cross-compiled:
>>>   - dpkg.bbclass users
>>>   - dpkg-raw.bbclass users
>>>   - kernel
>>>
>>> Known issues:
>>>   - if target and host architectures are the same, there is no need
>>>     to use host buildchroot.
>>>   - kernel module doesn't support cross-compilation. Default
>>> linux-headers
>>>     package depends from target gcc binaries. So attempt to install, for
>>>     example linux-headers-armmp, tries to install gcc:armhf, what rises
>>>     conflict with the host tools.
>>
>> Could you imagine overriding such specialties with extra rules, even if
>> package specific? Not having kernel module in the cross compilation
>> chain main cause troubles (or does it work fine to cross-build the
>> kernel and then natively build the modules?).
> 
> What I'd like to try:
> 1. Add ARM defconfig for linux-cip
> 2. Try to build example module for linux-cip for armhf
> 
> Regarding overriding default Debian kernel, ATM I don't see any
> possibilities. Just as an exercise - I tried to install
> linux-headers-armmp:
> 
> $ sudo dpkg --add-architecture armhf
> $ sudo apt-get update
> $ sudo apt-get install linux-headers-armmp
> 
> No chances here, this package pulls lots of armhf binaries that conflict
> with the host ones. The only way I see now is to manually fetch and
> unpack this package. But it's an ugly hack IMHO :-(

But maybe we can resolve that issue for self-built kernel by providing
also a compatible headers package?

> 
> Regarding hybrid mode (apps and kernel are compiled cross, modules are
> compiled natively) - this works. You could check this by trying
> cross-build for qemuarm-stretch, for example.

I suppose to opt-out a package from cross-building, I need to add
ISAR_CROSS_COMPILE = "0" to its recipe, right? Currently trying... no:

| Broken jailhouse-build-deps:arm64 Depends on
linux-headers-jailhouse-arm64:arm64 < none @un H >
|   Removing jailhouse-build-deps:arm64 because I can't find
linux-headers-jailhouse-arm64:arm64

The problem seems to be that the header package is generate as :amd64,
so I can't install it into the arm64 buildchroot. However, the cross
build also fails because it searches for :arm64 as well:

| Broken jailhouse-cross-build-deps:arm64 Depends on
linux-headers-jailhouse-arm64:arm64 < none @un H >
|   Removing jailhouse-cross-build-deps:arm64 because I can't find
linux-headers-jailhouse-arm64:arm64

By requesting :amd64 versions of the header as well as some python deps,
I'm getting further and then fail differently:

| dpkg-architecture: warning: specified GNU system type
aarch64-linux-gnu does not match CC system type x86_64-linux-gnu, try
setting a correct CC environment variable
|  dpkg-source --before-build git
| dpkg-buildpackage: info: host architecture arm64
| dpkg-checkbuilddeps: error: Unmet build dependencies: python-pip:amd64
python-setuptools:amd64 python-mako:amd64

"host architecture arm64", that is suspicious...


And then python - I'm still facing that issue with another package as well:

| Setting up python2.7-minimal:arm64 (2.7.13-2+deb9u2) ...
| /var/lib/dpkg/info/python2.7-minimal.postinst: 42:
/var/lib/dpkg/info/python2.7-minimal.postinst: python2.7: not found
| dpkg: error processing package python2.7-minimal:arm64 (--configure):
|  subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit
status 127
| dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of python-minimal:arm64:
|  python-minimal:arm64 depends on python2.7-minimal (>= 2.7.13-1~);
however:
|   Package python2.7-minimal:arm64 is not configured yet.
|
| dpkg: error processing package python-minimal:arm64 (--configure):
|  dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
| Errors were encountered while processing:
|  python2.7-minimal:arm64
|  python-minimal:arm64
| E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

Corresponding build dependencies there:
Build-Depends: wget, cpio, unzip, rsync, python, bc

Here I get my job done by hacking it this way:
Build-Depends: wget, cpio, unzip, rsync, python:amd64, bc

Jan

  reply	other threads:[~2018-07-17 19:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-17 13:18 Alexander Smirnov
2018-07-17 13:18 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] isar-bootstrap: Update routine to determine host arch Alexander Smirnov
2018-07-17 13:18 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] buildchroot: Split generic part Alexander Smirnov
2018-07-17 13:18 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] buildchroot: Add host buildchroot Alexander Smirnov
2018-07-17 19:48   ` Jan Kiszka
2018-07-17 13:18 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] isar-bootstrap-helper: Add target architecture for dpkg Alexander Smirnov
2018-07-17 13:18 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] build.sh: Add additional parameter Alexander Smirnov
2018-07-17 13:18 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] cross-compilation: Introduce variable switch Alexander Smirnov
2018-07-17 13:18 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] linux: Add cross-compilation support Alexander Smirnov
2018-07-17 13:38 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] Isar " Jan Kiszka
2018-07-17 14:40   ` Jan Kiszka
2018-07-17 15:06     ` Alexander Smirnov
2018-07-17 15:18       ` Alexander Smirnov
2018-07-17 15:24         ` Jan Kiszka
2018-07-17 15:29           ` Alexander Smirnov
2018-07-17 15:41   ` Alexander Smirnov
2018-07-17 19:45     ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2018-07-17 20:48       ` Alexander Smirnov
2018-07-18  7:06         ` Jan Kiszka
2018-07-18  8:19           ` Jan Kiszka
2018-07-18  8:37             ` Jan Kiszka
2018-07-18 18:52           ` Alexander Smirnov
2018-07-18 19:00             ` Jan Kiszka
2018-07-19 20:59               ` Alexander Smirnov
2018-07-20  5:56                 ` Jan Kiszka
2018-07-22 20:15                   ` Alexander Smirnov
2018-07-22 20:32                     ` Alexander Smirnov
2018-07-22 21:54                       ` Jan Kiszka
2018-07-23  6:55                         ` Jan Kiszka
2018-07-24  8:21                         ` Jan Kiszka
2018-07-22 21:40                     ` Jan Kiszka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1ed1ad84-acaf-1aa9-0ac7-f2f1353670ab@siemens.com \
    --to=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
    --cc=asmirnov@ilbers.de \
    --cc=isar-users@googlegroups.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox