Re: [PATCH 0-10 of 16 v2 4/8] meta: conf: use bitbake.conf from bitbake and apply local changes

[Baurzhan Ismagulov <ibr@radix50.net>]

On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 01:46:30PM +0200, Henning Schild wrote:
> > * If there is a problem, please articulate expectations; that would
> > allow us to address them (unlike e.g. just a request to revert).
> 
> In this very example i did request the revert earlier, with reasoning.

For this example, I had got the reasoning. I still hope we can bring
communication harmony to the next level ;) .


> And i got tired of repeating myself and mails not beeing read
> carefully or at all, also not for the first time.

This can be frustrating. I hope the following could help understanding why.

* Patch processing takes time.

* The order depends on the effort and may not be sequential.

* If you see no response, it can have various reasons.

  * Accusing people is harmful.

  * What would help is taking one specific issue and bringing it to a certain
    result.

  * Many parallel threads are ineffective.

  * Asking about all outstanding issues altogether is ineffective.

  * Negative result is also a result. One reason for dead threads is the loop
    where the participants don't change their opinions but continue looping
    over the same arguments.


With kind regards,
Baurzhan.