From: Henning Schild <henning.schild@siemens.com>
To: Florian Bezdeka <florian.bezdeka@siemens.com>
Cc: "isar-users@googlegroups.com" <isar-users@googlegroups.com>,
Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
felix.moessbauer@siemens.com, "Schmidl,
Tobias (T CED SES-DE)" <tobiasschmidl@siemens.com>
Subject: Re: WARNING: expand-on-first boot might shrink your partition on Debian bookworm
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2022 10:59:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220707105959.609e0ecf@md1za8fc.ad001.siemens.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e015d316-30bd-e9f1-d477-bd97c8a4c9ed@siemens.com>
Am Thu, 7 Jul 2022 09:48:22 +0200
schrieb Florian Bezdeka <florian.bezdeka@siemens.com>:
> Hi all,
>
> here comes another Debian bookworm related problem. This time related
> to expand-on-first-boot, which destroys my image during the fist boot.
>
> The linux-util packages has been updated and includes some changes
> related to partition alignment. See [1]. (Thanks Henning for pointing
> me here.) It might happen now that the last partition is shrinked
> instead of expanded.
>
> This is especially relevant for setups where the last partition is the
> root partition and where no more space is available (e.g. booting up a
> wic image with qemu where disk size = image size)
>
> The original partition table looked like this:
>
> label: gpt
> label-id: 8CC4BCD4-F7B9-45F1-A066-DFB4068D6DFC
> device: /dev/sda
> unit: sectors
> first-lba: 34
> last-lba: 4554194
> sector-size: 512
>
> After expand-on-first-boot it looks like that:
> (note the last-lba field)
>
> label: gpt
> label-id: 5305C98F-17AD-4B41-9388-7DC319741C9D
> device: talker-debian-bookworm-qemuamd64.wic
> unit: sectors
> first-lba: 34
> last-lba: 4554320
> sector-size: 512
>
> Booting up again stops in the initrd with the following error:
>
> (initramfs) [ 1.978569] EXT4-fs (sda2): bad geometry: block count
> 550586 exceeds size of device (550400 blocks)
>
> resize2fs called from expand-last-partition.sh already throws a
> warning resize2fs: New size smaller than minimum (550586)
btw systemd-growfs would run into the same problem, fail to shrink ...
brick
Henning
> Ideas welcome...
> Taking over even more...
>
> Best regards,
> Florian
>
>
> [1]
> https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/commit/921c7da55ec78350e4067b3fd6b7de6f299106ee
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-07 9:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-07 7:48 Florian Bezdeka
2022-07-07 8:20 ` Schmidl, Tobias
2022-07-07 8:54 ` Henning Schild
2022-07-07 10:51 ` Bezdeka, Florian
2022-07-07 11:18 ` Henning Schild
2022-07-07 8:59 ` Henning Schild [this message]
2022-07-07 9:30 ` Schmidl, Tobias
2022-07-07 9:33 ` Henning Schild
2022-07-08 6:35 ` Schmidl, Tobias
2022-07-08 6:46 ` Jan Kiszka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220707105959.609e0ecf@md1za8fc.ad001.siemens.net \
--to=henning.schild@siemens.com \
--cc=felix.moessbauer@siemens.com \
--cc=florian.bezdeka@siemens.com \
--cc=isar-users@googlegroups.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=tobiasschmidl@siemens.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox