From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-GM-THRID: 6657178434036301824 X-Received: by 2002:a2e:7f12:: with SMTP id a18-v6mr579866ljd.2.1550052439536; Wed, 13 Feb 2019 02:07:19 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: isar-users@googlegroups.com Received: by 2002:a2e:814b:: with SMTP id t11-v6ls2356597ljg.6.gmail; Wed, 13 Feb 2019 02:07:19 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IZoth3LHv7NStjIqBzBlZyA7i1OSiT+ufSWI3vqMs2cpfECsegV3dB0UUC8V+UYHzmeuM7r X-Received: by 2002:a2e:7f12:: with SMTP id a18-v6mr579857ljd.2.1550052438972; Wed, 13 Feb 2019 02:07:18 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1550052438; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=eKub7D6AjPRCj7hZ3Oxqrn+QOH4ZtNT1OsN0VmHmYIQePiLZLGqvgzLt+c+cuAyT4x 2pQfmZtaQkBkOz3WqUaQoE1A1ZC7wz7DQY6MjzxGhgqqfET9xpCwPNxXRXH4bY91gkyf ZSshkreLqiQgQKJgeYs36d0iQpE8qYWZt5XDTDG3PzPMFEGi9NRoQ1NYeJ/7SgwPogbz YCZ5oQnXW3SIHLFmByb8UbJu6U3DpnjwJMnvffHwuI0+azOkQnLRtZ953mYgWkSCqlAB KD3fW1Vz+174v8OMVjvmbCIw921t/t2IM6wcCyQ0opz1EYX9E71D0vR7/5V/bwPC9Ody 91AQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=chnLeq6r0cCjRDJxPwhGyq5qc5K6KrXmkc+iX/7QYwM=; b=dU2f3AlgJmvmzLjwWwHq2yZzNsX3o7tmH29DA3pNZyxqqEjlpllQ98vStlqrwmqLir /4nnDwfCVsVBrkAM0cIcMUrhkpel8qOtzMmGoyIpK16ZRKQr5w/hvLkxDpEtDXWiNCVS dVaYkO0mI6HQbDYVIASp5/EHTiOdPgHq2VG8bUim/4lpnmetoywRBzvajpvkbH3B/oyd edjc62FkMVya1OWpplPjaAI+K1pfAo0zRGzd9v6963Tp/MW7+Ua/6NhwBpvtF3bWEerM vmUhiliq2PM4Z+xU8j1uB9C7uNu6Vf32utofEbr6TBP/gUdnfgT5YQpkYmBoFE3F9EnN mvmw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of henning.schild@siemens.com designates 192.35.17.28 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=henning.schild@siemens.com Return-Path: Received: from goliath.siemens.de (goliath.siemens.de. [192.35.17.28]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d20si551793lfi.3.2019.02.13.02.07.18 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 13 Feb 2019 02:07:18 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of henning.schild@siemens.com designates 192.35.17.28 as permitted sender) client-ip=192.35.17.28; Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of henning.schild@siemens.com designates 192.35.17.28 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=henning.schild@siemens.com Received: from mail2.sbs.de (mail2.sbs.de [192.129.41.66]) by goliath.siemens.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x1DA7INJ029912 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 13 Feb 2019 11:07:18 +0100 Received: from md1za8fc.ad001.siemens.net ([139.25.0.97]) by mail2.sbs.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x1DA7HgV019140; Wed, 13 Feb 2019 11:07:17 +0100 Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2019 11:07:17 +0100 From: Henning Schild To: Baurzhan Ismagulov Cc: Subject: Re: weird CI errors Message-ID: <20190213110717.2182406f@md1za8fc.ad001.siemens.net> In-Reply-To: <20190213083820.GO805@yssyq.m.ilbers.de> References: <20190212191216.105957d2@md1za8fc.ad001.siemens.net> <20190213083820.GO805@yssyq.m.ilbers.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TUID: +gXwC5JHKMM7 On Wed, 13 Feb 2019 09:38:20 +0100 Baurzhan Ismagulov wrote: > On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 07:12:16PM +0100, Henning Schild wrote: > > Turns out the CI runs into some weird issue that i can not > > reproduce on my machine. From a first couple of google hits it > > might have to do with network filesystem backing storage, might > > that be the case? > > The drive is local, no network fs. > > > > Error message: > > | shell-init: error retrieving current directory: getcwd: cannot > > access parent directories: Value too large for defined data type > > Which task? Google also shows that the directory might have been > deleted. Can we rule out races? Might be a race, my local setup does not do parrallel multiconfig. I think it was ${S} of the recipe hello. I do not see why any other task would go ahead and remove/recreate that, but maybe some false sharing between multiconfigs. I will try if i can reproduce the issue by running the whole ci job. At least on the jenkins it seem pretty reproducable. Henning > > With kind regards, > Baurzhan. >