From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-GM-THRID: 6788114222392803328 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:1184:: with SMTP id g4mr36122262wrx.396.1585046986312; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 03:49:46 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: isar-users@googlegroups.com Received: by 2002:adf:f2cf:: with SMTP id d15ls307759wrp.8.gmail; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 03:49:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vszjklwA3Jle7H9zmwLCwImyEPuWSX3ml5c3xfLD/UF6q4G7MTaqprW2VERSUuHC2ovfs70 X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4705:: with SMTP id y5mr33809275wrq.288.1585046985683; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 03:49:45 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1585046985; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=U2qeyncgD3PGay/O4u2EIX2cCX9MzHdzHNOLvtA+Conm8KOuAZWu3WcdAb0wrnOrhj um4jkh2n9dawQWx3SPnRH9yT25d+1SAPSs8qnmrr3cLbblZVgN1JhkM31C2dd0gwq+p3 eStLqlVkIeoSvwW52Sg5Cl+UYWug0jF51zhfpYv9+r9wykwwUubyB7tu93zGaJFC50Mq nj2+3QBXmLr3tSujBHnv6dlbzk4Az9J4CsY+nYsC+A94XYRY+0wxwJ91677rtFXK95Xp R7HlIEvV3zUUqCaTCyFwqILtnF1DtG1zHitr4yFdyrAOInuvHvqKdHdBSsLhWVuqjmkE 1aPA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references :mail-followup-to:message-id:subject:to:from:date; bh=2qZtxuBejTr5yO0nj6USZc5EiaaWhlxX/bIsanRIg+s=; b=Ndmf5RCWijeplHlwoF9QrzF4ovFFmPgMpP6inRpKkNdnHNpGGZS8HeBj+MK3BAIJK+ FuBMY7hYWInxclbm+uqPGy0avUd8eW1iAO4TG0D3ESqVhy2vBRFaTE0U/FUY/NJ1HvOP 1u4hq6G0YMJlBECAeJwBAXEdSa3lnocj0hKCvuGTgDYATMNL1RH+mQgSCWybn9ZobSyG jEZMe+tYVBSjwBzZNSATv1BU/nZW0QpValEuTXJuloKaj0AKyeXyDvoeyrmvqeehNRnQ Yy3mxzTvMeUs1J+GF6K3r1JSWgjk3kWtO3Gmo1J24UUQISGol+fJCDQfkCs/SeHpuHZt Ieqg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 85.214.156.166 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of ibr@radix50.net) smtp.mailfrom=ibr@radix50.net Return-Path: Received: from shymkent.ilbers.de (shymkent.ilbers.de. [85.214.156.166]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a18si871257wra.0.2020.03.24.03.49.45 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 24 Mar 2020 03:49:45 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 85.214.156.166 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of ibr@radix50.net) client-ip=85.214.156.166; Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 85.214.156.166 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of ibr@radix50.net) smtp.mailfrom=ibr@radix50.net Received: from yssyq.m.ilbers.de (host-80-81-17-52.static.customer.m-online.net [80.81.17.52]) (authenticated bits=0) by shymkent.ilbers.de (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-8) with ESMTPSA id 02OAngtK017244 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 11:49:45 +0100 Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 11:49:42 +0100 From: Baurzhan Ismagulov To: isar-users@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [PATCHv7 00/29] base-apt-rework Message-ID: <20200324104942.b5aapbkqzvu2lwxx@yssyq.m.ilbers.de> Mail-Followup-To: isar-users@googlegroups.com References: <20200321083148.26160-1-henning.schild@siemens.com> <20200323105653.iw5hlsdgi72qap2w@yssyq.m.ilbers.de> <2048dbe8-a359-fe3e-2295-42168a9a382e@siemens.com> <20200323122238.jut345ldg72kfkpd@yssyq.m.ilbers.de> <20200323162507.11c431d0@md1za8fc.ad001.siemens.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200323162507.11c431d0@md1za8fc.ad001.siemens.net> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on shymkent.ilbers.de X-TUID: qJMxzI4g4hnj On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 04:25:07PM +0100, Henning Schild wrote: > > > As pointed out in the other thread, we should try hard to > > > understand why only this series triggers the issue before we > > > declare it an upstream problem. > > > > As I said, I'd like to check what the problem is. > > I think i am responsible to do that. A first quick shot at a CI bot did > not have the wanted effect ... > > Please let me know if you plan to look into it as well, we should not > duplicate the work. I currently assume the ball is on my side again ... That would be great, please continue. The CI is up again and is building your branch. From my builds and the nightly ones some passed, some failed, have to check what is going on. With kind regards, Baurzhan.