From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-GM-THRID: 7003273629391650816 X-Received: by 2002:adf:9d45:: with SMTP id o5mr2648234wre.226.1630658641013; Fri, 03 Sep 2021 01:44:01 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: isar-users@googlegroups.com Received: by 2002:adf:8b84:: with SMTP id o4ls2596961wra.0.gmail; Fri, 03 Sep 2021 01:44:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzwvw5Z/8dqDusdr8dc7RnMeLJY252wErr73U0qoViwJIdGZMTr0fKz2v8u+F2pcURq1sGQ X-Received: by 2002:adf:c18d:: with SMTP id x13mr2722126wre.83.1630658640042; Fri, 03 Sep 2021 01:44:00 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1630658640; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=FOa5nShzbtDzZhhAp21Tvmysrf1pnHUDKiz+C2gyClUnMrwBeqYnlPwtxUgGn0Ga6z XqOFQ9YhfJRXDYSX7vvXeKgdL8froaPeGAtq9e/gX4n7Z9Iam99Z5l73ujnTf0eqXMBY E5VERaDtR4d4DXiJ0LJun9jTUNrQStKvzfKxXg30J1meWGu9XJDKPyBlOuSyqjS1KhRf VFFQinaGEaZVxGRv4pGzc3ZCeWm+07RNhbz8BpnNmPFuFpm4iRsdSDu0FSvpzpG4ivmN HpPqZDZR6nkOFnCmGJ6b/kdu4+20N5BztsMmSjyniL34mbvZOufHuRdUcFKAiaEjSmk4 PxeA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references :mail-followup-to:message-id:subject:to:from:date; bh=KnUlpEUrMQA6vmhvfFugB3VoB36d2nL1j1v9cq4Ic1k=; b=FlJ6HdFkwSKUM5TvNfy8PybP/nlAnZ+Wf5S0ZHYaQ0d/m8TGxTPZ91i8LksN6LSkkz dNJ9Yho0wLct1oN62CJSwjbLDRyZAqbITYMo5PBDkzDuYM4rjSJwuLgbI9cB7unW4PS/ 7Y3l4rl438/LXYaaY63PMqFuvw5DZdHtv0gEJgq1RCdkBYfGY4hO8fWk/yyn7Y0fb0oH O5kgcC3DKljhZoQlk8TDWksHwm2nPAugDXeWptTyf2EE/UJrSNSRf+XEC5gOnwaVJmvs 6Ay7PILCVBs7Ssqqf8ZMXShSpHOqtmMvGd6TsFqfzlIfSpA/xzt9oq7gLHbRgrJZW5pe YsQw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 85.214.156.166 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of ibr@radix50.net) smtp.mailfrom=ibr@radix50.net Return-Path: Received: from shymkent.ilbers.de (shymkent.ilbers.de. [85.214.156.166]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 3si215377wrl.5.2021.09.03.01.43.59 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Fri, 03 Sep 2021 01:43:59 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 85.214.156.166 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of ibr@radix50.net) client-ip=85.214.156.166; Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 85.214.156.166 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of ibr@radix50.net) smtp.mailfrom=ibr@radix50.net Received: from yssyq.m.ilbers.de (host-80-81-17-52.static.customer.m-online.net [80.81.17.52]) (authenticated bits=0) by shymkent.ilbers.de (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-8) with ESMTPSA id 1838hwap016777 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2021 10:43:59 +0200 Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2021 10:43:57 +0200 From: Baurzhan Ismagulov To: isar-users@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [RFC 0/4] PoC for isar-apt repo reusing Message-ID: <20210903084357.GG28547@yssyq.m.ilbers.de> Mail-Followup-To: isar-users@googlegroups.com References: <20210902095817.32165-1-ubely@ilbers.de> <20210902131145.3d871949@md1za8fc.ad001.siemens.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210902131145.3d871949@md1za8fc.ad001.siemens.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on shymkent.ilbers.de X-TUID: dxPHVgGjmkkq On Thu, Sep 02, 2021 at 01:11:45PM +0200, Henning Schild wrote: > i did not look into the details yet. Just wanted to let you know that > we do have a prototype implementation of using sstate caching. That > allows caching anything, not just isar-apt. Looking forward to the sstate-cache patches. I think both are useful. Sstate caching is about speeding up package building, isar-apt is about Debian workflows. Also, Isar will eventually have to track and distinguish between base-apt and isar-apt. This is needed for correctness if isar-apt provides Build-Depends for other self-built packages (linux-headers, openssl-dev, etc.). On a related note, we've also tested ccache and would hopefully share the patches soon -- it would speed up building when packages do change. With kind regards, Baurzhan.