From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-GM-THRID: 6790334981638979584 X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9105:: with SMTP id m5mr4334468ljg.37.1585902649188; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 01:30:49 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: isar-users@googlegroups.com Received: by 2002:ac2:4207:: with SMTP id y7ls880562lfh.5.gmail; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 01:30:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJ9yAWDNhJtjSthBnzt1aJhFjiNo5nPiOCPrkW7ym3b76GKGvggYYmV38z9E9I4Hbnov+s/ X-Received: by 2002:ac2:545a:: with SMTP id d26mr4823057lfn.85.1585902648545; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 01:30:48 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1585902648; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=r9i3bXgqfKaSkbDo1SVj0k1EBFJ4PcwFLDpd7gVtIJ416upVfDfmW3whd3FKNjDZhc bIWmzG2RcmitJa2CXSzZzGsOIdgv/NYpLVGVXbA0WF/Pi580N+boY0NK9jJeZPMPSTQl K8JDNidUxMjqJNvk4AOULYRjEynmRPqA6OIbBimUtxgm5l0HlLKpzRy3gJtoOrvhMZTt GMpnDdS4AeKFTjlKQckiG+Jnmumf/DGVcns0xybXdxQ+uGzLce1tvNOJeANsf15HZmx/ 56Z5wf6J2jP3ccXr/pmK8jfuOqFcYPdYfqvbWYHGp9g960yqsNW96JCRDPWyXg8D7Ovr cBtQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references :mail-followup-to:message-id:subject:to:from:date; bh=QAJZkzGoA0EkAoNo4hUvn/qVoG3kFVNZ7kYa4tui7yE=; b=G9B/XDTyw/PvhF8EVPK3Ku2gBaoQeqytqM1nH29ZpNhO1n4H83A0jTexUMdGZ73Nf1 8ISJFbffrr39mRpxFsnnHxMaCyAY9fyUmN7QXC3/dWJV4SwQAZqMLDK2W4hZKWoTixIH TfjWgoB2IKKojiWr4K3WovQhO8UIk9M5u1OV849YH2+xLE6B7H17nWq+r0zaBt0FptrP OiYo/1Tl1KvGUQxmZRxNYRWDsLfH9sP/2uwW55NF1XbtwiUuKs5lt4Kmrjqd6kRLotbR 4xezhFIkiasv0GYwwFM7TQs70jbjUomjcZn9lOdkH2cJ2PpyWNEb6Xrc0bj/trgviWBR LFUA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 85.214.156.166 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of ibr@radix50.net) smtp.mailfrom=ibr@radix50.net Return-Path: Received: from shymkent.ilbers.de (shymkent.ilbers.de. [85.214.156.166]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a21si40284lfr.4.2020.04.03.01.30.48 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Fri, 03 Apr 2020 01:30:48 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 85.214.156.166 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of ibr@radix50.net) client-ip=85.214.156.166; Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 85.214.156.166 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of ibr@radix50.net) smtp.mailfrom=ibr@radix50.net Received: from yssyq.m.ilbers.de (host-80-81-17-52.static.customer.m-online.net [80.81.17.52]) (authenticated bits=0) by shymkent.ilbers.de (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-8) with ESMTPSA id 0338UjBE027769 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 3 Apr 2020 10:30:47 +0200 Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2020 10:30:44 +0200 From: Baurzhan Ismagulov To: isar-users Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] rootfs: Make rootfs finalize a separate task Message-ID: <20200403083044.tzpei3ncng4aztqk@yssyq.m.ilbers.de> Mail-Followup-To: isar-users References: <20200213100820.23444-2-Vijaikumar_Kanagarajan@mentor.com> <20200214054801.11870-1-Vijaikumar_Kanagarajan@mentor.com> <7a71ebe9-9846-41ed-beae-a02360129b89@googlegroups.com> <20200401101838.29a3938e@md1za8fc.ad001.siemens.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on shymkent.ilbers.de X-TUID: rm5IK7W4HNVm On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 12:20:41PM +0530, vijai kumar wrote: > > > A fetch should not be affected by what is in next. I would guess/hope > > > that you just into a temporary network hickup. > > > > I am assuming the same. I hit it in a couple of builds. Anyway my > > local build got through. Triggered another job in CI to see if this > > issues goes away. > > I am getting this fetcher issue consistently (packages differ) in the > ISAR CI build. All my local builds went through. I believe there is > more to it. Some proxy issues affecting apt fetch in CI? We had various network issues before, but I haven't seen such one till now. At least Isar (next) fast built fine till now. Seems that applying your patch uncovers some issue... With kind regards, Baurzhan.