From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-GM-THRID: 6517147827419742208 X-Received: by 10.28.237.21 with SMTP id l21mr3393987wmh.32.1517407310715; Wed, 31 Jan 2018 06:01:50 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: isar-users@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.28.193.79 with SMTP id r76ls1116401wmf.3.gmail; Wed, 31 Jan 2018 06:01:50 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x224TFSViaYECsq5EWpxxmgJI0cMO/UBH362EOQhNz/d9nWnGiPgjxqeGol4UZemiKQ+npU8Y X-Received: by 10.223.182.4 with SMTP id f4mr3427788wre.32.1517407310275; Wed, 31 Jan 2018 06:01:50 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1517407310; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=fJYjs3xzmP8SYwwiRQ+YkHx4uxVxFmJNxlwc71M0OLFiTJdHMxN8Qx4iM60cXS//SO v1K1kJ4t7I/+rXQrW6EXVpnhONCpf6R4AE/SjCcJ5nEk3jweny0xf8sR9XldcYE+iCoz Cv6kR0GH8V7fK2e6pybEiEXsgVfdglxzeERVaDtUCfHZBDWXGl7v0/emAcTAqb3K/Z+Y 2FARFWTFFUcZKVlUwt9YJNUqqLhgvYTKgThx6RtqhBhoxNwtVgWktx4CxRhkSc6R9N/v 4rdWTxqqpDe30npexMyrfQvIeMTTgdjHzFsusMfthftgwKdvEJkSNRIkw5Cu5qKiqQdT Gq3Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references :mail-followup-to:message-id:subject:to:from:date :arc-authentication-results; bh=KHFXw/NNhaIxWVljP+GLjK01ftRafQuHD+Un0XeXa/0=; b=t/aAKd1H4nITS9HebmLTE5d1kg0w1nx+EVbLHTQwpJmfoP1h7XF7EgqMzThsK3yZUc oze8eNkCkeKCLAPNxBGPYMgN7R5zowmDo3J8avgQzpOwJlBPnhHdpMb8aEASW5wPGOQE EKx5cncNe/qlgOgMlhFDq+4PgsrRiJ2c4JqeWxQtObDIm5hc7MjD3+4cnl0hZ2LYpP9X G5bRkhVMlScyhzRwXv9dGfu3QzPSRiRhvWCDdUePV9EoNGbsbuYZOClrvBOUpqTUuYOu phb5aFM+ZiAkzt2eEiLSNAHAo/vNM+IVM7eJpavawu+9CHtfYRGg5hv5+b0CSoloxV8l 9QOQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 85.214.62.211 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of ibr@radix50.net) smtp.mailfrom=ibr@radix50.net Return-Path: Received: from aqmola.ilbers.de (aqmola.ilbers.de. [85.214.62.211]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s5si1180602wra.3.2018.01.31.06.01.50 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 31 Jan 2018 06:01:50 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 85.214.62.211 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of ibr@radix50.net) client-ip=85.214.62.211; Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 85.214.62.211 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of ibr@radix50.net) smtp.mailfrom=ibr@radix50.net Received: from yssyq.radix50.net (p2E51B2CC.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [46.81.178.204]) (authenticated bits=0) by aqmola.ilbers.de (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4+deb7u1) with ESMTP id w0VE1mDP008476 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 31 Jan 2018 15:01:49 +0100 Received: from yssyq.radix50.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by yssyq.radix50.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8) with ESMTP id w0VE1l32013613 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 31 Jan 2018 15:01:47 +0100 Received: (from ibr@localhost) by yssyq.radix50.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id w0VE1lfb013612 for isar-users@googlegroups.com; Wed, 31 Jan 2018 15:01:47 +0100 Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 15:01:47 +0100 From: Baurzhan Ismagulov To: isar-users@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] wic: now truly go for the wic version we claim to have Message-ID: <20180131140147.GI6508@yssyq.radix50.net> Mail-Followup-To: isar-users@googlegroups.com References: <540bb04ce24f67c121c83801288a3aea6f4cedac.1517390790.git.henning.schild@siemens.com> <9882db52-7c2e-d135-2ca5-13c5b9a722a7@siemens.com> <943545ea-d6a4-8fb0-2c95-3d62b1375ad6@siemens.com> <20180131115324.GB6508@yssyq.radix50.net> <20180131122841.GD6508@yssyq.radix50.net> <20180131145330.71603c10@mmd1pvb1c.ad001.siemens.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180131145330.71603c10@mmd1pvb1c.ad001.siemens.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-TUID: 6PoEIZr8JdW7 On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 02:53:30PM +0100, Henning Schild wrote: > Yes, after the reverts and this patch a diff of wic and lib/wic against > the claimed OE version is empty. So, ok to use my modified commit subject and description? With kind regards, Baurzhan.