[PATCH v6 04/13] base: remove unneeded "before do_build" task dependencies

[Adriaan Schmidt <adriaan.schmidt@siemens.com>]

This makes dependencies more precise, in preparation for
the introduction of caching.

Currently the dependency graph is overspecified, and do_build has
too many explicit dependencies. What happens then is that even
if a package (the output of do_dpkg_build) can be taken from
cache, there are still dependencies that cause the execution of
do_fetch, do_patch etc.

Signed-off-by: Adriaan Schmidt <adriaan.schmidt@siemens.com>
---
 meta/classes/base.bbclass      | 4 ++--
 meta/classes/dpkg-base.bbclass | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/meta/classes/base.bbclass b/meta/classes/base.bbclass
index 13134ff..fe5bcb0 100644
--- a/meta/classes/base.bbclass
+++ b/meta/classes/base.bbclass
@@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ python do_fetch() {
         bb.fatal(str(e))
 }
 
-addtask fetch before do_build
+addtask fetch
 
 do_unpack[dirs] = "${WORKDIR}"
 
@@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ python do_unpack() {
         bb.fatal(str(e))
 }
 
-addtask unpack after do_fetch before do_build
+addtask unpack after do_fetch
 
 do_build[noexec] = "1"
 do_build () {
diff --git a/meta/classes/dpkg-base.bbclass b/meta/classes/dpkg-base.bbclass
index 2005707..eddf643 100644
--- a/meta/classes/dpkg-base.bbclass
+++ b/meta/classes/dpkg-base.bbclass
@@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ python do_dpkg_build() {
         bb.utils.unlockfile(lock)
 }
 
-addtask dpkg_build before do_build
+addtask dpkg_build
 
 KEEP_INSTALLED_ON_CLEAN ?= "0"
 
-- 
2.30.2