From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-GM-THRID: 6512735219065290752 X-Received: by 10.80.146.139 with SMTP id k11mr3388299eda.4.1516370535227; Fri, 19 Jan 2018 06:02:15 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: isar-users@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.80.203.77 with SMTP id h13ls826199edi.3.gmail; Fri, 19 Jan 2018 06:02:13 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBot7bM+JE4ZZBaIsRkW6MFj/e1zeF1F9LPXTjjnXdSQqBGDgKCDscviErgCL88iCvkTknTB5 X-Received: by 10.80.242.130 with SMTP id f2mr3382608edm.5.1516370533230; Fri, 19 Jan 2018 06:02:13 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1516370533; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=o51Cdy4pFUUMjdPnZXcWHckDZW9LqKBJO6ktKnG9AuOhtbJVXu5jfD/h+Jxmklrrdd T4cLgH7sNcQmCr0XJkrDL1bM5Zc+AcAGmPzdHbumV58lXxNCtZM0aIHKFpuyWbcdtMjD lkCgARUytb+0FpH37fAIYK6DzghhSWSCEKMMEdJEhEN4LvugaMJPXZsEjQg+c6BGPfBw ctIOlTJZzMeqSA/3e7swJY3rPV16ImtFk/PlEUWBYZau/2er4GWx4VqStFw7DSeHure3 fMfhl3wge9ZokXrlArkwQA4/tHYJ0UCJOiw4tjwFqKYTxbk5iKx91rCf6nBH+uAW0iK+ ERwg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=user-agent:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:to :from:date:arc-authentication-results; bh=9RWbbLgrlAmSBY/+3bRWGW8RG096oDt275l2MR05lLU=; b=ogn2NdOoeq5QOV0P0sEWfnOw3vwANlyQHcJH/LJ6W3Uo5jnlocWwwCz8M+ViCt+GiF rsKJ1IiXDPkZNLRkiIuiSRP2jtpKPplmivCGbf2PZJwTYATm+2Y4sAUGXSKlYXAjbot1 HD4BVcozfSe6cNA8Vmyuz4gAuwyQXExbhzcnvzzfevkkhy+0LufG1ZvhjOwybjN34ejX f6ztDWS7wmEAF9FoQuiUQMknQvw3AgjtvQJcckrn8/S4JKU/T0j7gc2q9KrpG8g7BnV4 spTVTVA7cUd40COMeIVGaP5yxn9Tm8r2wE5IJ2gMDSrJfpg6DfE7TwkDYe6oZRM/kR6z SJOg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 85.214.62.211 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of ibr@radix50.net) smtp.mailfrom=ibr@radix50.net Return-Path: Received: from aqmola.ilbers.de (aqmola.ilbers.de. [85.214.62.211]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f16si1299912edj.2.2018.01.19.06.02.13 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 19 Jan 2018 06:02:13 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 85.214.62.211 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of ibr@radix50.net) client-ip=85.214.62.211; Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 85.214.62.211 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of ibr@radix50.net) smtp.mailfrom=ibr@radix50.net Received: from yssyq.radix50.net (p2E51BF2A.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [46.81.191.42]) (authenticated bits=0) by aqmola.ilbers.de (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4+deb7u1) with ESMTP id w0JE2ADb030790 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 19 Jan 2018 15:02:12 +0100 Received: from yssyq.radix50.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by yssyq.radix50.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8) with ESMTP id w0JE2ASX013638 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 19 Jan 2018 15:02:10 +0100 Received: (from ibr@localhost) by yssyq.radix50.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id w0JE2Ak0013637 for isar-users@googlegroups.com; Fri, 19 Jan 2018 15:02:10 +0100 Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2018 15:02:10 +0100 From: Baurzhan Ismagulov To: isar-users@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: proper wic integration Message-ID: <20180119140210.GA9026@yssyq.radix50.net> References: <20180119131851.18e54629@mmd1pvb1c.ad001.siemens.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-9 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20180119131851.18e54629@mmd1pvb1c.ad001.siemens.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-TUID: XB46NxvDvDlq On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 01:18:51PM +0100, Henning Schild wrote: > i started looking into intetgrating wic into the build process. And i > have a first working version of that code. > On the way i found that Isar is using a massively messed-with version > of wic. In my point of view that is an absolute show-blocker for any > code that builds on top of that. It depends on your priorities. Our goal at ilbers is to give people working code first, merge with upstream second. > Before anything gets done with wic, we need to revert all patches that > touch wic. We should not have a fork of wic but use an unmodified > version of it. I agree with the latter. If you come up with an implementation that does it without modifying wic, we'd gladly review it. Before that, nothing will be reverted in master. > So this mail is just to let you know that i am looking into that. Thanks, this is important to know. > A first working commit can be found here: > https://github.com/henning-schild-work/isar/commit/eeba383177a95bf8b03cba70e1525f65813b4df5 The commit comment contains dirty words. Please use respectful expressions and tone. > To get that merged i will first move to an untouched version of wic and > rebase it on top of that. That is fine with me. With kind regards, -- Baurzhan Ismagulov ilbers GmbH Baierbrunner Str. 28c D-81379 M�nchen +49 (89) 122 67 24-0 ibr@ilbers.de http://ilbers.de/ Amtsgericht M�nchen, HRB 214197 Gesch�ftsf�hrer: Baurzhan Ismagulov