From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-GM-THRID: 6788114222392803328 X-Received: by 2002:a2e:8ecd:: with SMTP id e13mr5747589ljl.244.1584977110089; Mon, 23 Mar 2020 08:25:10 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: isar-users@googlegroups.com Received: by 2002:a2e:8541:: with SMTP id u1ls2888318ljj.10.gmail; Mon, 23 Mar 2020 08:25:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vv58XgOMCYyMB+LqCNsUyXsCFxDIQA/YN+KVNEh0j/UYuvooG+3t8jEsgHQIYQhtGpnrhNL X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9586:: with SMTP id w6mr14467947ljh.133.1584977109430; Mon, 23 Mar 2020 08:25:09 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1584977109; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ZcfrvLr+kIBLROPAnfrigR3elo7Mvn8LJGSVvTxrcCsXyvXf7GmBVEZ6foXHwS8vZx nTsFeJNQ4KOTEZ9or3kzMpmy0/iSD4tsGqrhB1cGHDN3LlIy0Wg12l4U6wXYgDN3uslG R6VDnql3ArnklYioR5QGCWT1/ZBCuVAvkAKJ78x/cG6Bt53oXVWAdtFIO44N9T9pN6vo vrdE0sIn/GRECtmZOM8s45s5CH9czhg5KPBuHAICJ6Egerz2TmiC8gOnFYnLqhPCbe0m s3a5CzTBMzOUUrsHzneAM52xzdFXdx3z8hUl2PgKsd8EQKVx25/A/npbtqABHJIYc8bq WkKg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=sgElSj+sMuZ8ff5mFImr6iz/taJq3A86BBwJjidikpc=; b=c/RbJqgs+wWy/njVfuAdGzXXzuS1XwyF7LxM+/WhewDfHy8AsZCXcQEeMcOcWbZTe3 u7SULnz/yyu4HHO70buA+/ggYzXlzJTqfYVbXA+NhuDqjN0y/U60tL0x+Z1AkzC6QSmC Py+3cBIcjPPt67e3x7Mulqcjm9IExd83bAlaOiHIGC4ZbZNfoszCzqIYALp6HfU8jLwn 3PlqXKIfvTUcc8XAdfBq09Lewjbbimp0rbXYBAgCflw+iK4aLEHCmpMLW5bHW+D/4Xk9 R5B7tdIRrkd3PRV2f/fxSd2gHCmFN4wIEIxQpSCI/B2qE1dwIPxKd0Mhr5wjz0wySxSx Qp+Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of henning.schild@siemens.com designates 194.138.37.40 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=henning.schild@siemens.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=siemens.com Return-Path: Received: from gecko.sbs.de (gecko.sbs.de. [194.138.37.40]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s22si676724ljp.0.2020.03.23.08.25.09 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 23 Mar 2020 08:25:09 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of henning.schild@siemens.com designates 194.138.37.40 as permitted sender) client-ip=194.138.37.40; Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of henning.schild@siemens.com designates 194.138.37.40 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=henning.schild@siemens.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=siemens.com Received: from mail2.sbs.de (mail2.sbs.de [192.129.41.66]) by gecko.sbs.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 02NFP8TX020964 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 23 Mar 2020 16:25:08 +0100 Received: from md1za8fc.ad001.siemens.net ([167.87.5.182]) by mail2.sbs.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 02NFP8K3012393; Mon, 23 Mar 2020 16:25:08 +0100 Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 16:25:07 +0100 From: Henning Schild To: Baurzhan Ismagulov Cc: Subject: Re: [PATCHv7 00/29] base-apt-rework Message-ID: <20200323162507.11c431d0@md1za8fc.ad001.siemens.net> In-Reply-To: <20200323122238.jut345ldg72kfkpd@yssyq.m.ilbers.de> References: <20200321083148.26160-1-henning.schild@siemens.com> <20200323105653.iw5hlsdgi72qap2w@yssyq.m.ilbers.de> <2048dbe8-a359-fe3e-2295-42168a9a382e@siemens.com> <20200323122238.jut345ldg72kfkpd@yssyq.m.ilbers.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.4 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TUID: BGMYhl3o3YbK Am Mon, 23 Mar 2020 13:22:38 +0100 schrieb Baurzhan Ismagulov : > On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 12:01:45PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote: > > > Several builds passed on Sat and one failed on Sun. The failed > > > targets are all bullseye. At first glance, looks like a > > > regression in bullseye. I'd like to check what the problem is and > > > how we should deal with that in the CI (possibly disabling > > > bullseye for a while). Otherwise, I don't have any issues > > > blocking this series. > > > > As pointed out in the other thread, we should try hard to > > understand why only this series triggers the issue before we > > declare it an upstream problem. > > As I said, I'd like to check what the problem is. I think i am responsible to do that. A first quick shot at a CI bot did not have the wanted effect ... Please let me know if you plan to look into it as well, we should not duplicate the work. I currently assume the ball is on my side again ... Henning > With kind regards, > Baurzhan. >