From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-GM-THRID: 6949068667378204672 X-Received: by 2002:ac2:4c4b:: with SMTP id o11mr489688lfk.173.1619718839335; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 10:53:59 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: isar-users@googlegroups.com Received: by 2002:a05:6512:6c2:: with SMTP id u2ls786571lff.3.gmail; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 10:53:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwu8JD7EyLsZd6hjZli81st6XYvBbKdKhSL0J9VrBVgw1RxktuneOgg2w/rhrCmPRhxPicI X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:78d:: with SMTP id x13mr497410lfr.35.1619718838270; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 10:53:58 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1619718838; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Yo9f67fUiD0GAfD7PseWPtRbPwgDxZ+OW7aUT6t9uk2G0t/2wNksAzgwClimj267I8 I/cEhPhDToCtqM/dfudOuiisK17w9E34EAr8zD6rMwhfelo9CIYAKglXzaoshWrPsRAl ch2htBSBmnbntWEDlsGp/TAlfLsXVLeR1xpx4U+l71xoH8LUpE4gkq3cOUik2jw7lC+4 NLrb2hM4/qCvIFll5bmAhtUM5zyRVd12YKUJMhHJjWYeN0KAMGWSOvnO7O65PG8Vy8dG 6sNGHZDf/0322OJ3+DR7rj7EoZS32SttJPJB8StGVAvMxlJ2BPfqYXrQpH7Mi75p5K2D 2AYg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=7O+S/FeEh7P1gVJ/Yqmbj56vZzkg5A2A7510fVERuow=; b=mKrIK6pA3pBKhlRW1NCSqyg6zPn2o3ArteVqkhkgAJ2MDa7GtkxD6Ed6rxp+h0Wnb0 Gi7sP55z+Yvql0Q2p9XEKq/2jKW6bLTboFAHHM8gFl2hxuH1uKNX55ziHCopK8pcKs39 OSwWDT56y5FPdb+MJYQpcbvDSKI9hIEbgkutZS/XxonOqm/XYwDQKkGlcJjplCz1VkBt xpVs81VAYpR3JCCWTZE0OFWazEI4pg2CRJWHINg5rMv1ifQOQX0oxC5mzO6PG+7XB4mp XyqZ1olYZQR7NXDNIzPuWxGYQ0x/mO0ZdrgKlUj/lDXzyZi92H05d2/obD/VfbIcSODP Llsg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of henning.schild@siemens.com designates 194.138.37.40 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=henning.schild@siemens.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=siemens.com Return-Path: Received: from gecko.sbs.de (gecko.sbs.de. [194.138.37.40]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g25si12332lfb.10.2021.04.29.10.53.58 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 29 Apr 2021 10:53:58 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of henning.schild@siemens.com designates 194.138.37.40 as permitted sender) client-ip=194.138.37.40; Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of henning.schild@siemens.com designates 194.138.37.40 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=henning.schild@siemens.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=siemens.com Received: from mail1.sbs.de (mail1.sbs.de [192.129.41.35]) by gecko.sbs.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 13THrveW019865 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 29 Apr 2021 19:53:57 +0200 Received: from md1za8fc.ad001.siemens.net ([167.87.10.230]) by mail1.sbs.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13THh4bb027720; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 19:43:04 +0200 Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 19:43:03 +0200 From: Henning Schild To: "Moessbauer, Felix" Cc: Anton Mikanovich , isar-users , "jan.kiszka@siemens.com" Subject: Re: [PATCH] ci-build: Protect bullseye container with KFAIL Message-ID: <20210429194303.3cd264fb@md1za8fc.ad001.siemens.net> In-Reply-To: References: <20210409081520.399406-1-amikan@ilbers.de> <982a11de-e990-5334-3896-2b96f7364715@ilbers.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TUID: c5bIlgq0mRo+ Am Thu, 29 Apr 2021 14:05:34 +0000 schrieb "Moessbauer, Felix" : > Hi, > > I stumbled upon that while debugging the build errors on the DKMS > module patch. If possible, we could just bump QEMU in the KAS image > to have a proper fix. Additions to the kas images need to go to the kas ML. the CI of ilbers/isar does not use kas so we might need to detect and skip if possible ilbers not using kas is a problem that i think is being worked on, but it also has value to make sure isar does not depend on kas Henning > Otherwise, we might run into that issue here and there and it's not > obvious that this is the root cause. I don't think that the patch > will be integrated into buster, so we can't just wait for it. > > Anyways, at least a warning message should be emitted when running on > the broken version. > > PS: sending this to the list as well. > > Best regards, > Felix > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Anton Mikanovich > > Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2021 4:01 PM > > To: Moessbauer, Felix (T RDA IOT SES-DE) > > Cc: Kiszka, Jan (T RDA IOT) > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] ci-build: Protect > > bullseye container with KFAIL > > > > 29.04.2021 16:42, Moessbauer, Felix wrote: > > > Hi Anton, > > > > > > I can confirm that the CI patch does not solve the issue (on > > > mc:qemuarm64- > > focal). > > > In case of the gitlab-ci, the KAS image provides the > > > qemu-user-static. > > > > > > I just tried to install qemu-user-static from buster-backports > > > into the KAS > > container and that solved the issue. > > > Maybe Jan might have a look into that. IMO this would be way > > > better than > > trying to work-around in ISAR. > > > > > > Best regards, > > > Felix > > > > Sure that was just an ugly hotfix to not have all CI builds 'red' > > because of that. > > When the original issue will be solved we can remove those KFAILs. > > > > -- > > Anton Mikanovich > > Promwad Ltd. > > External service provider of ilbers GmbH Maria-Merian-Str. 8 > > 85521 Ottobrunn, Germany > > +49 (89) 122 67 24-0 > > Commercial register Munich, HRB 214197 > > General Manager: Baurzhan Ismagulov >