From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-GM-THRID: 6818905211330887680 X-Received: by 2002:a2e:b895:: with SMTP id r21mr551510ljp.244.1588916718162; Thu, 07 May 2020 22:45:18 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: isar-users@googlegroups.com Received: by 2002:ac2:5e74:: with SMTP id a20ls68634lfr.2.gmail; Thu, 07 May 2020 22:45:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzF37B66yfThiG/bOrjRzB/mN3BMtia2N4LaICnR2hTyeNtTDIKZipwOa3V42zBR2DPm5sq X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:3136:: with SMTP id p22mr688700lfd.159.1588916717569; Thu, 07 May 2020 22:45:17 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1588916717; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=0jaRtsUeo6nGpQBzMvPWHLKus90i2zc0mv+Tav2zs+jwpZer+hyfdeCWIJhcgKx6sH MGTfa9eZZlLKEq3uDcrTgvgCvTV9R64fz/1NTrKWuCvOjp6wvH/DvmOYYixhOOw+FDW+ WK/sxvTX0sexBnsczaQir9nlIdYbJh4jYChW8VmMdj9csn2oaYNeMQ2ucgR5ChrbA5PP MdVQwW21rfHV+9ytHSdb/YziDABAH58KAy8DgsQjn47PtNgb2ZnAJhNwNHxzcPbWzBdJ ND6oj5L/Ele1rdF9EJb+gvVPYApPcW5POiaWrAt3c9RJlRf9PJZSeDsBOgZ1J+GF0rWm A1RA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=cC2cjaPZJZKvIANLT8BgMCJPh3vgUJO0hdZgXo8lHkA=; b=DE6v5JTPDsN3RRD7vsBssuIUd5RlNtWLlRYxlY2h7xj/k1Q770MS9p/3dv3X4lgaGA q04WdnPo7L74IKSaGKN89fZs+MiKEhIaA8kZdmpLM5/qEvi162XDNNZtfeN8b4KbNUpA x/RzD2q9+sn/+AlpUfRk5UbgOf/7MWFvnw83pfDtSkcCfDiuuGcsucde6ga3f9ZHauKx BPSkkPpVNnVzT3BTUJaze4el6KeW5QuJM2cDxfYC6fPC1JjyBmvapRfKBZ0UT32YZOry NT4yEbq5VEYlllie0nYt+tKJfWwgVZ9GnFtVKgq6jDpX9zB6vktbN1WZxaNn0K4ca9/M +mCw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of henning.schild@siemens.com designates 194.138.37.39 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=henning.schild@siemens.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=siemens.com Return-Path: Received: from lizzard.sbs.de (lizzard.sbs.de. [194.138.37.39]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 186si37095lfj.5.2020.05.07.22.45.17 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 07 May 2020 22:45:17 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of henning.schild@siemens.com designates 194.138.37.39 as permitted sender) client-ip=194.138.37.39; Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of henning.schild@siemens.com designates 194.138.37.39 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=henning.schild@siemens.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=siemens.com Received: from mail2.sbs.de (mail2.sbs.de [192.129.41.66]) by lizzard.sbs.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 0485jGOq010361 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 8 May 2020 07:45:16 +0200 Received: from md1za8fc.ad001.siemens.net ([139.22.34.114]) by mail2.sbs.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 0485jGNp023888; Fri, 8 May 2020 07:45:16 +0200 Date: Fri, 8 May 2020 07:45:05 +0200 From: Henning Schild To: Baurzhan Ismagulov Cc: isar-users Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] debianize: Add placeholder for original version to CHANGELOG_V Message-ID: <20200508074505.16c67b3c@md1za8fc.ad001.siemens.net> In-Reply-To: <20200507202828.z3pax2l3xgygd7a2@yssyq.m.ilbers.de> References: <20200507194502.cnjs6ftfcyj3ugdh@yssyq.m.ilbers.de> <20200507220215.66937111@md1za8fc.ad001.siemens.net> <20200507202828.z3pax2l3xgygd7a2@yssyq.m.ilbers.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.5 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TUID: NfOYfujM58wp Am Thu, 7 May 2020 22:28:28 +0200 schrieb Baurzhan Ismagulov : > On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 10:02:15PM +0200, Henning Schild wrote: > > The discussion was not finished, IMHO. > > > > Jan went for another patch on top "meta-isar: hello: Use > > in CHANGELOG_V" which raised more questions on this > > series. > > > > The patch on top should have been included in a v4, which would now > > be stuck. > > Oops, I haven't seen the intention to do that, have I overlooked > anything? I've stated the reason in the next mail -- sorry for > one-side decision. If there is consensus on a working approach, I'd > of course welcome that. It was hard to see. The follow up kind of questions this series and the discussion is still ongoing. > > Not sure how to deal with the premature merge now. > > The final solution can be applied on top, or I can revert the patches > if that would help. The feature will potentially vanish or work differently. That should be clear for users. Since isar master is slow many users are on next. Next does not seem to ever rebase. So i say we need to finish the discussion eventually. Until then potentially revert the commits to prevent users jumping on a feature that will be harder to repair once its out there. Let us see what Jan has to say. Maybe the discussion only seems open because the points i raised are not valid in his opinion. Henning > With kind regards, > Baurzhan. >