From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-GM-THRID: 6436797916976775168 X-Received: by 10.25.208.80 with SMTP id h77mr3702832lfg.23.1498769248690; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 13:47:28 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: isar-users@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.28.227.139 with SMTP id a133ls373896wmh.5.gmail; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 13:47:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.223.172.239 with SMTP id o102mr3954610wrc.17.1498769248194; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 13:47:28 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1498769248; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=aIrU9foHTAznOoro4XslYOzuB3xd0w2DadQjaDUL3MX+hoD92+bAhynPBFlsijckur FqqPfMTMsJ+dplBGAMa3x0/1JviI6514aIzC3++qn5+fbD4KkPsSnUkwjtcq9OivbXrx Q9uA/o9ivGv3d/TiWsRZWXh6b2I7bBn1+EczWmCgH4Rw5ha/9/OxFJQC2dazf+Ir7TKK gZX0DimYqShDrw2vwpJzyhh0dCjty3ilvPpZ9nrOByuhGf3hvKXHkQy4XP2w++WpFJLB UOyom9RMYq3AQ4uxBeB66arG8RptL2HHm8wXDdyJb/QSz1Yr53qYJTX5SNVSA7t12WPO yquQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references :mail-followup-to:message-id:subject:to:from:date :arc-authentication-results; bh=qu3744BbHxHjTMmtFKVW0CrLwC6TDGjlEvjWBpbVFls=; b=XhEJjO2Pc5HBkVx7DQb0nQ2wvuQ2UvLlkCAOWcblNinFGtrijTgUs55x8T9UsvH9FW 8tc/Jhqz0IWqzfZYDIK2dZF8wos26XoontY/8cZ2zgU5VJHK6zsMelDlhv003iGvpfXb qzY9YdyVsU6k873RkEJuUr50SEfUG7DDosdUl1fXLbm5JBtPaWK2eJlg6ej5QVuYj0// Ixfnoff9wdZvA7JFgpJk4IYPs4fzGyXYOEiujwAWUQg7crh04k0C+yRR3JFjbJzRjzdi r3VAxus3QoO5pam/J/NrsXWDavP+qIW0B0ctEUdBClBLM+TgpA7kuvTN7+0iAuW3eR/O HNyw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 85.214.62.211 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of ibr@radix50.net) smtp.mailfrom=ibr@radix50.net Return-Path: Received: from aqmola.ilbers.de (aqmola.ilbers.de. [85.214.62.211]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f125si616916wma.4.2017.06.29.13.47.28 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 29 Jun 2017 13:47:28 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 85.214.62.211 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of ibr@radix50.net) client-ip=85.214.62.211; Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 85.214.62.211 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of ibr@radix50.net) smtp.mailfrom=ibr@radix50.net Received: from yssyq.radix50.net (dslb-178-007-066-052.178.007.pools.vodafone-ip.de [178.7.66.52]) (authenticated bits=0) by aqmola.ilbers.de (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4+deb7u1) with ESMTP id v5TKlPBw022162 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 22:47:27 +0200 Received: from yssyq.radix50.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by yssyq.radix50.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8) with ESMTP id v5TKlKEG004908 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 22:47:20 +0200 Received: (from ibr@localhost) by yssyq.radix50.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id v5TKlK9d004907 for isar-users@googlegroups.com; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 22:47:20 +0200 Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 22:47:20 +0200 From: Baurzhan Ismagulov To: isar-users@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Development branch updates Message-ID: <20170629204720.GB4317@yssyq.radix50.net> Mail-Followup-To: isar-users@googlegroups.com References: <20170628210313.GA3941@yssyq.radix50.net> <71b64d59-76df-61cb-b931-96bee98ce543@siemens.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <71b64d59-76df-61cb-b931-96bee98ce543@siemens.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-TUID: dJSLNhjhDZdY On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 04:33:07PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > > multiconfig:qemuamd64:isar-image-base is buildable again. > > qemu-amd64 Yes, lenormf/uefi_wic_amd64-20170428 has qemu-amd64, and lenormf/develop-l20170602-dpkg-cross has qemuamd64. First, the idea was to have nice GNU-like triplets, such as qemu-amd64-stretch. However, when we looked at Yocto's runqemu, we noticed that their machines are in form of qemuamd64. I tend to move to the former and sacrifice the Yocto style familiar to some people in favor of readable, explicit (and, hopefully, complete) names. I think leaving the machines without the dash and configurations with one wouldn't be good, either. > BTW, the machine seems to be QEMU-agnostic -> rename to generic-amd64 or so? That's an interesting idea, never thought of that. Thanks for the fresh view :) . One part of the issue is, the naming reflects how we test it. > > I'll be cherry-picking amd64, stretch and UEFI from > > lenormf/develop-l20170602-dpkg-cross into master. > > This seems to work fine for Internet. Proxies are biting us here (as > usual), but this topic is bigger: I tried to pass http_proxy env down to > multistrap, but there are still many places where it gets lost. Does https://github.com/ilbers/isar/pull/4 help? I'm afraid, we'll end up with https://github.com/ilbers/isar/issues/19. > What I noticed is that I cannot overwrite DISTRO_APT_SOURCE in > local.conf with a local mirror because of > > DISTRO_APT_SOURCE = "..." > > Any reason why we should not make them all > > DISTRO_APT_SOURCE ??= "..." > > ? Or is the plan rather to allow setting a set of mirrors and let the > machinery pull from them when available, without local.conf overwrites? Will have a look. https://github.com/ilbers/isar/issues/20 With kind regards, Baurzhan.