From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-GM-THRID: 6997052726746021888 X-Received: by 2002:a5d:690e:: with SMTP id t14mr2301739wru.324.1631179040190; Thu, 09 Sep 2021 02:17:20 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: isar-users@googlegroups.com Received: by 2002:a1c:988b:: with SMTP id a133ls604638wme.3.gmail; Thu, 09 Sep 2021 02:17:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyAITi5JYBnq7TryGyBB0L5++0E1HcYtQ6y5xBruY2cXt22PE5+3dFBCAw82b4f4mfW91+N X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:a4b:: with SMTP id c11mr1850745wmq.97.1631179039329; Thu, 09 Sep 2021 02:17:19 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1631179039; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=quc6ENlVo2k1injc3jysgOUrCD1VUM74VXGeRr+417oHUDmbmDnFZlb1Q3VfxFtqjf 0gQ08apog+oN4SNMKKW6dXOy6D+Iq7s+8nOrg66GekN0jE3I8N/TU7d65ZjVHLXJ0/kJ daFp878BDdYotQjJW1KXXKh3Y9KcHhZU/SVpPTnwepJSyA8ch+lYE0+JIM94ZwaUj/4+ 7QnmRJn2wwbBU2sDV97sQBt+TLFACB0SQZG1FfU5eond/jz8ywHWAYVaASnFqbysqjD6 Lk3nacB2BHBdf4tzbx8ZNTxFdqkQZZvVGsBUIdxRCwfzGcNi2l1W31Swn4bhPLDdLPyv 4Dbg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=/zpsNPpPWhn4b9wEodggSiDBzhqxDJ8Wh4l/bh6SbI0=; b=Nri0SLmKRrjoL3HgPHqvqLlplzC+FNPM80MbqKTZLHy0DKCLEJE3TZlEE2HmqWnxp/ W5CYagBNw/Ohoug0oAKRZHxsN8Z9FZ8R9AnyCsww0Clj/sP3pAN9A0dRUScVyKgYyW1z p2eUCw0GQiO6GO07sOJ74R71v+A5yY6D+tetKs8Ttxptd59LAxfFG6UDY5WAwWyh9SBl Da6J74CB97XINWHE3Bu0kqUQgBLDx76sevKA2jIrWtITD0bONa/wgdGbr2gl6RQ01NpS yw8gjaEek9kgKh79F6VTbkeWSftLvDUpada6vca+cozuAWmEYoHegjD4LvNSI3AEmWwx jIAA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of henning.schild@siemens.com designates 192.35.17.28 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=henning.schild@siemens.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=siemens.com Return-Path: Received: from goliath.siemens.de (goliath.siemens.de. [192.35.17.28]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q195si87326wme.1.2021.09.09.02.17.19 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 09 Sep 2021 02:17:19 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of henning.schild@siemens.com designates 192.35.17.28 as permitted sender) client-ip=192.35.17.28; Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of henning.schild@siemens.com designates 192.35.17.28 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=henning.schild@siemens.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=siemens.com Received: from mail2.sbs.de (mail2.sbs.de [192.129.41.66]) by goliath.siemens.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 1899HJ2K026404 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 9 Sep 2021 11:17:19 +0200 Received: from md1za8fc.ad001.siemens.net ([139.25.0.59]) by mail2.sbs.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 1899HFj4017546; Thu, 9 Sep 2021 11:17:15 +0200 Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2021 11:17:15 +0200 From: Henning Schild To: Anton Mikanovich Cc: isar-users@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/6] Restore downstream mounts compatibility Message-ID: <20210909111715.3c7e5da3@md1za8fc.ad001.siemens.net> In-Reply-To: <902bcf06-7857-fb6e-d7df-8a0a9a56d4c0@ilbers.de> References: <20210823102342.3674387-1-amikan@ilbers.de> <20210908174851.4d0345fd@md1za8fc.ad001.siemens.net> <902bcf06-7857-fb6e-d7df-8a0a9a56d4c0@ilbers.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.18.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TUID: HjEgxFhpGKHj Am Thu, 9 Sep 2021 11:13:37 +0300 schrieb Anton Mikanovich : > 08.09.2021 18:48, Henning Schild wrote: > > Is that what was recently applied to next? > > > > We are still having issues some issues with current next and are > > trying to understand things. > > > > One thing i did find is that next contains > > 57b3dc055837 ("Revert "rootfs: Unmount rootfs mounts if not > > needed"") > > > > which reverts > > e438c8f62b9a ("rootfs: Unmount rootfs mounts if not needed") > > > > this guy > > 5e563ac4b707 ("rootfs: Use separate mounts lock file") > > > > was a fix on top of e438c8f62b9a and now also potentially deserves a > > revert. > > > > Henning > > Yes, that was already applied to next. > What kind of issues do you have, are there any logs? I just wrote an email on that. Some builds are getting stuck and it seems that ROOTFS/isar.lock is part of the problem. The layer does have a few recipes that use buildchroot_do_mounts but nothing with locking. Investigation is ongoing, but if you know the problem that builds get stuck at do_deploy_deb that would be interesting to us. > The lockfile changed by 5e563ac4b707 was gone with revert, because it > was introduced by e438c8f62b9a. I see 57b3dc05583743781cad3b46bec915a601d2fbe2 in fact reverts multiple commits. It would be helpful to revert single commits in reverse order and _not_ remove the part of the commit message that contains the sha of the reverted commit. Henning