From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-GM-THRID: 6812695221159067648 X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4f0d:: with SMTP id c13mr17192748wru.357.1591985842925; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 11:17:22 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: isar-users@googlegroups.com Received: by 2002:a1c:1d84:: with SMTP id d126ls3256572wmd.1.gmail; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 11:17:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxUSweF4B01CwEFb4r3zimcqQCCW9uvorrjUm06Uxgm6VlNqH6+R4WDLRhqaUJsfxqEWUU5 X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c417:: with SMTP id k23mr173868wmi.133.1591985842539; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 11:17:22 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1591985842; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=pEThczHQrI92oIZercWk/mW3ZzfvIMyZngu0uDK5/9lRJNDzZgrXLtyWl5HlYIovYM S3G0qGtFJuQTQnd6m8hWApIk61G80sr18OfeWJiffF+YFwQIJusotiNY3fxe44zQqjwT S5CJUMY7DsVaD9Yew3CTFSymiMspPu1maLpPl++myyXkPBvrb5Pz05k5EuEXKK1fdId0 6s9wleGYXDV2+/QVMn4+GDxjS9EG/yH9J4awfBMgeeWhblktU+vyIgjC3wJF5v3KyhmZ Kh2cBl3QOfSPsof7r/1PJuScEYyEb6E/DCL7W8Ctjwf2wrc6ZCyL+8FJAN7WIlcM5aSl /ENQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=dlk4AWTyF62IlVb2utw82iR+fa1XSsE4aPP2Xto8VpY=; b=qmpmfvSRNctLPOssEj3yqZUxeac/B3LxKmdF8jbfPQkwwqbL48PK03uWHKovuwQpvS yBk9KjLN9VYBGWKATJN6NlsPsnfAF1P+yaZC+AGT54H6MpAHM+wvk5i4MI2uO12oyPnP Jyqq2GG99Bs918ewrobw5YiBSMDgjiCjlftWXTh/K58TvMr/JAPovQ+Q3HGIsmPg6fCS ymlNJSykVjHbLLtNVQy3/V+DJTzib4IzuaWxiGQWblbjdjixyR/TAHrGQ1efsu45Jjm5 qNeYUHlU1w0UHW/wsnnOB4EBDFZGEO2iZPb5ukT4ta9RTjp5tkpDJ7BxmApoBjU3KDmN 71PQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of henning.schild@siemens.com designates 194.138.37.39 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=henning.schild@siemens.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=siemens.com Return-Path: Received: from lizzard.sbs.de (lizzard.sbs.de. [194.138.37.39]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n27si264262wra.3.2020.06.12.11.17.22 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 12 Jun 2020 11:17:22 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of henning.schild@siemens.com designates 194.138.37.39 as permitted sender) client-ip=194.138.37.39; Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of henning.schild@siemens.com designates 194.138.37.39 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=henning.schild@siemens.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=siemens.com Received: from mail2.sbs.de (mail2.sbs.de [192.129.41.66]) by lizzard.sbs.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 05CIHMMU009277 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 20:17:22 +0200 Received: from md1za8fc.ad001.siemens.net ([167.87.27.206]) by mail2.sbs.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 05CIHLXq011446; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 20:17:21 +0200 Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 20:17:20 +0200 From: Henning Schild To: "[ext] Jan Kiszka" Cc: isar-users@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] fix and test wic exclude-path Message-ID: <20200612201720.68790189@md1za8fc.ad001.siemens.net> In-Reply-To: <20200612201148.2dc9c146@md1za8fc.ad001.siemens.net> References: <20200406201648.26945-1-henning.schild@siemens.com> <20200610172627.09cfb239@md1za8fc.ad001.siemens.net> <20200612065522.GP5077@yssyq.m.ilbers.de> <363edd34-2226-0909-ccee-619a7d54b834@siemens.com> <20200612201148.2dc9c146@md1za8fc.ad001.siemens.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.5 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TUID: oatle0++g6n5 Am Fri, 12 Jun 2020 20:11:48 +0200 schrieb "[ext] Henning Schild" : > Am Fri, 12 Jun 2020 17:17:19 +0200 > schrieb "[ext] Jan Kiszka" : > > > On 12.06.20 08:55, Baurzhan Ismagulov wrote: > > > Hello Henning, > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 05:26:27PM +0200, Henning Schild wrote: > > > > > >> Still having to work around that in a downstream layer. Any more > > >> comments or questions? > > > > > > I'd like to look at the following issues: > > > > > > 1. I'd like to understand what exactly is failing when the fix is > > > not applied. > > > > > > 2. The test case is failing with the fix applied. > > > > > > > Before we dig too deep on details: > > > > The pressure to update wic to a more recent version is increasing, > > just received another request today, so is our backlog of own > > upstream patches missing in Isar. I would proppose starting that > > update and then focuson testing and stabilization of the result. > > Agreed, we should make sure to use a recent bitbake and wic from > upstream. But we have a horrible fork with backports right now ... The clear goal should be submodules or something like it. To prevent any isar specifics and enforce upstream work. Having copies allowed us to get into this mess. (talking about bitbake and libs here) Those other backports should never have been merged ... i just follow along here ... Henning > The history of this one is so that upstream would never have worked. > But now that upstream fixed it we could try. > > > Did anyone look into that already? > > Briefly ... did not work out of the box. The problem with wic is that > it potentially uses new tool args that we do not have in all distros > yet. But that can be worked around with some nasty magic and wrappers > ... did that in the early stages before we decided to not support < > debian 9 with it. > > Henning > > > Jan > > >