From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-GM-THRID: 6740510031426355200 X-Received: by 2002:adf:ce86:: with SMTP id r6mr9223934wrn.57.1569413965552; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 05:19:25 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: isar-users@googlegroups.com Received: by 2002:a1c:a78e:: with SMTP id q136ls1644874wme.1.gmail; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 05:19:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqww8TuA420grJkJxxQpBkLs5wW+7FFwNYJmLWnUshIjEn5pdrtyLYziFiSZVOX2u2hseEzX X-Received: by 2002:a1c:5942:: with SMTP id n63mr7610887wmb.65.1569413965068; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 05:19:25 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1569413965; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=dh+5tm72Gp/ZkNf2l4VFDKAnx7IPxO+Fu/Gjd2mcnL0ZBG8lJynhIz/qQoTcETQ4aY Kcgb8aa3ym/mVwcqE+yuzZKqA0GfbOCaFPpoeDSKTsnXWRKqhMRG1tH7VCFpKnAlwPTe NTz+mHP7uT56Ut/nfTkK7rUYTWV64T5t4bv7gmNzyvvxPlSa2rzJVllywA47YqIf2+2j I0MyBAcW/weKgNRSD3tMNkhgJEZeFaKwnb2wOEpzV8tzYLY8fSrRN99hgyvzb6zSb3Yp m2xPDUJJ1iCa5NHh056z7H/2RU/m2nckiHgnCEhm8jFVe4g1OiJTjk1fQw/057Yg/PAF qS1w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references :mail-followup-to:message-id:subject:to:from:date; bh=uiuf5scS5ox9H+cClW5f3xlyyXwN8KfLoztJhg4/xTI=; b=ge7koLHeNRdpy3C8cuxhawyFARDWBHDobBLYp1neIC8YlmiAYY9P9/dtjByPaOspjf meo3fV3JUILhyShGeT1BHyNywvaDzYmZhrJeUEWHQx/kVv5fow4ENXPX0FEo3e0qhTPq HgZJlqQ8NGd76FZpzGYiaBOJQAjmxjlApMXky5Mt8qnyxqnvvspbJNHyubUJVJR4OJ3C Stq18XYn72pc9TVm+4PKqL42+EirM4pO5shn09y3dCiuZdLsWYZXzCVBrlZgsxEvJcvo LEOg+yoqZx27XLjwudBshBLRm/OPRZ1UbO6YshWNJ2cDDguEYWFaOXk++OOfMWMvE8sv XoQw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 85.214.156.166 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of ibr@radix50.net) smtp.mailfrom=ibr@radix50.net Return-Path: Received: from shymkent.ilbers.de (shymkent.ilbers.de. [85.214.156.166]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i21si347528wml.4.2019.09.25.05.19.24 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 25 Sep 2019 05:19:24 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 85.214.156.166 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of ibr@radix50.net) client-ip=85.214.156.166; Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 85.214.156.166 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of ibr@radix50.net) smtp.mailfrom=ibr@radix50.net Received: from yssyq.m.ilbers.de (host-80-81-17-52.static.customer.m-online.net [80.81.17.52]) (authenticated bits=0) by shymkent.ilbers.de (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-8) with ESMTPSA id x8PCJNiS015935 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 14:19:24 +0200 Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 14:19:23 +0200 From: Baurzhan Ismagulov To: isar-users@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Discussion: Base-apt features Message-ID: <20190925121922.43kgzt52pmcgkaui@yssyq.m.ilbers.de> Mail-Followup-To: isar-users@googlegroups.com References: <20190925074122.GA12490@lightning> <20190925102607.cpvf6wurb4orwigx@yssyq.m.ilbers.de> <5e7ef571-512e-f033-6c94-e7f8beaec469@denx.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5e7ef571-512e-f033-6c94-e7f8beaec469@denx.de> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on shymkent.ilbers.de X-TUID: /sx8yfwsZrLk On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 01:56:37PM +0200, Claudius Heine wrote: > >>> 2. Support for using password protected keys. > Right. It would just be inconvenient to switch between those > configurations for the different use cases that should be satisfiable > simultaneously without change of configuration files or deleting build > results. > > I am currently not using Isar, but is something like this possible? > > BASE_REPO_KEY = "" bitbake ... > BASE_REPO_KEY = "prod.key" bitbake ... That would be indeed convenient. We could look whether bitbake supports that. > >>> 4. Support for adding packages only to base-apt. > > Two departments of the same company, one that develops debian bin and > possible src packages and deploys them to a internal repo for other > departments to use, and the other department that takes these packages > and installs them to an image for the customer. Those packages are not > build by isar then and would be placed in the base-apt repo together > with the src package for delivery to the end-customer, which might not > be what was desired. > > We should probably just check the license and only deliver packages that > are required to be redistributed. Thanks for the scenario, we could consider covering this in some way. With kind regards, Baurzhan.