From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-GM-THRID: 7026321669488640000 X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9f0d:: with SMTP id u13mr50654516ljk.61.1638191889611; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 05:18:09 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: isar-users@googlegroups.com Received: by 2002:a05:6512:3d9e:: with SMTP id k30ls1944435lfv.1.gmail; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 05:18:08 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzAxORDZhx48xY+KvciGXYBhRm4AJ2laq6nPzfAhAxWByCVnE2z6Aa0RnjgLLNMnJ70n1BM X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:308b:: with SMTP id z11mr45357984lfd.177.1638191888646; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 05:18:08 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1638191888; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=gtRDeC18gT2cB1AVPbnVqQSSGEsI9jo9kilYMG8f+WnX0Hrdh/IwIFQCwm1MAzKAZQ rSeDnr9/xeyCTxArcQgdt5Wtn4c96UqV4OVJYfJVYr6LqTn+QZaRiuZGhku7sXAWcdzC LP/fNltF3DdPEb5KowGnEgBzqHYMIH0dU2NTx9kE1uAvTROWQO5MvnuNq+/L25OdHbzM Tqolm1xcgC/q00hvomXNBYcs3bdjzXHcxy0JQv2Fw9y9suKgVL3hcjosxF/1GaH+izGb YlMuFDpOkbrJeYfMlTIswmdeeKrrSxS4ZiNklvOz3VrgajRuvNd7epcD2aV2NUj8rPLP Nugw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=5Jz9fsXIl5xKne8G3sHfZidzxr2OkHKcHMsHtzJR46w=; b=cOw9ptnMd18LzcYxROCV/GMxiY2BjvrDOERN1qUR6BzpSxlsvtyRyap9iHHwTQxDfw 1WbJEy27ZoKxjZbzdWecZ3EjzAxrTVY2IepXumFrSIm/jPPpan1IzcGEsv+qyhZQtxqK 1jMnifQh3nZ++GBUK3jJvzz2IhVjx6zvnXKOIXgbNHa3AJ5U8f+DCwvvZbE9moNDlwaw NpXjg/U5FHSjXcYL9JWtPgYEED0Z7U6wBG5SojB9tHi7y1BNiRVkYI4grspcdHGFNXxX d47qWLkATY/FSD2JvFcaL/YjjBkV6JGhCaRFQsXzuHI3e+XQ+Ggh5dk45+EZmKws3FdH 1jOg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of henning.schild@siemens.com designates 192.35.17.14 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=henning.schild@siemens.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=siemens.com Return-Path: Received: from david.siemens.de (david.siemens.de. [192.35.17.14]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d8si1270224lfv.13.2021.11.29.05.18.08 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 29 Nov 2021 05:18:08 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of henning.schild@siemens.com designates 192.35.17.14 as permitted sender) client-ip=192.35.17.14; Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of henning.schild@siemens.com designates 192.35.17.14 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=henning.schild@siemens.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=siemens.com Received: from mail1.sbs.de (mail1.sbs.de [192.129.41.35]) by david.siemens.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 1ATDI72I002718 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 29 Nov 2021 14:18:08 +0100 Received: from md1za8fc.ad001.siemens.net ([139.22.40.107]) by mail1.sbs.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 1ATDI7jF024509; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 14:18:07 +0100 Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 14:18:06 +0100 From: Henning Schild To: Anton Mikanovich Cc: "Moessbauer, Felix (T RDA IOT SES-DE)" , "Schmidt, Adriaan (T RDA IOT SES-DE)" , "isar-users@googlegroups.com" , Baurzhan Ismagulov Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] Improve handling of ISAR_RELEASE_CMD Message-ID: <20211129141806.7fcc0fd2@md1za8fc.ad001.siemens.net> In-Reply-To: References: <20211104110507.2358692-1-felix.moessbauer@siemens.com> <4bf7b75d-f431-9a07-96f0-a1168af073d3@ilbers.de> <8836f60a-e1f6-59e6-1343-cdb5902dbf96@ilbers.de> <20211124131135.0a9a4bdd@md1za8fc.ad001.siemens.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.18.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TUID: BLnULoI0/9Dc Am Mon, 29 Nov 2021 16:04:42 +0300 schrieb Anton Mikanovich : > 29.11.2021 12:09, Anton Mikanovich wrote: > > 24.11.2021 15:11, Henning Schild wrote: > >> > >>>> An alternative could be "/bin/su -" instead of userspec. (but > >>>> userspec is a pretty widely used pattern) > >>>> > >>>> Henning > >>>> > > I've tried to use `su -`: Jenkins got the correct env and at least > > started building, but now fails on RebuildTest with hash diff issue. > > This test case just changes dpkg-base.bbclass and rebuilds one > > target. > > > > Can't reproduce the issue locally (out of CI) for now. > > Will try to obtain the real hashes diff from CI. > > > It was caused by the change IMAGE_BUILD_ID from 'v0.7-537-g6085d11' > to 'v0.7-537-g6085d11-dirty' which sounds reasonable. > Was this case (change of source, then rebuild) actually tested? > Well that is to expect! I guess that patch did pass our gitlab based CI, but i do not know. Please give more details on the failure you see. "hash diff issue" ... Otherwise we will be in the "works for me, vs have you tried turning it off and on again" business. Henning