From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-GM-THRID: 6812695221159067648 X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4e88:: with SMTP id e8mr16972114wru.188.1591986125814; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 11:22:05 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: isar-users@googlegroups.com Received: by 2002:adf:db45:: with SMTP id f5ls639730wrj.0.gmail; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 11:22:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyueURNiBO4fMptTfMbESOCd5eTwNHV9RATjqyX+TCl8hs6NIQORp2XaWHBbH1DZofw/6xN X-Received: by 2002:a5d:400f:: with SMTP id n15mr17114516wrp.419.1591986125323; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 11:22:05 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1591986125; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=j39fKpp8kJbQuWwl6SAe4oQxdIDNSJ1SEW6KtxCZpMVOkt608rv9veNdHDITcm+WCC fSxorL8DXM2aHNcuj1HtPHGzJAYpW6DeTqzxzWMGEcnSpOg9nMnaBGSbp50aWr/xJAEd gAtJPX37sGuBcrnz3EQFEg+RgMqsbWCOZa1eWKEjtz5ruU47dG3gkYqQXgrGaA1v6fjU yZt4A7lcD5CoIzrDr/8ul0hGa4xBbelyNjx95i1PEjj2UirPRbq+UvgPacB+raybQAe8 VeDatitc1WKiZXRO6lKOmSZ6/dOVlHlK48ccFtFGhdWVFCn3ym7dvQkNQtLPcm6Z4+A2 bvQg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=qPT3zSAwFlro3sovVj6O+Tk1s+jfyzhzMd6VvAykmME=; b=lmpuOSxWa7UZOx9DoFgly96m9LX+UwVM9R+o1W0gr88OJde8OvjUq1vXvUl/44WsCZ lpMTeezUQ40SJ4d3rUyNcVEAS88z8LYKiIt4GE8wFJxlpZ2VpgR82JEAJrTQVqQZtz/Z D/P1ZysrXe8uohxaT9Dm9BbH3bW7kTuL4M9/xvzqapJsOZFBK6GC/by+IarQWHHt9cw6 Q6Xcu2USIxGJNcwiGM6eRkC8J+0VW6IfPppqW/2I9s+Am3G3t3olgv3Ao4tS7qK8pfki X8zhFRIXdnHLds6/UP+aGU3WZZoOHri7pGg109cStmFnP58u9XYn6cmfj+WujJJ6RREX 6TPA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of henning.schild@siemens.com designates 192.35.17.2 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=henning.schild@siemens.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=siemens.com Return-Path: Received: from thoth.sbs.de (thoth.sbs.de. [192.35.17.2]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o14si368718wrx.2.2020.06.12.11.22.05 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 12 Jun 2020 11:22:05 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of henning.schild@siemens.com designates 192.35.17.2 as permitted sender) client-ip=192.35.17.2; Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of henning.schild@siemens.com designates 192.35.17.2 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=henning.schild@siemens.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=siemens.com Received: from mail1.sbs.de (mail1.sbs.de [192.129.41.35]) by thoth.sbs.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 05CIM4V2022859 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 20:22:05 +0200 Received: from md1za8fc.ad001.siemens.net ([167.87.27.206]) by mail1.sbs.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 05CIM4kh027442; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 20:22:04 +0200 Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 20:22:02 +0200 From: Henning Schild To: "[ext] Jan Kiszka" Cc: isar-users@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] fix and test wic exclude-path Message-ID: <20200612202202.3c17bc8c@md1za8fc.ad001.siemens.net> In-Reply-To: <363edd34-2226-0909-ccee-619a7d54b834@siemens.com> References: <20200406201648.26945-1-henning.schild@siemens.com> <20200610172627.09cfb239@md1za8fc.ad001.siemens.net> <20200612065522.GP5077@yssyq.m.ilbers.de> <363edd34-2226-0909-ccee-619a7d54b834@siemens.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.5 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TUID: TKzQx+2AirFd Am Fri, 12 Jun 2020 17:17:19 +0200 schrieb "[ext] Jan Kiszka" : > On 12.06.20 08:55, Baurzhan Ismagulov wrote: > > Hello Henning, > > > > On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 05:26:27PM +0200, Henning Schild wrote: > >> Still having to work around that in a downstream layer. Any more > >> comments or questions? > > > > I'd like to look at the following issues: > > > > 1. I'd like to understand what exactly is failing when the fix is > > not applied. > > > > 2. The test case is failing with the fix applied. > > > > Before we dig too deep on details: > > The pressure to update wic to a more recent version is increasing, > just received another request today, Which feature did the request care about? If it is the exclude, we might me able to stall the inevitable ... Henning > so is our backlog of own upstream > patches missing in Isar. I would proppose starting that update and > then focuson testing and stabilization of the result. > > Did anyone look into that already? > > Jan >