From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-GM-THRID: 6628105740465733632 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:698c:: with SMTP id i12-v6mr717887ejr.10.1543395620877; Wed, 28 Nov 2018 01:00:20 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: isar-users@googlegroups.com Received: by 2002:a17:906:4acd:: with SMTP id u13-v6ls5633639ejt.6.gmail; Wed, 28 Nov 2018 01:00:20 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/XobM2tIh/q/ZigAxjuTBjrATSZZfQ4M5DmgmwHHTcNFdmSYtbd1q3PPXHwZq8OwThE+JeR X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:2352:: with SMTP id m18-v6mr717471eja.9.1543395620467; Wed, 28 Nov 2018 01:00:20 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1543395620; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=tsc8sbkZ+M56rUorwMfAD1XLidEh7cmwdye0hYe2kf7eX1LBBaNM97nyhEz5ANGyIV LWxljcWlc/G7dCtDV1tWz1hLRHSuttjOhFMo7locGOwI+ZPIN4hJGmJiIXUrafP8CPAQ MpS0x/YQZbQ76h1KYqhuci8FV1UcP3XWZXlwpsWQQ8IxLC3z67VI4WBjD8ZZ3wSIje/B qT2dfvZxInH9VFfPUyfHKSjPYg911reBMU9KPEHVQ7vISiUs0XLIWhE8yrNpX+x+tkVf TUKty83zSuKkedXIHgRGgNHtaF2hnxkP/tiVSYELCOJt+gthpkT8LcSBIqjYy62FDZ5T xYCQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references :mail-followup-to:message-id:subject:to:from:date; bh=Dfy3/kr591h2EGX99I8xcsmAvW3kTzKa4pV2KmzcEXk=; b=cGfjkX310PHOSUBRnzgADks8YCsO3KgqrLJFUYl2fYales139aIbdfGxa6ras+HjJO OLqFW0nfkk1N5bU0zCF1nIA6kcCqJYKhLagQAFQW+V2oyqKzzd/Qaz4Mar53K6KPmP/Z 7fHYbTWy8gVSbvUqs3YVUErsqMN/e7MD23rOJiTSbEoBF3+Zhv/mNuQPTpEYhV+Du19D jK1TnZbISzxcPGjLEQWcxuri8wcqgQJfyUZSLVSxV9OKKZ9gangZ1dHnhBT8dzhDHxpo qbrOS9RDCINifUVNG9KGMlvyqQUnsqGgRdEWlQWV3s9bAuUUeZ4nxhWibY5h7tPXkfd3 QYww== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 85.214.62.211 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of ibr@radix50.net) smtp.mailfrom=ibr@radix50.net Return-Path: Received: from aqmola.ilbers.de (aqmola.ilbers.de. [85.214.62.211]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k13si384857edx.2.2018.11.28.01.00.20 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 28 Nov 2018 01:00:20 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 85.214.62.211 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of ibr@radix50.net) client-ip=85.214.62.211; Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 85.214.62.211 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of ibr@radix50.net) smtp.mailfrom=ibr@radix50.net Received: from yssyq.m.ilbers.de (host-80-81-17-52.static.customer.m-online.net [80.81.17.52]) (authenticated bits=0) by aqmola.ilbers.de (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4+deb7u1) with ESMTP id wAS90I02010236 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 28 Nov 2018 10:00:19 +0100 Received: from yssyq.m.ilbers.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by yssyq.m.ilbers.de (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-8) with ESMTPS id wAS90Huv018450 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 28 Nov 2018 10:00:17 +0100 Received: (from ibr@localhost) by yssyq.m.ilbers.de (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id wAS90Hd3018449 for isar-users@googlegroups.com; Wed, 28 Nov 2018 10:00:17 +0100 Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 10:00:17 +0100 From: Baurzhan Ismagulov To: isar-users Subject: Re: local apt repo cache not working as documented Message-ID: <20181128090017.GA17904@yssyq.m.ilbers.de> Mail-Followup-To: isar-users References: <20181126105520.03a0209b@md1za8fc.ad001.siemens.net> <20181127104502.7fcdaa85@md1za8fc.ad001.siemens.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181127104502.7fcdaa85@md1za8fc.ad001.siemens.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-TUID: CCywBEWU5vWp Hello Henning, On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 10:45:02AM +0100, Henning Schild wrote: > there is one more issue with that feature. The image you get will > contain an invalid sources.list and will not be "apt-get update"-able, > unlike the one we just "rebuild". Do I understand correctly, you suggest to replace the local URI we bootstrapped from with the upstream URI from meta-isar/conf/distro/.list? I agree that the local URI isn't of much use on the target (unless one NFS-mounts the local repo), but I think that either variant is an arbitrary product policy that won't fit every product. If they target reproducibility, it isn't going to be a Debian URI anyway (if apt is to be used at all). That said, for meta-isar -- which is a playground -- that would be convenient for the user. Feel free to submit a patch. With kind regards, Baurzhan.