From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-GM-THRID: 6512735219065290752 X-Received: by 10.223.139.86 with SMTP id v22mr1371256wra.11.1516371318067; Fri, 19 Jan 2018 06:15:18 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: isar-users@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.28.206.133 with SMTP id e127ls348564wmg.10.canary-gmail; Fri, 19 Jan 2018 06:15:17 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBovsdf3HUKwezTcEE2g2xtwtMEROpp3M/bR16aCFzy4c3tPEaV7Dd9/K/5t1uFbo5vx2xquf X-Received: by 10.28.178.207 with SMTP id b198mr1250235wmf.0.1516371317574; Fri, 19 Jan 2018 06:15:17 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1516371317; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=C8Ez5+5KgzY2XezdARdiqMt6E6UtRjIbuDn1blVWW2IPgjQgCGvQQL7/y+0KVIhWhH w/qMNrKUAsAHTpibVrMd0jcxjYEx8vlL6pMkjsp4Lf023qesj2vG7cnse9LCPLRoXK3U zM/qisfDcSYqyKxnrCsdwoREDotWSsVU/WViEhbQjyb7m6vqxhem8F/fjZg/RmP0tU3q 3q38mQ5iQsIliHq0Ru9kiZkGQT554siI0AjdO0M0SG/Q/pDEEOY0N+uBXELItJNR7O/3 /D8UyrfnwAT5SzERGDKmMYjjFtyvSfWzz8GCxZYN10LTzM3F+zjTwGj6+bV5RhFcsvP4 SH0A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:arc-authentication-results; bh=2BjIXP8R1CbMIlmA+zJux0oe0leqToOw4ylwxqnTe3Y=; b=q1JfKVTsfF6zu0WNkEww7B2N18xpmji/6coxZ9AOyJvr0Zx88BzkBu/5Cq1IafPgCT q/X5UKMwZMFZqYd2Odj/XeYhAbJE3w3C6LTiF9fzGJxw4om3YGRzTQqxKl1K79FCxv6m BcdBqirA0mS9+DTBuTvPejkGhE9Z61MU0Cl2RgAxNIyHompuwZgD9lmaS7SN5an1qkwZ JuuoFFyMCt7eCelO85BYKzJw1xpPfYTkKVx2Wlm52ftWuAH0nojpSL+23zpxavzubEWu hkYJ1rR71eFvYLKwtRv2R3BmLVgp1eACMZgGHfqQDja2YnV+t5SHPukUc5nXT7Px9XF1 m8jA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of henning.schild@siemens.com designates 192.35.17.28 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=henning.schild@siemens.com Return-Path: Received: from goliath.siemens.de (goliath.siemens.de. [192.35.17.28]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 44si1368757wrk.0.2018.01.19.06.15.17 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 19 Jan 2018 06:15:17 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of henning.schild@siemens.com designates 192.35.17.28 as permitted sender) client-ip=192.35.17.28; Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of henning.schild@siemens.com designates 192.35.17.28 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=henning.schild@siemens.com Received: from mail1.siemens.de (mail1.siemens.de [139.23.33.14]) by goliath.siemens.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w0JEFHSg032278 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 19 Jan 2018 15:15:17 +0100 Received: from mmd1pvb1c.ad001.siemens.net (md1pvb1c.ad001.siemens.net [139.25.68.40] (may be forged)) by mail1.siemens.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w0JEFHD7025875; Fri, 19 Jan 2018 15:15:17 +0100 Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2018 15:15:16 +0100 From: Henning Schild To: Baurzhan Ismagulov Cc: Subject: Re: proper wic integration Message-ID: <20180119151516.209bb4b9@mmd1pvb1c.ad001.siemens.net> In-Reply-To: <20180119140210.GA9026@yssyq.radix50.net> References: <20180119131851.18e54629@mmd1pvb1c.ad001.siemens.net> <20180119140210.GA9026@yssyq.radix50.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.15.0-dirty (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TUID: Mu1FArZ9MtaP Am Fri, 19 Jan 2018 15:02:10 +0100 schrieb Baurzhan Ismagulov : > On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 01:18:51PM +0100, Henning Schild wrote: > > i started looking into intetgrating wic into the build process. And > > i have a first working version of that code. > > On the way i found that Isar is using a massively messed-with > > version of wic. In my point of view that is an absolute > > show-blocker for any code that builds on top of that. > > It depends on your priorities. Our goal at ilbers is to give people > working code first, merge with upstream second. > > > > Before anything gets done with wic, we need to revert all patches > > that touch wic. We should not have a fork of wic but use an > > unmodified version of it. > > I agree with the latter. If you come up with an implementation that > does it without modifying wic, we'd gladly review it. Before that, > nothing will be reverted in master. Of cause not, i will send the reverts with the working code. > > So this mail is just to let you know that i am looking into that. > > Thanks, this is important to know. That is why i shared an early version of my work. > > A first working commit can be found here: > > https://github.com/henning-schild-work/isar/commit/eeba383177a95bf8b03cba70e1525f65813b4df5 > > The commit comment contains dirty words. Please use respectful > expressions and tone. Yes sorry about that, that where comments that where not supposed to leave my local branch. > > To get that merged i will first move to an untouched version of wic > > and rebase it on top of that. > > That is fine with me. I came up with something that comes very close, only one tiny bit missing with fsck failing for some reason. https://github.com/henning-schild-work/isar/commits/henning/staging Henning > > With kind regards,