From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-GM-THRID: 6916819863124049920 X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c018:: with SMTP id c24mr4018786wmb.41.1610649161898; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 10:32:41 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: isar-users@googlegroups.com Received: by 2002:a1c:b688:: with SMTP id g130ls3127655wmf.3.canary-gmail; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 10:32:41 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy9wnIn2Q9fJM9m8zUFgAi0ZMuT7HdhhdE9v5C3Wa4pVY46OSbbH/Y3F0wRPPW4Lz0P/aEG X-Received: by 2002:a7b:cc0a:: with SMTP id f10mr5052521wmh.6.1610649161037; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 10:32:41 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1610649161; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=VXHtqQDx0PhFDXDKFcvB5nW2RRsoFyCGx/hhohSKc9jRn4qe7af+gpE/DY8Jzok/Um H6ioNRbfOyHcpi+gqeb0g3K4Wh3/vrPakZrkKKaJVA+wAwFS02iXW6OeLa6XVp+71VsU MmsMbpFdvTwYmfZOY7mFtj+jKU0E/W/c9K9tuXLEnDwDf5jpjQIUsHgmMmA0YNpxpCS0 60YiswzD6W746N/gPsbrpCcfkV9XfYShvE8YCbpkljA521l7XBzVd/DvxMBjmClbnzR8 PKvnyaE+cSR7U1GO6EswEDIiIHssGSCsIburPDv4LwcQLoUWo31jXeIcdG5cJ+I2/Pza tdlA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=v2pZzpE9kPTkn/7/+yYOfL6sbzVoHz6K08/UQkfHKZA=; b=YntpgxK2V2FSObxgONpv6+Q94pb/u7yIP7zYzQ1rX4K9unSx82Fhx+qx/JPJiDfiTZ MKByz4qYIy1bSMn2PklagFd/ECfZ9iUOOoZjFtnZasVmiQfVvHCrjQyUBmHWXlaX8qZR t5tTv4wyOq/sBQWQlhI7vCtpsL44R23XogoLvfKLA+a6sdydj3rfXYOiL6h1Ehz3qCxl 6vw2bPzAVFCPwP0GveQnfZzmhRmpS7nAriJ2wjax3dxZJIYQM1kDrtu1pemGFnsrP9tU 1z8H3Rqd4SCV7DX3CA4EX0JpLaUvA7catVbmpibOMseWouujnTodGNSQwtvuc4sS1P3C jwIQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of henning.schild@siemens.com designates 192.35.17.28 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=henning.schild@siemens.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=siemens.com Return-Path: Received: from goliath.siemens.de (goliath.siemens.de. [192.35.17.28]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 18si474875wmg.2.2021.01.14.10.32.40 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 14 Jan 2021 10:32:41 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of henning.schild@siemens.com designates 192.35.17.28 as permitted sender) client-ip=192.35.17.28; Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of henning.schild@siemens.com designates 192.35.17.28 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=henning.schild@siemens.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=siemens.com Received: from mail1.sbs.de (mail1.sbs.de [192.129.41.35]) by goliath.siemens.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 10EIWejs018699 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 19:32:40 +0100 Received: from md1za8fc.ad001.siemens.net ([167.87.0.137]) by mail1.sbs.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 10EIWd3P002807; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 19:32:40 +0100 Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 19:32:37 +0100 From: Henning Schild To: "[ext] Silvano Cirujano Cuesta" Cc: isar-users@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] support generation of sdk container images Message-ID: <20210114193237.28c8448b@md1za8fc.ad001.siemens.net> In-Reply-To: References: <20210112103338.14712-1-silvano.cirujano-cuesta@siemens.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-TUID: EUkB3xtsNR7M Please do not make my voice count too much, the moment i see "docker" i go "strong reject". A reflex i can not help ... maybe its valuable and i am too much blinded by stereotypes. Henning Am Thu, 14 Jan 2021 14:56:59 +0100 schrieb "[ext] Silvano Cirujano Cuesta" : > I wonder how to interpret the current feelings about this proposal: >=20 > * There's no interest at all. >=20 > * I haven't succeed on raising enough interest. In that case I'd > need more input from people who see the demand for this functionality > to better understand what's missing in my proposal. >=20 > * There's interest, but I should update the patch according the > comments up-to-now before I send a 1st patch series proposal (or a > 2nd RFC). >=20 > I'd appreciate any feedback. The more decision power the person > giving the feedback, the more valuable it is for me :-) >=20 > Thanks! >=20 > =C2=A0 Silvano >=20 >=20 > On 12/01/2021 11:33, [ext] Silvano Cirujano Cuesta wrote: > > This patch series adds to the SDK generation (task `populate_sdk`) > > the possibility of generating container images containing the SDK in > > different formats (multiple formats can be generated at once). > > > > Up-to-now the task `populate_sdk` generates the sdk root filesystem > > (in both as a file tree and in a tarball) that can be chrooted to. > > The same root filesystem can be easily distributed as a container > > image and started as a container. > > > > It's even possible extracting the root filesystem from a container > > image, using the container image format only as a sort of packaging > > system for easy distribution. > > > > More information about its usage is documented in the file > > docs/user_manual.md. > > > > Typical container image management actions (e.g. push an image to a > > container image regitry) are out of scope. Available tools (Docker, > > Skopeo, Buildah, Podman,...) should be used for these actions. > > > > Silvano Cirujano Cuesta (2): > > sdk: support creation of container image > > docs: document usage of sdk container images > > > > doc/user_manual.md | 70 +++++++++++++++++ > > meta/classes/image-sdk-extension.bbclass | 99 > > ++++++++++++++++++++++-- 2 files changed, 162 insertions(+), 7 > > deletions(-)=20 >=20