Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix and cover systemd-boot usage in bookworm

[Henning Schild <henning.schild@siemens.com>]

Am Fri, 8 Jul 2022 10:23:40 +0200
schrieb "Bezdeka, Florian (T CED SES-DE)" <florian.bezdeka@siemens.com>:

> On Fri, 2022-07-08 at 08:11 +0000, Bezdeka, Florian wrote:
> > On Fri, 2022-07-08 at 11:07 +0300, Anton Mikanovich wrote:  
> > > 08.07.2022 10:57, Bezdeka, Florian wrote:  
> > > > Willing to give it a try... But as Henning already mentioned
> > > > patch 1 was lost somewhere...  
> > > It looks like Google Groups issue, because there are all 3 mails
> > > on maillist.  
> > 
> > Nope... It did not make it into my inbox and I can't find it in the
> > archive (google groups) as well. Coverletter and 2/2 made it.
> > 
> > Please resend.
> >   
> > > Anyway, here are declarations I've used there:
> > > 
> > > SYSTEMD_BOOTLOADER_INSTALL = "systemd"
> > > SYSTEMD_BOOTLOADER_INSTALL_debian-bookworm = "systemd-boot"  
> 
> Hm... I'm quite sure hat we (will) have more affected distributions
> like Ubuntu.

Yes this is kind of hard to maintain. But will likely do. Not sure we
need to cater for all distros out there, but only for the ones in isar.

Henning

> > > 
> > > We can't just use 'systemd < 251 | systemd-boot' syntax in direct
> > > apt-get install calls, but maybe the way of installing imager
> > > deps can be rebuild later
> > > to use more flexible dependencies syntax.  
> >   
>