From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-GM-THRID: 6683767157560442880 X-Received: by 2002:adf:f1c6:: with SMTP id z6mr24412198wro.232.1556189680700; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 03:54:40 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: isar-users@googlegroups.com Received: by 2002:a5d:5287:: with SMTP id c7ls3326791wrv.6.gmail; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 03:54:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzgAZ0D+gsiXb9BGxx1Ux8gTitRZPlJ0TmokZ25lLeCAP69ajd7zBa5tUFZaMClbPqo/tAt X-Received: by 2002:adf:e711:: with SMTP id c17mr10343769wrm.57.1556189680360; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 03:54:40 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1556189680; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=vOKnfMTXQfXDSFjQVp1QS5Se9RBOAUmwEEJ2LCr4pHSsExv25kU1m58SWCpnrXaf5C EGUQmEZgwNDvrGc/r2+9nwKuya8E9wHtsUOHw8qiaEbdf+jgXOuwKPCxtqgtaTf8ogSx w6jeLQDcCp1wDlEAOSXu3HaI3t+LQMt4qrvjvKXXmwXfpkykh+PYPJnp9OnZ0saTa6Xw j7dBmJrVSzkaS9WpjgAbsBJLPygZZoOfZiZoi9PxXsdnsrGYeSBk6uBe//xQ27vX5kzP WelVPkIPQFBGa03ciAXKsOOEDWuIh52o6b/8OPNjCXD5XDBDkGoxaq85AyViLZp0odkf N45g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references :mail-followup-to:message-id:subject:to:from:date; bh=LX657W/SV5HUINwx0AuNyIKakUlmJJddv67TnGL9Rn8=; b=dHKEixQpla2xA7ySpaBpuUjqbG8oCvXVCsyLYKez8bxMOjsXpDpIJi9Ar9lfZQ1Izg Y3vHbtAT8CsjuRl90TKwHSffbZvm+ztc5rZFqc3MZKbmSNhUngMj959jIKZSeAd0xqYa oqT1TQEMDmqt6/KKy+niJzIJfkh1ZYmDtGtp0UK05v3QeaamXcTtZ3p4pSA1ecO/KzK7 CawT0hJet8Mg7BOYn85tHNzMoDhBK3MU6VxqjJ4hnA4ptexD2Cp714WbbpS2QZycyKY+ ssyhZYLys5EvNfGzEq1SZEIUKi+QK6iF1Z0zfJdBXDgipQ6ryyAxSzftoSz6H7rL1FS1 dHdw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 85.214.156.166 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of ibr@radix50.net) smtp.mailfrom=ibr@radix50.net Return-Path: Received: from shymkent.ilbers.de (shymkent.ilbers.de. [85.214.156.166]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t17si1198434wri.5.2019.04.25.03.54.40 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 25 Apr 2019 03:54:40 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 85.214.156.166 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of ibr@radix50.net) client-ip=85.214.156.166; Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 85.214.156.166 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of ibr@radix50.net) smtp.mailfrom=ibr@radix50.net Received: from yssyq.m.ilbers.de (dslb-084-061-174-122.084.061.pools.vodafone-ip.de [84.61.174.122]) (authenticated bits=0) by shymkent.ilbers.de (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-8) with ESMTPSA id x3PAscRq009556 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 12:54:39 +0200 Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 12:54:33 +0200 From: Baurzhan Ismagulov To: isar-users Subject: Re: Project isar_claudius_ilbers_fast_ci on isar-build.org Message-ID: <20190425105433.GK21981@yssyq.m.ilbers.de> Mail-Followup-To: isar-users References: <9563e12a-8b2b-805e-f0a1-ebbf8d82f265@siemens.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on shymkent.ilbers.de X-TUID: HsqhadXqTtsI On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 12:30:58PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > > Now I enabled cross-compilation for rpi-stretch locally and now I cannot > > build next there, but it builds apparently on isar-build... > > ...and apparently also on gitlab-ci. Do I understand correctly, next does build on gitlab-ci? > So we have a race that probably papers > over it in larger CI runs. If you can reproduce without that race, please > debug. That might also be a simpler issue like missing host packages. rpi requires some packages that are not required by other targets. If one doesn't usually build for rpi, those might be missing. > > I would really love to be able to reproduce exactly that issue locally... > > Then buy yourself a blade server as laptop ;). Look, not all issues can be > reproduced locally, at least not before you understood the boundary > conditions. That's very common and not always the problem of some CI system. next should build locally. If there is a problem with the local build, we shouldn't ignore it. Maybe after this first problem is solved, one can also reproduce exactly that issue locally. With kind regards, Baurzhan.