From: Henning Schild <henning.schild@siemens.com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Cc: Anton Mikanovich <amikan@ilbers.de>,
Gylstorff Quirin <quirin.gylstorff@siemens.com>,
<isar-users@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Revert "scripts/ci_build.sh: Set avocado-framework version to 96.0"
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2022 14:50:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220714145058.33bd467b@md1za8fc.ad001.siemens.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c164a746-47b6-f443-27b6-7c500a7b51bc@siemens.com>
Am Thu, 14 Jul 2022 11:19:59 +0200
schrieb Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>:
> On 13.07.22 15:21, Anton Mikanovich wrote:
> > 13.07.2022 16:12, Gylstorff Quirin wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 7/13/22 07:19, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >>> On 12.07.22 19:32, Anton Mikanovich wrote:
> >>>> No more Avocado version limit needed after switching to nrunner.
> >>>>
> >>>> This reverts commit 9aec8ba92912c682f7732b015f1919c5308f40a2.
> >>>> ---
> >>>> scripts/ci_build.sh | 2 +-
> >>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/scripts/ci_build.sh b/scripts/ci_build.sh
> >>>> index fa7208c..debb386 100755
> >>>> --- a/scripts/ci_build.sh
> >>>> +++ b/scripts/ci_build.sh
> >>>> @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ if ! command -v avocado > /dev/null; then
> >>>> rm -rf /tmp/avocado_venv
> >>>> virtualenv --python python3 /tmp/avocado_venv
> >>>> source /tmp/avocado_venv/bin/activate
> >>>> - pip install avocado-framework==96.0
> >>>> + pip install avocado-framework
> >>>> fi
> >>>> # Get Avocado build tests path
> >>>
> >>> Bad idea as you can't predict future API changes of Avocado.
> >>>
> >>
> >> We should use a defined version for the avocado framework. This
> >> simplifies the testing for new developers.
> >>
> >> As alternative we can use a requirements.txt.
> >>
> >> Quirin
> >>> Jan
> >>>
> >>
> > Ok. Let's just fix it to 97.0 for now and move next after manual
> > testing only.
> >
>
> You can have an additionally scheduled pipeline doing "latest" testing
> every week or so and report issues early this way.
Very good idea! But i am afraid that jenkins setup we use for upstream
CI does already have avocado installed, likely even in another version
than we pin here.
Henning
> Jan
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-14 12:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-12 17:32 [PATCH 0/2] Adopt CI to Avocado 97.0 Anton Mikanovich
2022-07-12 17:32 ` [PATCH 1/2] CI: switch to the new runner Anton Mikanovich
2022-07-13 11:20 ` Henning Schild
2022-07-13 12:08 ` Anton Mikanovich
2022-07-12 17:32 ` [PATCH 2/2] Revert "scripts/ci_build.sh: Set avocado-framework version to 96.0" Anton Mikanovich
2022-07-13 5:19 ` Jan Kiszka
2022-07-13 13:12 ` Gylstorff Quirin
2022-07-13 13:21 ` Anton Mikanovich
2022-07-14 9:19 ` Jan Kiszka
2022-07-14 12:50 ` Henning Schild [this message]
2022-07-20 5:52 ` [PATCH 0/2] Adopt CI to Avocado 97.0 Anton Mikanovich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220714145058.33bd467b@md1za8fc.ad001.siemens.net \
--to=henning.schild@siemens.com \
--cc=amikan@ilbers.de \
--cc=isar-users@googlegroups.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=quirin.gylstorff@siemens.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox