From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-GM-THRID: 6543570718688280576 X-Received: by 10.46.136.78 with SMTP id z14mr293144ljj.13.1523618640094; Fri, 13 Apr 2018 04:24:00 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: isar-users@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.46.71.137 with SMTP id u131ls816614lja.10.gmail; Fri, 13 Apr 2018 04:23:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx498Wacuvm+d7Si+XFdWArh6hq9188ff8Zvf9mj+p8wmimTu4ypAfw8h01YPYoFHvDU/6jZS X-Received: by 10.46.133.68 with SMTP id u4mr299099ljj.19.1523618639555; Fri, 13 Apr 2018 04:23:59 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1523618639; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=PxQ/E0xPRn7JgXrKK2gRMeIGaLsLWcYi6SJgvNey0BukHo0ZiYceuUVDMDwLozLf96 +hxTCVCYq2fgbbBwXugwm2UEcijStpMD86HqybAGDc9TJvNoU51De1rHZ1VRFKCrqQxo J2n/PuasQo/e/XXROR2bvs/YVYiCU9/gKY7PVxBJvBEWJeAy+8I18bb+ZFngypJ02U6x FDpARWvV06oi13oEF6phJ+rzCjKVyUaTpc3v9qZgRjqsZ5y8kH1gCBu+UKdWKggdHjK9 6VNBVhtg03A0Xttmv2DxZkTqWM6XPwz9j3qrE1SrfNt6EHom33oMV6AjmoNOpgwEhOMV sARg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references :mail-followup-to:message-id:subject:to:from:date :arc-authentication-results; bh=HDSyeAktVmFzPf2O75bBR+sCtDHwVyMfoXxxNGkBBzE=; b=HntVnSl+Kqhqr7C3Rm3u4ZqYzSff3B9Q/+OfEStFAE3++s6lpr5CHR2P1IEZIqGzu/ j03yFI2O9xN4A5e3Ab6oBZUObi4dk5hmUrkbZHftzQQScp4AhrZ/04GlOOFhJzjNbdVE 8M654HqDzEXLeCRsMm5igzAEjYTUMXaJ2vucbqj97tsqVlHDLjuI2P5TgoL/t3Xyrieu lFn6Hu4N6utNxphRVVr+kB+IK2b189V9g8fTfNt9IBivt8c27RbM+wAWBQ/yJL1N5M0u MDhHEpsB++VizrY7ZnBDiDNgySSXDtbTzBZSw9hBx8Z161FcwHMMirrrK4+rRT4N8KKn 1CfA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 85.214.62.211 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of ibr@radix50.net) smtp.mailfrom=ibr@radix50.net Return-Path: Received: from aqmola.ilbers.de (aqmola.ilbers.de. [85.214.62.211]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i24-v6si234033lfc.4.2018.04.13.04.23.59 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 13 Apr 2018 04:23:59 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 85.214.62.211 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of ibr@radix50.net) client-ip=85.214.62.211; Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 85.214.62.211 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of ibr@radix50.net) smtp.mailfrom=ibr@radix50.net Received: from yssyq.radix50.net (host-80-81-17-52.static.customer.m-online.net [80.81.17.52]) (authenticated bits=0) by aqmola.ilbers.de (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4+deb7u1) with ESMTP id w3DBNu9D007351 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2018 13:23:58 +0200 Received: from yssyq.radix50.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by yssyq.radix50.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8) with ESMTP id w3DBNutx012813 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2018 13:23:56 +0200 Received: (from ibr@localhost) by yssyq.radix50.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id w3DBNuV4012812 for isar-users@googlegroups.com; Fri, 13 Apr 2018 13:23:56 +0200 Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2018 13:23:56 +0200 From: Baurzhan Ismagulov To: isar-users@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] meta-isar/isar-image-base: make kernel optional Message-ID: <20180413112356.GD6488@yssyq.radix50.net> Mail-Followup-To: isar-users@googlegroups.com References: <20180412143614.31202-1-claudius.heine.ext@siemens.com> <20180412143614.31202-2-claudius.heine.ext@siemens.com> <20180413103820.GC6488@yssyq.radix50.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-TUID: b9fhyX29pII6 On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 12:45:10PM +0200, Claudius Heine wrote: > > If I want to generate an NFS rootfs w/o the kernel and an SD image > > with one, > > how would I proceed? > > With two multiconfigs? That would be how I would probably do it. One multiconfig (e.g, qemui386-stretch), product-image-base.bb, product-nfs-base.bb. > > Do I understand correctly, the latter recipe would list > > this line, and the former would not? > > I don't understand your question here. What do you mean with 'latter' > and 'former recipe'? Include IMAGE_INSTALL += "..." in product-image-base.bb but not in product-nfs-base.bb? With kind regards, Baurzhan.