From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-GM-THRID: 6880878174534631424 X-Received: by 2002:a2e:990c:: with SMTP id v12mr1312558lji.8.1611142535191; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 03:35:35 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: isar-users@googlegroups.com Received: by 2002:a05:6512:3993:: with SMTP id j19ls2669976lfu.3.gmail; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 03:35:34 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxbvyD48MHlj8+yH3DEXRe3hqQY7cpk69/dhh0b9FhbJWinD295wU614J9Wo4uh/DOcczVf X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:3e6:: with SMTP id n6mr3800847lfq.262.1611142534004; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 03:35:34 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1611142534; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ytYN1vNP80wkzauSsKCTvouhgGckqNFQzhpHl9tdkPdV12PKnK8pxoSdjzD6rdPMTt sYbhe3L2K2vdxC2jeZQiNc5fzLRsetBUhksOFZIUY72M/GtORBE1ewNfVBDQedFITxMK y4VGS0sOJjfnvXzh3Pc6AGZGu7YZwUEJWtyAbNtMGeEu3sX4qBAkvOpK0vTpqCZx0yzh POlmQNuFcdM2r9Thi4cekR8SPv3LJIxbM1sFno1jSkr2cScQPcOVGSfNb9jnL1IrvyZm 2CTfMCMoiGNWtCHXgSl5Lr19C/u1xgSaSEIBq/aU9FRZkXVz+e9I9ki1cu0fwsAA6Ix9 neNA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references :mail-followup-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=NdWv3+IeHS662q24g99RiWAmTYT6+8KJuSV9dDiXg7U=; b=gKOYqBBslGuAgfNxmtlCSzhLGBPlZdEVTimInf+neDQ7ai37IY6I8w002rxSUXvymd GbRjXY/IB3hX3NLvGmZryDw6j48kgcs1ZRQrAVNvtEvgX9Fv1yaIrDoQHLuBeliCeElH JFgNZ8wVc5lE11d3Ui8Cr2vFQDD2gQ2W8jsXPekS9S+0yR8UsYcTZoo+ZjGc9kGNSqPC SXTtPM9boxqqU/F0nsLiW4SofaSNu1h5mw4ODxHo2myWov7qPn7B8wa73zSFqtn2BThd 76ZkUbtQHDOjGScf/GorV3D0Qkaxx4qfKRPYSazKEh/Hs+5MTtbf6bkXIMq5wMgAVie9 mj0w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 85.214.156.166 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of ibr@radix50.net) smtp.mailfrom=ibr@radix50.net Return-Path: Received: from shymkent.ilbers.de (shymkent.ilbers.de. [85.214.156.166]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z9si48036ljk.2.2021.01.20.03.35.33 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 20 Jan 2021 03:35:33 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 85.214.156.166 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of ibr@radix50.net) client-ip=85.214.156.166; Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 85.214.156.166 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of ibr@radix50.net) smtp.mailfrom=ibr@radix50.net Received: from yssyq.m.ilbers.de (host-80-81-17-52.static.customer.m-online.net [80.81.17.52]) (authenticated bits=0) by shymkent.ilbers.de (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-8) with ESMTPSA id 10KBZUed018758 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 20 Jan 2021 12:35:32 +0100 Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 12:35:30 +0100 From: Baurzhan Ismagulov To: Henning Schild Cc: "[ext] Jan Kiszka" , Anton Mikanovich , isar-users@googlegroups.com, Yuri Adamov Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] isar-bootstrap: Run gpg-agent before starting apt-key Message-ID: <20210120113530.GY22444@yssyq.m.ilbers.de> Mail-Followup-To: Henning Schild , "[ext] Jan Kiszka" , Anton Mikanovich , isar-users@googlegroups.com, Yuri Adamov References: <20210119112001.11651-1-amikan@ilbers.de> <978d7c98-5698-273f-cd27-525529d4b3ea@siemens.com> <7afeb621-53eb-ddfe-b94a-15935127528a@ilbers.de> <03dd4a4a-0d31-ebbe-30da-516445e12c6e@siemens.com> <20210120120457.5fb65262@md1za8fc.ad001.siemens.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210120120457.5fb65262@md1za8fc.ad001.siemens.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on shymkent.ilbers.de X-TUID: ehos9sxE8odM On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 12:04:57PM +0100, Henning Schild wrote: > It seems like a functional change. We did use the native agent before > and now never use it. This is a good point. Yes, we've focused on the CI and not on the interactive build. What do you mean by "native", is it the agent running on my host as my desktop user? If that is required, it would add some more complexity... > But i guess the native agent is potentially still used i.e. when > building packages. This is also a good point. We need agent management, among other reasons, for clean unmounting of the filesystems. If the agent is started elsewhere, we should handle that, too. We used to dpkg-buildpackage -uc -us -- we'll have check that after this patch. With kind regards, Baurzhan.