From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-GM-THRID: 6739560601010307072 X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c743:: with SMTP id c3mr22193929eds.241.1569875375135; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 13:29:35 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: isar-users@googlegroups.com Received: by 2002:a17:907:4420:: with SMTP id om24ls3127975ejb.2.gmail; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 13:29:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwleO+bYE7zfi+lEwiWCkrMpKtqNE/Pd+psId5sAPobKNlmyW3zO4txDrhR1WF8GmHJLRzO X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:81c6:: with SMTP id e6mr10567414ejx.284.1569875374661; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 13:29:34 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1569875374; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=NmIX6Nk6PO6Bc3hiveXHFergxhcsfVe7NX6daLXpD9VKJBjpkCPrP/17kHJ2qKoJ+j fyC6B2nTQIV2MvyBR2ojKKODgooxdBntUSsrH9SQsGz5x9090PqB4A2RuzrBofR+LksK MHFVXcL0iDIBAEGKG8aDHMDHGsgtUBuLQwY9L06w0T8Ac1ZlrteV+eQCBVZwlAjq2sQn adIw6cdUia/WLxdejpYZMYtOj6vkYvVMZXBvQY14uq9m4T1+KPxnIFWZS2Azhzp0LaNw XNa8lIP27XBV+hNmM/U7pQv9G6a+lvWqxFR6z+tj24Vdb6K2QQV+OISozzvrhcrbJLpW j5dw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references :mail-followup-to:message-id:subject:to:from:date; bh=jU+kDAzV2oTP3wRWw6AcNYcwxc1+0j1Zr+9cohwgETA=; b=h5GG8Q5v6Lt5kEZyeQQ002Q+9HMWq8t5UKrSTBow3qH+/GrU3wjNxtX5rV/4Viuqte ui2q7TtY0F5n6bhe4qPUFeKGKEWnUzlpNososJKk1mligSd7Y+cxZFmZGUoykO4nRbx2 PNyH1uS+LBGDcAp76MUWPv5HINN7GxZxJXgGr6zxBeMhoooDm2coBu2YwMrZ7+pK7YhY k6mn/SNXNrP/TurnxnMqqYrp9LPNeUdIRwpOFK6UXuPWVMfws/+r2gkGg/FxErdydGU9 0eHjOsyAhd3kHdBff4R0cBg5m1CGS7Co6oe+ML2On6XoacOOsjiq9Q1Jy3zap/wRdU1m Ohdg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 85.214.156.166 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of ibr@radix50.net) smtp.mailfrom=ibr@radix50.net Return-Path: Received: from shymkent.ilbers.de (shymkent.ilbers.de. [85.214.156.166]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c31si804221edb.0.2019.09.30.13.29.34 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 30 Sep 2019 13:29:34 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 85.214.156.166 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of ibr@radix50.net) client-ip=85.214.156.166; Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 85.214.156.166 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of ibr@radix50.net) smtp.mailfrom=ibr@radix50.net Received: from yssyq.m.ilbers.de (dslb-002-200-183-225.002.200.pools.vodafone-ip.de [2.200.183.225]) (authenticated bits=0) by shymkent.ilbers.de (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-8) with ESMTPSA id x8UKTW46007900 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 22:29:34 +0200 Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 22:29:27 +0200 From: Baurzhan Ismagulov To: isar-users Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 12/27] Detect false sharing of recipes Message-ID: <20190930202927.gbja2adsbomvt73k@yssyq.m.ilbers.de> Mail-Followup-To: isar-users References: <20190929145700.ads3zbq7hz77olcw@yssyq.m.ilbers.de> <248aa6db-6327-9604-40b6-e7135a5f9961@siemens.com> <20190930095610.shyewhozb46dautr@yssyq.m.ilbers.de> <20190930145326.prsfzcxogzebwbll@yssyq.m.ilbers.de> <5cb07f77-c81f-53ee-7b4c-183e5609ae4c@siemens.com> <20190930153937.n4rvim46yz7k2vc4@yssyq.m.ilbers.de> <20190930172048.ihogbjrmsysur4a3@yssyq.m.ilbers.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on shymkent.ilbers.de X-TUID: E5CMJME+R5CQ On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 07:26:22PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > > I wonder whether those could be moved down to buildchroot / images in the > > future. > > Would mean breaking up the only-once repo updates into chunks so that > everything we need in addition can also be pulled later on, but still only > once. But it may not be trivial. Thanks. Sounds complicated indeed. > > The question was rather an open one beyond the series, whether one could > > determine whether there are no differences and keep sharing in that case -- I > > don't have an answer ATM. > > Honestly, I think we have more urgent issues. Correctness first, and then - > when there is a real need - we can think of optimization. Not to imply anyone should ever do it, just discussing. Never mind. With kind regards, Baurzhan.