From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-GM-THRID: 6555758672498130944 X-Received: by 2002:a1c:b10a:: with SMTP id a10-v6mr1622011wmf.2.1526384260653; Tue, 15 May 2018 04:37:40 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: isar-users@googlegroups.com Received: by 2002:a1c:e341:: with SMTP id a62-v6ls44260wmh.11.canary-gmail; Tue, 15 May 2018 04:37:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZr6H6DEb7OUdd5Wm7mF7C6stMLeK48ihjWSOG6lrvkAGUc8jPyT3Hl8KaDF0+TO0+V9PZQN X-Received: by 2002:a1c:b2c6:: with SMTP id b189-v6mr1484345wmf.5.1526384260178; Tue, 15 May 2018 04:37:40 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1526384260; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=LdGfP8PV6cGeuBwzz5Rf78xDzDAWhmZFGBCBHdv9nWNvTU7qo73Zz1bAM5iU/eNWsj 8xd6Tpb3x2wG5tg1+XRv1YBWXFiTeb3+5MkjvO0xUJxtLs7/PliA13IIvPnj9nojvqEH uVq750io7VIZO1hAAPMynHePHqB7aXbl6Zof6EzUPF69tqo4yBFCep06/aZLU57F51v4 fGFWyc0zDRVR/tR+H+PpVevf2Y3aBFw2/nJO+4tGo5Y1feuN7pfzjHh/jB/nTuXIIECa bQIp52RruJClGujPzGW68+CVeIpEEVGnivYW02o6OfuSUAsoNawOHaATYc0T8X5QD26M jcSA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:arc-authentication-results; bh=4/tQ2rNKd60YCHTPH/0ij0228rc5XEu0uwj68U3X+Lk=; b=n1OthAOLmaYYwfgo4z4hYIUtV0o59zu4ysYOwguI9jC8BtjjONJY633QzQb6yBTBvr 6Eq+bRqlZnsN0YI/oG/sDuzXFpSosf1NbnVcUugcOpRnYuhLwBobqFNW6DPqdRpHXLrj ieJPRY5BUroWbStNJJZx5M+SgNLxyC+qieOfeNQfyPNQLzruHwfw5dP9w01s/eizwvXk 7b/Y6Td3Jpf7OK/c62F1bat4wD2O4b9va49cTNEjJorEzZHl9Tjy/HCJvCKc+MI8Pndt WKcrM15VpsJTq2iFgA5Exq+Mu6Q9SDLTig3tqJ8pnKPqGBpUXpOvI/5TP4AXLOd1K3HT KeLg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of henning.schild@siemens.com designates 192.35.17.2 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=henning.schild@siemens.com Return-Path: Received: from thoth.sbs.de (thoth.sbs.de. [192.35.17.2]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z83-v6si11177wmc.0.2018.05.15.04.37.40 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 15 May 2018 04:37:40 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of henning.schild@siemens.com designates 192.35.17.2 as permitted sender) client-ip=192.35.17.2; Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of henning.schild@siemens.com designates 192.35.17.2 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=henning.schild@siemens.com Received: from mail3.siemens.de (mail3.siemens.de [139.25.208.14]) by thoth.sbs.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w4FBbdpc029364 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 15 May 2018 13:37:39 +0200 Received: from md1pvb1c.ad001.siemens.net (md1pvb1c.ad001.siemens.net [139.25.68.40]) by mail3.siemens.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w4FBbdLa008547; Tue, 15 May 2018 13:37:39 +0200 Date: Tue, 15 May 2018 13:37:38 +0200 From: Henning Schild To: "[ext] Andreas Reichel" Cc: Subject: Re: Bug: wic integration: Problem with wic-tools Message-ID: <20180515133738.243dbadf@md1pvb1c.ad001.siemens.net> In-Reply-To: <20180515104741.GA27205@iiotirae> References: <20180515104741.GA27205@iiotirae> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.15.0-dirty (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TUID: IkVxT86V//UN Am Tue, 15 May 2018 12:47:41 +0200 schrieb "[ext] Andreas Reichel" : > Hi, > > my last attempt in building with current next results in: > > ------------------ > ERROR: mc:xx-stretch:xx-product-1.0-r0 do_wic_image: Function failed: > do_wic_image (log file is located > at /build/tmp/work/xx-amd64/xx-product/temp/log.do_wic_image.8529) > ERROR: Logfile of failure stored > in: /build/tmp/work/xx-amd64/xx-product/temp/log.do_wic_image.8529 > Log data follows: | DEBUG: Executing shell function do_wic_image | > INFO: Building wic-tools... | | Traceback (most recent call last): > | File "/em/isar/scripts/wic", line 326, in > | sys.exit(main(sys.argv[1:])) > | File "/em/isar/scripts/wic", line 321, in main > | return hlp.invoke_subcommand(args, parser, hlp.wic_help_usage, > subcommands) | File "/em/isar/scripts/lib/wic/help.py", line 97, in > invoke_subcommand | subcommands.get(args[0], > subcommand_error)[0](args[1:], usage) | File > "/em/isar/scripts/wic", line 201, in wic_create_subcommand | if > bitbake_main(BitBakeConfigParameters("bitbake wic-tools".split()), | > NameError: name 'BitBakeConfigParameters' is not defined | WARNING: > exit code 1 from a shell command. | ERROR: Function failed: > do_wic_image (log file is located > at /build/tmp/work/xx-amd64/xx-product/temp/log.do_wic_image.8529) > ERROR: Task > (multiconfig:xx-stretch:/em/isar-xx/recipes-core/images/xx-product.bb:do_wic_image) > failed with exit code '1' NOTE: Tasks Summary: Attempted 86 tasks of > which 0 didn't need to be rerun and 1 failed. > > Summary: 1 task failed: > multiconfig:xx-stretch:/em/isar-xx/recipes-core/images/xx-product.bb:do_wic_image > Summary: There were 24 WARNING messages shown. > Summary: There was 1 ERROR message shown, returning a non-zero exit > code. > > ------------------ > > Seems there is an incompatibility between bitbake and wic versions in > use? This is wic trying to call bitbake, which is something that should never happen if wic was called by bitbake. Even if it worked you would fail running into the bitbake lock. Read the wic code and you will see that you somehow ended up with an invalid "native_sysroot" bringing you to where you run into the problem. Henning > I am investigating this, if nobody else already has an idea why this > happens. > > kr > Andreas