From: Henning Schild <henning.schild@siemens.com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Cc: "[ext] Su, Bao Cheng" <baocheng.su@siemens.com>,
Baurzhan Ismagulov <ibr@radix50.net>,
"isar-users@googlegroups.com" <isar-users@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] image-postproc-extension: empty mechine-id
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 18:37:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190711183709.009be9e7@md1za8fc.ad001.siemens.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c0a604ca-2bac-d628-ef29-d8d998d69381@siemens.com>
Am Thu, 11 Jul 2019 07:34:22 +0200
schrieb Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>:
> On 11.07.19 06:06, [ext] Su, Bao Cheng wrote:
> > On 7/10/2019 7:44 PM, Schild, Henning (CT RDA IOT SES-DE) wrote:
> >> Am Wed, 10 Jul 2019 10:48:31 +0200
> >> schrieb Baurzhan Ismagulov <ibr@radix50.net>:
> >>
> >>> Hello Bao Cheng,
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 10:57:36AM +0000, Su, Bao Cheng wrote:
> >>>> According to manpage of debian machine-id @
> >>>> https://manpages.debian.org/buster/systemd/machine-id.5.en.html,
> >>>> /etc/machine-id should be empty instead of removing.
> >>>>
> >>>> Also according to above manpage, the dbus machine-id is copied to
> >>>> /etc/machine-id if systemd machine-id is empty. However, the dbus
> >>>> machine-id is also created during isar building, which stays the
> >>>> same for every machine using the same image.
> >>>>
> >>>> So here instead of removing, empty this file, and the mechine id
> >>>> will be regenerated at the first boot. Also remove the dbus
> >>>> machine-id to prevent copying.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks, applied to next.
> >>
> >> Mhh the commit message looks pretty ugly. Probably because v2 was
> >> not actually done with git format-patch.
> >>
> >> I would suggest to clean that up and force-push next.
> >>
> > yeah I saw the ugly message from the github.com. Do I have the
> > permissions to force-push the next branch? or do I need re-send the
> > patch to mailing list?
> >
>
> Baurzhan, please re-commit this one. Rewriting next is now less
> critical as it used to be.
Just re-read CONTRIBUTING.md and indeed there is no work about "next"
being rebasing ... There even is "please base your patches on next".
In this case rebasing (force-pushing) in indeed a no-go. Is that a bug
in the description or does Isar not have a rebasing staging branch?
I still remember the days when master was months behind next, forcing
everyone on next. In these days it was a no-go because master was too
slow, but i always assumed it would be possible.
Henning
> Jan
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-11 16:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-08 3:37 Su, Bao Cheng
2019-07-08 6:47 ` Claudius Heine
2019-07-08 10:57 ` Su, Bao Cheng
2019-07-10 8:48 ` Baurzhan Ismagulov
2019-07-10 9:19 ` Su, Bao Cheng
2019-07-10 11:44 ` Henning Schild
2019-07-11 4:06 ` Su, Bao Cheng
2019-07-11 5:34 ` Jan Kiszka
2019-07-11 10:25 ` Baurzhan Ismagulov
2019-07-11 16:37 ` Henning Schild [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190711183709.009be9e7@md1za8fc.ad001.siemens.net \
--to=henning.schild@siemens.com \
--cc=baocheng.su@siemens.com \
--cc=ibr@radix50.net \
--cc=isar-users@googlegroups.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox