Re: [PATCH] meta: Fix conflicting name of image manifest and dpkg_status

[Henning Schild <henning.schild@siemens.com>]

This looks like an interface change which might require an entry in the
API changelog.

People fetch these files out of CI and pass them to license clearing,
software asset collection and what not. Changing the filename might
have an impact on how to extract the files and feed them to further
processing.

Henning

Am Thu, 23 Dec 2021 12:39:06 +0100
schrieb Uladzimir Bely <ubely@ilbers.de>:

> Features `generate-manifest` and `export-dpkg-status` should
> consider multiconfigs for different distro version of the same
> architecture running in parallel.
> 
> Before, only the most recent manifest and dpkg_status files were
> stored in deploy directory because they overwrote existing files.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Uladzimir Bely <ubely@ilbers.de>
> ---
>  meta/classes/rootfs.bbclass | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/meta/classes/rootfs.bbclass b/meta/classes/rootfs.bbclass
> index 6ecb39df..ff173ec4 100644
> --- a/meta/classes/rootfs.bbclass
> +++ b/meta/classes/rootfs.bbclass
> @@ -231,14 +231,14 @@ rootfs_generate_manifest () {
>      sudo -E chroot --userspec=$(id -u):$(id -g) '${ROOTFSDIR}' \
>          dpkg-query -W -f \
>              '${source:Package}|${source:Version}|${binary:Package}|${Version}\n'
> > \
> -        ${ROOTFS_MANIFEST_DEPLOY_DIR}/"${PF}".manifest
> +
> '${ROOTFS_MANIFEST_DEPLOY_DIR}'/'${PN}-${DISTRO}-${MACHINE}'.manifest
> } 
>  ROOTFS_POSTPROCESS_COMMAND +=
> "${@bb.utils.contains('ROOTFS_FEATURES', 'export-dpkg-status',
> 'rootfs_export_dpkg_status', '', d)}" rootfs_export_dpkg_status() {
> mkdir -p ${ROOTFS_DPKGSTATUS_DEPLOY_DIR} cp
> '${ROOTFSDIR}'/var/lib/dpkg/status \
> -       '${ROOTFS_DPKGSTATUS_DEPLOY_DIR}'/'${PF}'.dpkg_status
> +
> '${ROOTFS_DPKGSTATUS_DEPLOY_DIR}'/'${PN}-${DISTRO}-${MACHINE}'.dpkg_status
> } 
>  do_rootfs_postprocess[vardeps] = "${ROOTFS_POSTPROCESS_COMMAND}"