From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-GM-THRID: 6739560601010307072 X-Received: by 2002:adf:e546:: with SMTP id z6mr5636784wrm.113.1569864056149; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 10:20:56 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: isar-users@googlegroups.com Received: by 2002:adf:8bce:: with SMTP id w14ls3289334wra.11.gmail; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 10:20:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxA9RmM+F2c/Azb8xhIoNbpHETdEjfLLF6yxi1rEmim2F+aC1+bGG8pNessEnHS1MYBgvKf X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6a81:: with SMTP id s1mr14861913wru.246.1569864055665; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 10:20:55 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1569864055; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=a7UdQijsepfHwr/q3V23vEwlir/qOJDeXwcS9vtM6/QpDbIXs1st3kj9NO3w/uDroK G8Lbpc/fvEFAt8Vrbqgdwa5plJyOb1LfAKH0pwR+OsZ1bORX0y880dm/lm/5sSebrVX9 kQuQLPWuocOyDTpD5ntZCqvSK+Lx25q0i1yluA+n1sDxKvjlx0FSwpTmVW/ZU8KArB2p bWuIP+9GiZtZjYAOF8sUKvEviFG1lgyq24hxVQyoCWM48KvBL/cA1zsKnIrfkEMQRQf0 qgDqYoPlRdk6ypMEcwrqcNME8C3mQJQcBEhVJt3P5eWN7iFgFlLjinH7FJ7A5xpmNdll vMmQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references :mail-followup-to:message-id:subject:to:from:date; bh=IJIDRH9RxDFAO61QVLB+lkLxBLh4IFy4+Hv7C/w+rPE=; b=1KHhEy2S6bkat9dKqbxlpTsvv0Oc3OaM43us7r5FYOXiHWmkK4LTP/sbyy1/6twn5d q1SJsB6FKhVJ/8kGiZlM4BemOM3Y84DtVk/kV/uUOseXbaKZK1Lc9EK7jkm1qnOyobYS 9Qfb28VnJUTa8rlAmcFtgeykJIdpxEYyNKQhotpqfX7NYc+hq7RrdcvelkDVq85Yjlp+ so3XWc7E7lPgMMJ8y8jJQQwvkJO+eruV32SWF251NzHwuLhZUcmaEEl3E7T3QgCZovqh wQHdZtwXPKHq4y7k7NwfJPdlffbWDu9Ebl2mZSoIDk3ZvttaZ7+xKUovg2PBDBbmAZf4 4yMw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 85.214.156.166 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of ibr@radix50.net) smtp.mailfrom=ibr@radix50.net Return-Path: Received: from shymkent.ilbers.de (shymkent.ilbers.de. [85.214.156.166]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t15si532678wrs.3.2019.09.30.10.20.55 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 30 Sep 2019 10:20:55 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 85.214.156.166 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of ibr@radix50.net) client-ip=85.214.156.166; Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 85.214.156.166 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of ibr@radix50.net) smtp.mailfrom=ibr@radix50.net Received: from yssyq.m.ilbers.de (dslb-002-200-183-225.002.200.pools.vodafone-ip.de [2.200.183.225]) (authenticated bits=0) by shymkent.ilbers.de (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-8) with ESMTPSA id x8UHKrpR007363 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 19:20:54 +0200 Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 19:20:48 +0200 From: Baurzhan Ismagulov To: isar-users Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 12/27] Detect false sharing of recipes Message-ID: <20190930172048.ihogbjrmsysur4a3@yssyq.m.ilbers.de> Mail-Followup-To: isar-users References: <5a2e329b881ec0b392d0f1abd116f1deeee0f66f.1569176231.git.jan.kiszka@siemens.com> <20190929145700.ads3zbq7hz77olcw@yssyq.m.ilbers.de> <248aa6db-6327-9604-40b6-e7135a5f9961@siemens.com> <20190930095610.shyewhozb46dautr@yssyq.m.ilbers.de> <20190930145326.prsfzcxogzebwbll@yssyq.m.ilbers.de> <5cb07f77-c81f-53ee-7b4c-183e5609ae4c@siemens.com> <20190930153937.n4rvim46yz7k2vc4@yssyq.m.ilbers.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on shymkent.ilbers.de X-TUID: K+o17nPR7lxg On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 06:34:02PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > The differences can come from different HOST_DISTRO_* settings. Those are > applied on a per target distro/arch basis. I see, thanks for the info. I wonder whether those could be moved down to buildchroot / images in the future. > Locking papered over this. And it broke rebuilding on changes. The implementation was broken, no question. Your patches are necessary to provide the correct behavior and will be merged. The question was rather an open one beyond the series, whether one could determine whether there are no differences and keep sharing in that case -- I don't have an answer ATM. With kind regards, Baurzhan.