From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-GM-THRID: 7026321669488640000 X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:4f0f:: with SMTP id l15mr35176658wmq.25.1638179441050; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 01:50:41 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: isar-users@googlegroups.com Received: by 2002:adf:fe0b:: with SMTP id n11ls7140091wrr.0.gmail; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 01:50:40 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyuaiu5kNvJTLRtjjXUa5zdES8U4Io+Qm42+5dgqcnzH4i7tjL9P6ZL6/gMkFbks5bN/1BI X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:1813:: with SMTP id m19mr31901334wrh.51.1638179440188; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 01:50:40 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1638179440; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=LHmFJzp+ydhFPORoxrqCdmac1M/n8bSB9obDgBDJg30dnflhGe0JrJuh+Otohks8kq NOxGmNyV1Xy0If5Q+5uQIXWPcbI9lKG39zwckIkS6SEwOHIhH709sHXfzDLBCbkq5W+2 hERCFX6xsMQP86iqQNfnmWKTJ56++E1c+oggOMGSJDvyoowHpw/dEbvOFmgpdTAtYhdJ s1EJHg0he1v4Ng7zhxxjHqxjEzY05/u/C9msQzhhJI/9AHZBfehD2IIKiuyUsEFFEby6 0Mz4bVKlbOC5u9cz7z2WD4Gcqmom6aUvujxWRgoru/zIGYsJZZupwZKp7K0EQ5+2DB+2 XCLA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=Ra97AQCCdaF8SvPVq6pSCgBK7porLq06NNQJJM6QTOk=; b=aq/lDTpCvEfBJjOgsz57sBcKJpHouhE9gGSU9/A/Gk1KK0oGwSbtwMuSefh3P0o/uY m2S56b0Jr+tugaQ8biLMiO2nN2Z9PiyKrwl0rqmof2YpSfVA0sUDNNJpUkllglzkR2tW 6BTJqg67ik18FPHipxnBF9lcqg6XjoeHPmPQkWI+mqayDaMobD0ALb1v1YioeCO4v8uv /WsojJGGsYOitC1Y1w6DBgD17Ey31exQCtv0GxUTeNz1CXNPWymIy2nVZK24UPbPAYcr ObuA9iO9Px6kgB9FXtii0DdiCI2JcOlHdI97h5zLGpiRzjxRSrOmcGk0IDiXePtpMphI 7nwg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of henning.schild@siemens.com designates 194.138.37.40 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=henning.schild@siemens.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=siemens.com Return-Path: Received: from gecko.sbs.de (gecko.sbs.de. [194.138.37.40]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c2si2560430wmq.2.2021.11.29.01.50.40 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 29 Nov 2021 01:50:40 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of henning.schild@siemens.com designates 194.138.37.40 as permitted sender) client-ip=194.138.37.40; Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of henning.schild@siemens.com designates 194.138.37.40 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=henning.schild@siemens.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=siemens.com Received: from mail2.sbs.de (mail2.sbs.de [192.129.41.66]) by gecko.sbs.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 1AT9odng027766 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 29 Nov 2021 10:50:39 +0100 Received: from md1za8fc.ad001.siemens.net ([139.22.40.107]) by mail2.sbs.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 1AT9odTO008200; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 10:50:39 +0100 Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 10:50:38 +0100 From: Henning Schild To: Anton Mikanovich Cc: "Moessbauer, Felix (T RDA IOT SES-DE)" , "Schmidt, Adriaan (T RDA IOT SES-DE)" , "isar-users@googlegroups.com" , "Baurzhan Ismagulov" Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] Improve handling of ISAR_RELEASE_CMD Message-ID: <20211129105038.202602f7@md1za8fc.ad001.siemens.net> In-Reply-To: References: <20211104110507.2358692-1-felix.moessbauer@siemens.com> <4bf7b75d-f431-9a07-96f0-a1168af073d3@ilbers.de> <8836f60a-e1f6-59e6-1343-cdb5902dbf96@ilbers.de> <20211124131135.0a9a4bdd@md1za8fc.ad001.siemens.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.18.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TUID: 8QK4EYkE3lh2 Am Mon, 29 Nov 2021 12:09:13 +0300 schrieb Anton Mikanovich : > 24.11.2021 15:11, Henning Schild wrote: > > > >>> An alternative could be "/bin/su -" instead of userspec. (but > >>> userspec is a pretty widely used pattern) > >>> > >>> Henning > >>> > I've tried to use `su -`: Jenkins got the correct env and at least > started building, but now fails on RebuildTest with hash diff issue. > This test case just changes dpkg-base.bbclass and rebuilds one target. This might have to do with avocado running maybe multiple tests in the same tree in parallel. Any test that applies patches must revert them and must not run in parallel when in the same tree. Just an educated guess based on weaknesses of our use of avocado that have been pointed out in the past. Henning > Can't reproduce the issue locally (out of CI) for now. > Will try to obtain the real hashes diff from CI. >