Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] u-boot regression fix, cleanup restoration

[Henning Schild <henning.schild@siemens.com>]

Am Mon, 26 Nov 2018 10:49:53 +0100
schrieb Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>:

> On 26.11.18 10:47, Henning Schild wrote:
> > Did you try putting MACHINE into PV and pinning on that? It is
> > always the same package and multiple versions are .... multiple
> > versions.  
> 
> That won't fly. We want recipes to generate results that be be
> exchanged (u-boot-myboard either from u-boot mainline or from some
> vendor recipe).

Could you explain the problem in more detail? I do not understand the
issue yet. I know the pattern comes from multiconfig conflicts you have
found in jailhouse-images ... but messing with PN at runtime just
sounds like a very bad idea. I am not surprised that uncovered a
bitbake bug ....

Henning

> Jan
> 
> > 
> > Henning
> > 
> > Am Fri, 23 Nov 2018 20:09:44 +0100
> > schrieb Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>:
> >   
> >> See patches for details.
> >>
> >> Urgent for downstream layers with multiple custom u-boot recipes.
> >>
> >> Jan Kiszka (3):
> >>    Revert "u-boot-custom: Use bitbake variables instead of
> >> hardcoded values"
> >>    meta-isar: u-boot: Encode version in URL via PV
> >>    u-boot-custom: Add -dev package to PROVIDES
> >>
> >>   meta-isar/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2018.09.bb | 2 +-
> >>   meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/files/debian/control   | 6 +++---
> >>   meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-custom.inc      | 2 +-
> >>   3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >>  
> >   
>