From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-GM-THRID: 6517147827419742208 X-Received: by 10.28.160.20 with SMTP id j20mr3504861wme.29.1517397864559; Wed, 31 Jan 2018 03:24:24 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: isar-users@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.223.154.77 with SMTP id z71ls1513671wrb.7.gmail; Wed, 31 Jan 2018 03:24:24 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x226UEvcimeDDjl6hMuhLx4u7+Z6dZ9y7LtCcdqLGPqavfvHa41ARSPWHHskcmfWAl9HkB1E1 X-Received: by 10.28.52.133 with SMTP id b127mr3324987wma.13.1517397864181; Wed, 31 Jan 2018 03:24:24 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1517397864; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=flHJwJP6Qb1uzA0ZkMPoOKSiZTvyu5c9xkjh15tXmL5n+oYnRUjV31dVKRqhn7+BGy GO12+d2TMgnMBsBmhcorcT+K6JziWLw0LX7ISTpWdLizUAs+GHiEJV4Ls654gmUAQGdB MGAnLUHKOowF759bl3ke4zGrK599nvToHeMKQ8FBx2+y15tE/ZAEMZnD/9cjalLk2i9n FpOD08jCKnyPIu1WSnJbbWcR8tVn1QMvO1x5X8+uZYb2VUNvH/M4dYpkzF28jjvvnBlY Jf8Dg9laT8/AKSu6TYu1aCKGPPRApPE181AekQomKAO22AEY6zFlV5aSKVSkV/4A7Yd/ QdDw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references :mail-followup-to:message-id:subject:to:from:date :arc-authentication-results; bh=ElNWsp0HyVUTQNH9sTxUmkT+d6jYutJLowLjAhTFcN0=; b=mNrOoosjdOxf1acz01BPloOYIFnsuPu7iucnvc/rjtzC7JN1WwyMqJxgnCp+RbNloy juEl1Ki7WyVRHzt3eS5AADoksc6KDXI0ANYmte161hN+BsejObpH/mRGxsMTq7sr4KDl NClEO1APq4hLvi06v1tHSnLYOhQmxz8ZwSRJ4NXTYem6blQETJe+30y3RL2A4Z271C9s LV9ICeowcZ8N0Wqw1YEvhup//PnASs6P1ilC29MnBkophkdmeyPC/aR0jwynCD4T4j5I 8rBhc1lMx5r/9fgb3uGBMM8uiRA9pm/SoZbBJ8fBbf/u1I5yo0W7l9KnIsBZdHi9jnSw NzPg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 85.214.62.211 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of ibr@radix50.net) smtp.mailfrom=ibr@radix50.net Return-Path: Received: from aqmola.ilbers.de (aqmola.ilbers.de. [85.214.62.211]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a12si550971wmg.4.2018.01.31.03.24.23 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 31 Jan 2018 03:24:24 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 85.214.62.211 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of ibr@radix50.net) client-ip=85.214.62.211; Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 85.214.62.211 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of ibr@radix50.net) smtp.mailfrom=ibr@radix50.net Received: from yssyq.radix50.net (p2E51B2CC.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [46.81.178.204]) (authenticated bits=0) by aqmola.ilbers.de (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4+deb7u1) with ESMTP id w0VBOL52008080 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 31 Jan 2018 12:24:23 +0100 Received: from yssyq.radix50.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by yssyq.radix50.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8) with ESMTP id w0VBOL6h008863 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 31 Jan 2018 12:24:21 +0100 Received: (from ibr@localhost) by yssyq.radix50.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id w0VBOLBE008862 for isar-users@googlegroups.com; Wed, 31 Jan 2018 12:24:21 +0100 Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 12:24:21 +0100 From: Baurzhan Ismagulov To: isar-users@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] first wic integration Message-ID: <20180131112421.GA6508@yssyq.radix50.net> Mail-Followup-To: isar-users@googlegroups.com References: <20180131111253.49011346@mmd1pvb1c.ad001.siemens.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180131111253.49011346@mmd1pvb1c.ad001.siemens.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-TUID: XGwYDo/Iav03 On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 11:12:53AM +0100, Henning Schild wrote: > There are no changes. Calling wic manually as non-root does not work > anymore, but that might be unrelated. Well, that's a change, and a user-visible one. > If the manual non-root call did work before, i will look into that. Yes. Yes, please do. In Yocto, manual non-root call works. The same is our vision for Isar. For now, it has been workarounded with sudo. We have a working PoC based on PRoot in the pipeline. So I don't support the idea of changing the user experience because of this issue. We'll be looking at your changes in more detail. Before that, I have a conceptual question. You revert the following patches: b1511ec wic: Work around mcopy error 17f9196 wic: Introduce the `WicExecError` exception class All of them are not related to the bitbake core and fix concrete issues with image generation that were not addressed in the baseline bitbake. Did you address those issues in your new changes? With kind regards, Baurzhan.