From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-GM-THRID: 6628523487771230208 X-Received: by 2002:a1c:a010:: with SMTP id j16mr75843wme.14.1543325362221; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 05:29:22 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: isar-users@googlegroups.com Received: by 2002:a1c:9782:: with SMTP id z124ls5832340wmd.13.gmail; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 05:29:21 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/X7SyQQJrrnvEhB3CC/KMKs1vgVogXbUbnR5IhRapWa9JOfiexItv4PAxCGSQmTrizDOfTK X-Received: by 2002:a1c:230e:: with SMTP id j14mr79086wmj.0.1543325361814; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 05:29:21 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1543325361; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=aXU/Ml3yav+XPetb/xl8CfiIWqhFoBsY/anZfhCQcuQNexxukJvhWwAl75FKHkrsme MmFdCAkZL9NmYS15YPfpsDSLWHHhtLi/Gn/ro0NIptavrKC7GCx8CWLamN/5DRuDD+EC Z1rGc8tiJp1ZavUwoXwLnS+mTl1vGKg7suDjTDrK5YqpiA3lt1VD7GQsutDjkOYjf9wc doDgpnav6fsOo+L/rkzSPuqm70ivDyox94otAm8coOvEB5Ur7LSWmXye4edNGE/+KSy3 cK7Q9ajyINGvVw9WhnyflR9VXvpyx+2SwCby572abNrT/Jy3T9VmWhZayKjpmq05SDee e2oQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references :mail-followup-to:message-id:subject:to:from:date; bh=bP0M3yzAJwpKmYgdAMDfCm0x2b7psL7bc2Ya/KMVScg=; b=XT3En3I22mZOK5F+AO2TnG/KMzY1oOZRnw+wrvWEM+B0My6Avzu76Cm64Hrj1D6Npt XLQEqf2/It/JkGN48P1ezxxktb7EXzk/AhO3k+h7xuebcRkamhsQlog2iNwmWgf2hjGe DQXtlW+B7t2ys4ylLzWRRAYi6HTmhjnJqLK6ZKIEN/Plp8AXzsNu4PY5RmnvfChzpqFK T2+tfV8l90gNfSqKPyyIb7Xn4Fu8TmyiB7CstZvOay/sYY/vrd7/p4aB4OGRI037coKO s4RCjRJwjbYhjrAyQ7uog0M9lAVpoyJOOvz8N7fFSBvc7HQR3AJH10eUuQRVYbNwsrQI v7pg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 85.214.62.211 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of ibr@radix50.net) smtp.mailfrom=ibr@radix50.net Return-Path: Received: from aqmola.ilbers.de (aqmola.ilbers.de. [85.214.62.211]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z15-v6si78240wmd.2.2018.11.27.05.29.21 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 27 Nov 2018 05:29:21 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 85.214.62.211 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of ibr@radix50.net) client-ip=85.214.62.211; Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 85.214.62.211 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of ibr@radix50.net) smtp.mailfrom=ibr@radix50.net Received: from yssyq.m.ilbers.de (host-80-81-17-52.static.customer.m-online.net [80.81.17.52]) (authenticated bits=0) by aqmola.ilbers.de (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4+deb7u1) with ESMTP id wARDTJaJ007263 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 14:29:20 +0100 Received: from yssyq.m.ilbers.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by yssyq.m.ilbers.de (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-8) with ESMTPS id wARDTJ2E004649 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 14:29:19 +0100 Received: (from ibr@localhost) by yssyq.m.ilbers.de (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id wARDTIlK004648 for isar-users@googlegroups.com; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 14:29:18 +0100 Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 14:29:18 +0100 From: Baurzhan Ismagulov To: "isar-users@googlegroups.com" Subject: Re: ISAR doesn't honor DL_DIR Message-ID: <20181127132918.GA4334@yssyq.m.ilbers.de> Mail-Followup-To: "isar-users@googlegroups.com" References: <1543323384.28585.20.camel@siemens.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1543323384.28585.20.camel@siemens.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-TUID: QYs4pXRP8x2I Hello Silvano, On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 12:56:27PM +0000, Cirujano Cuesta, Silvano wrote: > I'm moving here a discussion that I've inadvertently started in GitHub > with an issue: [1] Issues are good to have an overview of things to do; discussions are preferred here to have a single archive to search. > According to the Bitbake upstream documentation, the variable DL_DIR is > being honored. So I would expect ISAR to also honor it. But ISAR is not > honoring it in my setup. > > Apparently Bitbake is honoring it in Yocto setups, meaning that Yocto > also honors it. > > Is ISAR expected to honor it or not? Is it a bug in ISAR? Is it an > error in my setup? The short answer is that I've never tried, and patches are welcome. Conceptually, Isar is a user of BitBake. While Isar is explicitly not Yocto, having a useful set of common options would be desirable. I think adding DL_DIR support would be a useful feature. With kind regards, Baurzhan.