From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-GM-THRID: 6449247988281769984 X-Received: by 10.25.193.77 with SMTP id r74mr2454826lff.14.1503389939444; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 01:18:59 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: isar-users@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.25.206.68 with SMTP id e65ls738501lfg.13.gmail; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 01:18:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.46.80.88 with SMTP id v24mr2494186ljd.0.1503389938999; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 01:18:58 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1503389938; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=DtHVB2LUtPaZr6WqS5gyDWa+OlkQ+7ssiOepIaTLyyag3no432ofys5daDpuYUkZjs d8Bdl+IJPI1OknjdXFRBqrtHfRbDtjjZKb72pDJe4h95BGfMjSPCFNRCQAsW2pFbHHHP njlC4YaQAIYRrSDX9Yzz1z5yJBlsG5/LFOGatVle3ASmgKMk0cIfLDizepEE+DVYgVx5 Yyhv5pr+bm9SmnGYLh7fQdt359Rw8osEDWcjf+adPbEBurubeS9j7H9ZKIMuiFpr3MXh NJeialSg/puEQbhHgj59g2plD47pWf98Jv3HlgkveFAs6gc3j/H0+SoT5pegOegj7heK 11cQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:arc-authentication-results; bh=iemI6KCrLTgbhXXcif2UJm64Ilxy4k6Xa0uXM5fZYb0=; b=XmsfOtpZ5/pqopj5UFXQdgWyTVG+6wIUzKSuGxLN6q+DShVJNXZAxpSBeAiJPi+bWk kQXvVpNqjGVE4s2gLfwST3oTzYgJP2pcgVlp00gzYDXtR9lSb2ynyesdVL29BeLMx8a4 QLenOHGQhm4i8GFv0cmQ0mpaJVj0Su3gmQoCvqrcvNImFDuvpMAz6ZsnuOBZHZxXTK0r Z6xL/bPNeg2QKgjGYMrtn46uAaW3NokSGW6XQR8JRzbKYs+r8xAdoA9sTwkwmTjko6ej NGpYz0aW4465yffC9iMBbLDMspCf/XZcBKqnvWA0uo/FtSC94mcKq82YufvOw+R0y/56 J+Vg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 192.35.17.28 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of henning.schild@siemens.com) smtp.mailfrom=henning.schild@siemens.com Return-Path: Received: from goliath.siemens.de (goliath.siemens.de. [192.35.17.28]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k84si3257184wmh.5.2017.08.22.01.18.58 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 22 Aug 2017 01:18:58 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 192.35.17.28 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of henning.schild@siemens.com) client-ip=192.35.17.28; Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 192.35.17.28 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of henning.schild@siemens.com) smtp.mailfrom=henning.schild@siemens.com Received: from mail3.siemens.de (mail3.siemens.de [139.25.208.14]) by goliath.siemens.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id v7M8Iw3v021234 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 22 Aug 2017 10:18:58 +0200 Received: from md1em3qc ([139.25.68.40]) by mail3.siemens.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v7M8IwUw027362; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 10:18:58 +0200 Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2017 10:19:09 +0200 From: Henning Schild To: Baurzhan Ismagulov Cc: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0-10 of 16 v2 6/8] classes: move fetch and unpack into isar-base Message-ID: <20170822101909.2c9fd395@md1em3qc> In-Reply-To: <20170821202738.GB3711@yssyq.radix50.net> References: <7c03d914f33ef0563cb7af2951f56e8cd5fd20bc.1501760818.git.henning.schild@siemens.com> <20170808100025.02645738@md1em3qc> <20170808140150.17be7599@md1em3qc> <20170821202738.GB3711@yssyq.radix50.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TUID: KjSKRp2C/h3S Am Mon, 21 Aug 2017 22:27:38 +0200 schrieb Baurzhan Ismagulov : > On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 02:01:50PM +0200, Henning Schild wrote: > > Ok. If you want me to turn it into two commits i will do so. But > > please tell me what to do. > > Applied partially, thanks. Please revert or remove me as author, thanks. Henning > The baseline for rebase is master. It will eventually include > asmirnov/next, so right now, you could start rebasing on that. > > > > Especially since i would not know which branch to rebase on now that > > you even split my patches. > > This allows us to take low-hanging fruits and avoid reviewing the > stuff again, especially since this series consists of unrelated bits > -- please avoid in the future. A binary all-or-nothing approach would > block all patches. If you prefer that way, I'd suggest to talk > offline so that we can understand the reasons for that. > > > With kind regards, > Baurzhan. >