From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-GM-THRID: 6812695221159067648 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:e2d5:: with SMTP id gr21mr13810602ejb.219.1591985511696; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 11:11:51 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: isar-users@googlegroups.com Received: by 2002:a17:906:8483:: with SMTP id m3ls3057735ejx.7.gmail; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 11:11:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy20WjRBvE/Nx6TA+rtGKmWQ7qExJZ82zKPs/YLebsQOj0eYuxN9fXC0DzjsyeDGxV8TOx1 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:a385:: with SMTP id k5mr14940742ejz.44.1591985511209; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 11:11:51 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1591985511; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=eD3UnVVx1kHKplh4rEgi3Wx+HYe6dMLrdueZCHRUFnfJTH2Hvr3oL8oFZWRNX2A854 7lNA9uQgNRoaNxyh7LN2PuR+GdriuOs8Tyt1Rhvq/ZGXyXTR9HUlIFZMyZvj0epMEFUa iOMgtZCalfiT7WoWvWmY+r4QSfqcZohVuQzHcYKu2UzveB4dY5+C/LbK6eN25ZVa+QWV Zty1S/8rumCFbKeyb2IvNA3w2iPaXHIzuGsp3RzWbruCeMJD94sjxe3quSADbuIBMD71 lhwwExhry789xfrOotZM+N773oP1Myt4wqnPNXiLAnNL8UKKGOWZOJdSXW22NkWytgAc hFSw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=wJDTml8XItf3u53QFYSNknPb7Rb0iKDQYoAcvp9W6Fg=; b=M8eOXZYMREVacpviCxF0Sbyqo1Auc7D4CXSuxcS76VZCNBw08r4Gq1fmzGeRguAVDJ JzQL9GFdbLlzCKnDlZw3UG67nNsL4CHtbOylR17ZPgF4NBnOx6pMRmusQ99w1VfkBCfL MmCQgJiD4qYW+VULY+qN50n7jxrNwS6P0I8vXtmlKR04vqT8TlnEaPRWUqAkP7tnuRZD ZnWfvJ5caGl3Q645n8EwmsYWUIjaFWTc3foMhSVruGwpO+LgoDK7/w5xwtffm2AsBAgU MdlLb8yZwNATbLOje9/sf9Gwf5lA3dl2eYANnvIEdC+v0fAqsgIm1ZOtkW/qiMs/wwYc vhlQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of henning.schild@siemens.com designates 194.138.37.40 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=henning.schild@siemens.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=siemens.com Return-Path: Received: from gecko.sbs.de (gecko.sbs.de. [194.138.37.40]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p17si375359edq.5.2020.06.12.11.11.51 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 12 Jun 2020 11:11:51 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of henning.schild@siemens.com designates 194.138.37.40 as permitted sender) client-ip=194.138.37.40; Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of henning.schild@siemens.com designates 194.138.37.40 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=henning.schild@siemens.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=siemens.com Received: from mail2.sbs.de (mail2.sbs.de [192.129.41.66]) by gecko.sbs.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 05CIBo2A031160 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 20:11:50 +0200 Received: from md1za8fc.ad001.siemens.net ([167.87.27.206]) by mail2.sbs.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 05CIBoZV005486; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 20:11:50 +0200 Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 20:11:48 +0200 From: Henning Schild To: "[ext] Jan Kiszka" Cc: isar-users@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] fix and test wic exclude-path Message-ID: <20200612201148.2dc9c146@md1za8fc.ad001.siemens.net> In-Reply-To: <363edd34-2226-0909-ccee-619a7d54b834@siemens.com> References: <20200406201648.26945-1-henning.schild@siemens.com> <20200610172627.09cfb239@md1za8fc.ad001.siemens.net> <20200612065522.GP5077@yssyq.m.ilbers.de> <363edd34-2226-0909-ccee-619a7d54b834@siemens.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.5 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TUID: NWkCTwTZeI9M Am Fri, 12 Jun 2020 17:17:19 +0200 schrieb "[ext] Jan Kiszka" : > On 12.06.20 08:55, Baurzhan Ismagulov wrote: > > Hello Henning, > > > > On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 05:26:27PM +0200, Henning Schild wrote: > >> Still having to work around that in a downstream layer. Any more > >> comments or questions? > > > > I'd like to look at the following issues: > > > > 1. I'd like to understand what exactly is failing when the fix is > > not applied. > > > > 2. The test case is failing with the fix applied. > > > > Before we dig too deep on details: > > The pressure to update wic to a more recent version is increasing, > just received another request today, so is our backlog of own upstream > patches missing in Isar. I would proppose starting that update and > then focuson testing and stabilization of the result. Agreed, we should make sure to use a recent bitbake and wic from upstream. But we have a horrible fork with backports right now ... The history of this one is so that upstream would never have worked. But now that upstream fixed it we could try. > Did anyone look into that already? Briefly ... did not work out of the box. The problem with wic is that it potentially uses new tool args that we do not have in all distros yet. But that can be worked around with some nasty magic and wrappers ... did that in the early stages before we decided to not support < debian 9 with it. Henning > Jan >