From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-GM-THRID: 6854540895022219264 X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9c59:: with SMTP id t25mr12390293ljj.402.1595952600715; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 09:10:00 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: isar-users@googlegroups.com Received: by 2002:a2e:9190:: with SMTP id f16ls3877064ljg.11.gmail; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 09:10:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxAdfxnAN4UxjRCyE2GZf/33Kq9HTMeBzVFjydWooogZWsyXvuMvX7wEXo3/G8/mOQ6/bmy X-Received: by 2002:a2e:8718:: with SMTP id m24mr13265676lji.253.1595952599915; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 09:09:59 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1595952599; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=PtstREKfpc21PgGph3rJ6BfSkMbxIeAKWdp7uEbyULf+Y5wWnU98BMPE1v+xOzIuk4 IWTmgESFMHn+ndc7+B7pGJug8342P+bFTltARpDdrliRIGD/PlIAFDtoQVT6iMqmP12x 2QO140by8u0L1VoSshk58OeZzBg2Vde/1r0v8AE7eX0Kpnb4zTivGHa8vjofIRfe8nT6 A36o4i1eAjZRvE3rsxXOkLAiZkqmsmNVXHJ2s5vo8gfpao4iT6noXerASPNT0UwA1XX3 J3ANZKqiUDAC5/SAC1njLEKb9aO5adgBWlke7etuDKEaPl9IgzQ52GDe1991nHKCndHQ OSVA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references :mail-followup-to:message-id:subject:to:from:date; bh=rbn0JaqbL1bSN3mpWyKwHBzfeh+Cle4KqiW/Kgkqs4I=; b=mEsu+A6XzITBQlZ/+Rh8h4oefrK0AO9X6YhetXHb/n7XxhEBNw8Jy/3AwZhpiakUe5 1OVNMrevrbXGO+8s965+rjvd12dq+QZmmpg+p/U7Qrj7Jif13CN4wbNF9vFc0BG4xCgv ETRFe+6dlh+WxRlV0jHVTY9sQYFSP8hCn4ll7tKnYtpoqKgK89CYYwUprA8V9GefRub5 HF9L+IZYo9/RPTJgPUwhDIE1cREBc1Qnd4gAjcx1afe05xiTXUMfrLT3S0O5Llj6kS8k x2a3QN1tU99SV6p8XU2bl4o/FqLV7M6aVUpJ/V7f+n3xvZOe5ig88CvG1bHuJpaWto75 os1Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 85.214.156.166 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of ibr@radix50.net) smtp.mailfrom=ibr@radix50.net Return-Path: Received: from shymkent.ilbers.de (shymkent.ilbers.de. [85.214.156.166]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o13si856877lfc.0.2020.07.28.09.09.59 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 28 Jul 2020 09:09:59 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 85.214.156.166 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of ibr@radix50.net) client-ip=85.214.156.166; Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 85.214.156.166 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of ibr@radix50.net) smtp.mailfrom=ibr@radix50.net Received: from yssyq.m.ilbers.de (host-80-81-17-52.static.customer.m-online.net [80.81.17.52]) (authenticated bits=0) by shymkent.ilbers.de (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-8) with ESMTPSA id 06SG9u94025829 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 18:09:58 +0200 Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 18:09:56 +0200 From: Baurzhan Ismagulov To: "isar-users@googlegroups.com" Subject: Re: using unifdef Message-ID: <20200728160955.GO26707@yssyq.m.ilbers.de> Mail-Followup-To: "isar-users@googlegroups.com" References: <20200728180127.3b984ab0@md1za8fc.ad001.siemens.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200728180127.3b984ab0@md1za8fc.ad001.siemens.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on shymkent.ilbers.de X-TUID: S1PYg1On7A5C On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 06:01:27PM +0200, Henning Schild wrote: > I suggest you disable ISAR_CROSS_COMPILE for that one recipe and see > how far you get. Thanks for the analysis, sounds plausible. > The cross feature is hard to get right for chains of dependent > packages, they all need to be cross for everything to work. So another > solution could be to rebuild unifdef in isar and build it cross as > well. But that might just get you to the next package and at the end > you have many recipes to maintain. Without seeing the code, my expectation would be that given the right Build-Depends, the rest should be handled by multiarch (i.e., apt-get build-deps should work out of the box). Are there issues in the practice? In particular, I don't see why one should need to rebuild unifdef, and how that solves the problem. With kind regards, Baurzhan.