From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-GM-THRID: 6633291144595767296 X-Received: by 2002:adf:df83:: with SMTP id z3mr773886wrl.21.1544436863265; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 02:14:23 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: isar-users@googlegroups.com Received: by 2002:adf:b6ac:: with SMTP id j44ls1865948wre.13.gmail; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 02:14:22 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/VKkFjvYKu7w1vYDTFoQL78KCp2+aNqobx++KBuIh+3oO4fKzPRGSrM0igVZJBc3Q8/UwNa X-Received: by 2002:adf:b6ab:: with SMTP id j43mr761563wre.22.1544436862701; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 02:14:22 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1544436862; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=pcOKiRkXC1BOFGpZo6s1x/PIU+RkPfzajH6R3wIU3H6ekb8M5RqTQogSYJIAObF7xJ B5Rj9Kczx9QaLlgTKBApqStDsVI9eegt/qODJXyYjrgisVeQdKpJGApnpMH9rj9VO6Rt 5ephCaORRpdv0AHh6aUykJ7tPRYqoq9yri3At1ZsqIiiXenhzYoYxhQ9ZIDVJON3mNNj y+7xS3T9/28OHAHuvVPlXOv3zV43mVz+4LqTduO+OjQVOBk7aMKaJumKYOIVkbB0wWBI +9KybfvpVY66jqMiG+gxHemA/YDBFI8n0EqnopetQO/dCWOxJWnmpCcfwirUjLJyDiKI lRgw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references :mail-followup-to:message-id:subject:to:from:date; bh=N8MJAErKMgoQJ69i1hRS8vK/VjTmmZD877pjrMTOrbY=; b=rq9lWgxd3DNxtwashjPrQg7Q+VD9WiuXq9qSCuH+Ps824hyQCt+hTQ8BCnquDsTPnJ dOzOOgEdmLz7P0U1r65DNtD0LMAjnMly04pbiSETKvumP3Pw2+HWzlPJiYeq4j3u9XoT h991VSWfuXh7MS49SnzybED0Hml+ToYWz+qdcia2LZspKOpDBIJAfSOMNPMxUwey6/aA yBAlL8Xv4Qfr4uZE2YHN7C5KRJ5KlejmXmXZF8Pmb9l5JFGF3kLVVthYNDCo1lA15aYj Vd/ZLKEND6bgUSP11j3hVrupKzmrl53WeQ479wKriXWydIAqqKHBvzPwNY3LtjZ6RySl TJzg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 85.214.62.211 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of ibr@radix50.net) smtp.mailfrom=ibr@radix50.net Return-Path: Received: from aqmola.ilbers.de (aqmola.ilbers.de. [85.214.62.211]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p19si428045wmc.0.2018.12.10.02.14.22 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 10 Dec 2018 02:14:22 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 85.214.62.211 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of ibr@radix50.net) client-ip=85.214.62.211; Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 85.214.62.211 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of ibr@radix50.net) smtp.mailfrom=ibr@radix50.net Received: from yssyq.m.ilbers.de (host-80-81-17-52.static.customer.m-online.net [80.81.17.52]) (authenticated bits=0) by aqmola.ilbers.de (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4+deb7u1) with ESMTP id wBAAEKG3014249 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 11:14:21 +0100 Received: from yssyq.m.ilbers.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by yssyq.m.ilbers.de (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-8) with ESMTPS id wBAAEKLU017807 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 11:14:20 +0100 Received: (from ibr@localhost) by yssyq.m.ilbers.de (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id wBAAEKil017806 for isar-users@googlegroups.com; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 11:14:20 +0100 Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 11:14:20 +0100 From: Baurzhan Ismagulov To: isar-users Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Use patchwork Message-ID: <20181210101419.GA3197@yssyq.m.ilbers.de> Mail-Followup-To: isar-users References: <1a041b08-1827-1bf6-8344-62fa074f7d41@siemens.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1a041b08-1827-1bf6-8344-62fa074f7d41@siemens.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-TUID: VjYkZdxOoZEl Hello Claudius, On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 10:17:24AM +0100, Claudius Heine wrote: > maybe we could setup patchwork[1] in order to improve the handling of > patches. > > I currently struggle with knowing which patch needs to be reviewed, and > which patchset is superseded etc. It might also help to prevent patches from > being forgotten etc. > > What are your thoughts? Thanks for the idea. Yes, I was thinking about that, too. I'll look into that. With kind regards, Baurzhan.