From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-GM-THRID: 6812695221159067648 X-Received: by 2002:a2e:6a11:: with SMTP id f17mr5840390ljc.109.1591944926587; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 23:55:26 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: isar-users@googlegroups.com Received: by 2002:a05:651c:1032:: with SMTP id w18ls984139ljm.10.gmail; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 23:55:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwN4+6Hsy0Y9xvJ5ykAV4cbIUD9W7ULOQD2+hUBIehE11vxQsrV355Z3iezr1aOOFMNthB1 X-Received: by 2002:a2e:b0ce:: with SMTP id g14mr5963925ljl.49.1591944925795; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 23:55:25 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1591944925; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=aeHxr23Ehd24nxXh2AFzQmchEMr17GYLecasRUTGfz2Fz0IE6K8vFfhy86UOXA/OIa BYosT49Tk/qp0VwbDn2dHpDMS+NGshbewBlim00wswjsxZlQ8sZyVk1zxVsmVTNTZ70p 7Wof6YSX3vjcsA3Yji+nLE0sQhTKm1KnKUr5FCyGW9ENHIjpmW4pVzldRjUAmSJf/So/ 3Z8uTvjBmh8mvuBNu2EkyMKHjL6+mrcudgBVuhWfbghab5IJShgH8qOyMYBV8IFViib+ 3f5h5uUmQ1Q1kXibWL9Pn1XJx97Bqqtphb0ubKKyn5Z5buIgDuuzsDzq9bHdAdkqZ2EQ O/gg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references :mail-followup-to:message-id:subject:to:from:date; bh=Y/IyxIIhpIXCkb/jCtMmoybCDCrzNbCcLaKyTdjskz4=; b=oZkLgPGzRTtVsKn1NOSyfiiObDOH40UrBfvP+DkqWJ2mGugQfCXIYNIhVGxj43Gh9u X7xt2DjUDdp2fvLPjIYePSZxCXnAoMA7nLmNZGFPBGi80HSBXu4kwdxk+PUENsBpPx/L t3XLFvuoP9GkihzqyYcbYYndO06DNhLgJmDQswzmR4uLgLU0B6me2uGAeOujvl2X+hpX j4+0Gcc7gxl98ChgLZzGnMhCDrzamVzLt9G275ATEmsZuI+OpLZKjPdUhcD0G9CT53nC Cc9swvo5NQXvs+xkzCcqPNJ/PLr5aw3C3CF3ND3DMWNTNb3cBAS+HiVxN9d0mEL+k8DP 3JWw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 85.214.156.166 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of ibr@radix50.net) smtp.mailfrom=ibr@radix50.net Return-Path: Received: from shymkent.ilbers.de (shymkent.ilbers.de. [85.214.156.166]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u23si296208ljg.7.2020.06.11.23.55.25 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 11 Jun 2020 23:55:25 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 85.214.156.166 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of ibr@radix50.net) client-ip=85.214.156.166; Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 85.214.156.166 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of ibr@radix50.net) smtp.mailfrom=ibr@radix50.net Received: from yssyq.m.ilbers.de (host-80-81-17-52.static.customer.m-online.net [80.81.17.52]) (authenticated bits=0) by shymkent.ilbers.de (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-8) with ESMTPSA id 05C6tM4m026940 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 08:55:24 +0200 Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 08:55:22 +0200 From: Baurzhan Ismagulov To: isar-users@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] fix and test wic exclude-path Message-ID: <20200612065522.GP5077@yssyq.m.ilbers.de> Mail-Followup-To: isar-users@googlegroups.com References: <20200406201648.26945-1-henning.schild@siemens.com> <20200610172627.09cfb239@md1za8fc.ad001.siemens.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200610172627.09cfb239@md1za8fc.ad001.siemens.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on shymkent.ilbers.de X-TUID: IJqrZomuC+JZ Hello Henning, On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 05:26:27PM +0200, Henning Schild wrote: > Still having to work around that in a downstream layer. Any more > comments or questions? I'd like to look at the following issues: 1. I'd like to understand what exactly is failing when the fix is not applied. 2. The test case is failing with the fix applied. Regarding (1), you responded: > The "--exclude-path" is the real diff. It is a wic feature that never > worked in isar because of bind-mounts that oe does not use. It is an > important feature when splitting a rootfs into multiple partitions. > Say you want a seperate home, you would add that and need to exclude > home from root. Same goes for other directories people like to have in > separate partitions, in fact boot is where i found it. Thanks for the explanation. The concept is already clear from your patch description. Do you have an example of a failing ln command and which filesystems the source and the destination are on, for the test case you added? Because I interpret --exclude-path usr as "don't copy usr", but meta-isar/scripts/lib/wic/canned-wks/sdimage-efi.wks contains only / and /boot. If it complained about / and /boot, then I'd expect it to fail also without --exclude-path usr. With kind regards, Baurzhan.