From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-GM-THRID: 6499063932287713280 X-Received: by 10.25.67.93 with SMTP id m29mr97016lfj.27.1514995712167; Wed, 03 Jan 2018 08:08:32 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: isar-users@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.46.16.68 with SMTP id j65ls3800722lje.5.gmail; Wed, 03 Jan 2018 08:08:31 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBouDZuXg9DUjs+G000VYrbGQnVlZNC3DHyV9y3JvyEbJRSBB/yy8kWu/bYu24nJC95bMa7jD X-Received: by 10.25.205.74 with SMTP id d71mr98541lfg.16.1514995711714; Wed, 03 Jan 2018 08:08:31 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1514995711; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=u2+RmgOUtHNanINHE8qoywKcNdR0YiLkP0XSum9XW+SrWH6k+XRA2lhOPQFkx68elE l9RRISU92qTk47JdoEGS5yzLAd2P5NE5AZU4yUzCpBc2098/pDz3c+fvfwwIDPQLlh+7 3pPCRC5x8UoHehYCZkfN0QInAqVUql/ejcgwkDs8XRdsPnwmKXev5nUlUOf2NexI9dn9 4LtDvxuiNAag9nT/AhSLIPcOWNMo2Cg02NyumN/TXDI6ePYrNM2KAOyh79hnBP0jUde2 2whNa1q/4KC1d9SutTrFwq0VcSnYJPFyH+C+O31GZ82SGmDLSYROogDsIFIGUbBfEPvI txWg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:arc-authentication-results; bh=SMkQkiwlIqK5xTFrzP1upWYfWw7ZHSy2r5BGPb8XnzQ=; b=aaFHvWy9SbikuB3Ll0wl9AEAWUFxQIJtdhaoXzi6+QEkFIQLIq3MsLqWXcW3ot7YA3 mPCTIBwjUrgz17o4EEh8QLxlOY+R/3eqCKO8GmDwgyRgClxoW3P0A1NGrXNCf8ncrst9 EI8JoY6MYTmQofMa2Ds71hXmCNdnswJfBgfxfwXce/UqiR0MavtT2ryPstD6m3Geu6bl o9buKoYdCWpvKRSE1PwgXMOFrkDvPEzW8PIQz9tpGRTRXZvchrKHQ/Ht7/OUQRCnnKUp ciLEMdG1Ir/6Ovp4v1OeyFlZZ10xM3jTaUvHAo7euL6j8UvRTBczwSw+aABtvZtFfh2G 0YCA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of henning.schild@siemens.com designates 192.35.17.14 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=henning.schild@siemens.com Return-Path: Received: from david.siemens.de (david.siemens.de. [192.35.17.14]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y16si155408lje.2.2018.01.03.08.08.31 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 03 Jan 2018 08:08:31 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of henning.schild@siemens.com designates 192.35.17.14 as permitted sender) client-ip=192.35.17.14; Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of henning.schild@siemens.com designates 192.35.17.14 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=henning.schild@siemens.com Received: from mail2.siemens.de (mail2.siemens.de [139.25.208.11]) by david.siemens.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w03G8UEl013869 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 3 Jan 2018 17:08:30 +0100 Received: from mmd1pvb1c.ad001.siemens.net (md1pvb1c.ad001.siemens.net [139.25.68.40] (may be forged)) by mail2.siemens.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w03G8Ul1030678; Wed, 3 Jan 2018 17:08:30 +0100 Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2018 17:08:29 +0100 From: Henning Schild To: Claudius Heine , Alexander Smirnov , Christian Storm , Jan Kiszka Cc: Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/1] Special debian depends entries Message-ID: <20180103170829.538dc2d2@mmd1pvb1c.ad001.siemens.net> In-Reply-To: <1513326642.31110.83.camel@denx.de> References: <20171215080842.4075-1-ch@denx.de> <1513326642.31110.83.camel@denx.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.15.0-dirty (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TUID: ZCYv0woCzABA Am Fri, 15 Dec 2017 09:30:42 +0100 schrieb Claudius Heine : > On Fri, 2017-12-15 at 09:08 +0100, Claudius Heine wrote: > > Hi, > > > > here is a new version of my patch done with python code instead of > > shell > > code. > > Hi, > > Henning and me were currently discussing the options here, and we > might need some referee to decide how to proceed: > > So the options are backwards compatibility vs. avoiding complexity. > > I think this code is not too complex, and backwards compatibility is > nice to have. We don't know how many people use dpkg-raw and fixing it > in a backwards compatible way saves time overall. > > Henning thinks that backwards compatibility is not an issue, because > its easy to fix in the recipes and the complexity that goes with it > has to be avoided, because there might be bugs inside, and we have to > fix them over and over. > > Both vaild arguments IMO. Alex, are you waiting for someone to jump in on this? Maybe you should just call it and merge one of the two patches. With the introduction of BASE_APT Isar might have to actually understand/use the contents of DEBIAN_DEPENDS. And in this case it might make sense to format it in a way that is bitbake-friendly and stick with space-separation and the patch Claudius suggested. Henning > Cheers, > Claudius >