From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-GM-THRID: 6512735219065290752 X-Received: by 10.28.190.2 with SMTP id o2mr840795wmf.2.1516803583749; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 06:19:43 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: isar-users@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.28.84.19 with SMTP id i19ls2767684wmb.10.gmail; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 06:19:43 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x227EiArKM7kp1OTLQqgQp67ZIm8sXFRDdHOLDMJ6x3glxfq6lr0IMSiHnLZ8Nou9ubLAwC+7 X-Received: by 10.28.106.25 with SMTP id f25mr704311wmc.16.1516803583219; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 06:19:43 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1516803583; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=SKgnDNslatgG9ICsHnnMDE8Z3lAayKfI+Q4AeJIwgadji2kLRHTBrGeb1e5ZnOu+EU Nqzi6hDUdwjMgPV9TWtfcDN4TLtOlGGL0t9qbPf6zV75Kbp2wvrsY91TKc2BfazGxDsA CkOLedWcZU+RFwGGSzPNO2uM+gTaFNKUi44yHxtMJ+cy/t6+UWbXaco/90N834gfevM3 nnLdDAdxqrjE6w0ZDxMc+hjIGSO60ZKKrOZhr2Xe6XB0byxbqFc3x7LfMQ039hAQXDzm TeE01WpItDG+EXxVZP1IuSHiNovacgg05P9R8IzuxfwGHPnALKiap07u8k78LDrdkKX+ YB/w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references :mail-followup-to:message-id:subject:to:from:date :arc-authentication-results; bh=VJ5Q0Y6DtjpIRAFuBnyb06LOS0q3t4bTZHzkl7GIk+8=; b=Jb8IgFBCsOtw/gD9HuoQ9hl4YNLaaQ8LnBXBFKkOcgonjMl/3ecUzYVHPUzttvQxko Kc5nKyJQXhcXv8LwEXG7y7aYEPTZTe9hcL4VNHRhr6Fbef8es0dRwK0qWn3SEEbq28EL XoVIRpKlUVanGASkVTBdIrIKrsubHB0ZVZBIhr+OGUeCgjjoqscG3uuEGwLTyA9vqniY Q7vbCnV2VODN5D5/6egkK6k0Pq/N+zN06eGMprcMuWdDoAL4gxqOlV0JnXAod5L4+VnO JPP2kdinUm9aTGQWYWRt5z6OpzSRYhzkk0IgzWqXtd/4ZdcyQFYxJBJ259YmfblMkg/O M/yA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 85.214.62.211 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of ibr@radix50.net) smtp.mailfrom=ibr@radix50.net Return-Path: Received: from aqmola.ilbers.de (aqmola.ilbers.de. [85.214.62.211]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f8si31359wmc.2.2018.01.24.06.19.43 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 24 Jan 2018 06:19:43 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 85.214.62.211 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of ibr@radix50.net) client-ip=85.214.62.211; Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 85.214.62.211 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of ibr@radix50.net) smtp.mailfrom=ibr@radix50.net Received: from yssyq.radix50.net (p2E51B0DF.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [46.81.176.223]) (authenticated bits=0) by aqmola.ilbers.de (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4+deb7u1) with ESMTP id w0OEJffY017321 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 15:19:42 +0100 Received: from yssyq.radix50.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by yssyq.radix50.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8) with ESMTP id w0OEJeYc009052 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 15:19:40 +0100 Received: (from ibr@localhost) by yssyq.radix50.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id w0OEJeYX009051 for isar-users@googlegroups.com; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 15:19:40 +0100 Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 15:19:40 +0100 From: Baurzhan Ismagulov To: isar-users@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: proper wic integration Message-ID: <20180124141940.GE6434@yssyq.radix50.net> Mail-Followup-To: isar-users@googlegroups.com References: <20180119131851.18e54629@mmd1pvb1c.ad001.siemens.net> <20180123115459.GB4542@yssyq.radix50.net> <1258d45d-e88b-974f-dc20-dccacbfa6fc3@siemens.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1258d45d-e88b-974f-dc20-dccacbfa6fc3@siemens.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-TUID: htHosZCcd0uk On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 01:46:25PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote: > >> To get that merged i will first move to an untouched version of wic and > >> rebase it on top of that. > > > > I'd strongly suggest that you clean up this version so that it is merged and > > Christian can use it, and refactor wic in a separate series. > > Patches are there, they surely need some cleanups, but I don't see your > point in reordering. As discussed offline, looking from outside: 1. Wic build integration is finished, 2. wic refactoring is going to start. So, looking from outside, providing 2, then 1 is reordering, not the other way around :) . The point is, as usual, moving in small steps. But let's see Henning's motivation for that. With kind regards, Baurzhan.